Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 84.7% → 98.4%

Time: 12.1s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 15.1×

• Could not converge on a ground truth

  1. x = -6.263450287540594e-22
  2. y = -1.3745875421024086e+283
  3. z = -1.5479047409079464e+215

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 84.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.4 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-92}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.4) (not (<= y 8.2e-92)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.4) || !(y <= 8.2e-92)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.4d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 8.2d-92))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.4) || !(y <= 8.2e-92)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.4) or not (y <= 8.2e-92):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.4) || !(y <= 8.2e-92))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.4) || ~((y <= 8.2e-92)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.4], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 8.2e-92]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.39999999999999991 or 8.2000000000000005e-92 < y

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 85.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 85.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   if -2.39999999999999991 < y < 8.2000000000000005e-92

   1. Initial program 81.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.4 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-92}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 88.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.5e+38) (/ (exp (- z)) y) (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.5e+38) {
		tmp = exp(-z) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.5d+38)) then
        tmp = exp(-z) / y
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.5e+38) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-z) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.5e+38:
		tmp = math.exp(-z) / y
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.5e+38)
		tmp = Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.5e+38)
		tmp = exp(-z) / y;
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.5e+38], N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.5000000000000001e38

   1. Initial program 48.4%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 48.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 48.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 48.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 48.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 71.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   if -1.5000000000000001e38 < z

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.1% accurate, 9.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.26:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -8.2e+186)
   x
   (if (<= y -1.26)
     (+ x (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z 0.5) -1.0))) y))
     (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.2e+186) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= -1.26) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-8.2d+186)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= (-1.26d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 + (z * ((z * 0.5d0) + (-1.0d0)))) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -8.2e+186) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= -1.26) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -8.2e+186:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= -1.26:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -8.2e+186)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= -1.26)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -8.2e+186)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= -1.26)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -8.2e+186], x, If[LessEqual[y, -1.26], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -8.2e186

   1. Initial program 78.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 78.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 78.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -8.2e186 < y < -1.26000000000000001

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 91.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   if -1.26000000000000001 < y

   1. Initial program 82.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 91.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 91.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.26:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.7% accurate, 9.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.18:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.18)
   (+ x (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z (+ 0.5 (* z -0.16666666666666666))) -1.0))) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.18) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + (z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.18d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 + (z * ((z * (0.5d0 + (z * (-0.16666666666666666d0)))) + (-1.0d0)))) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.18) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + (z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.18:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + (z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.18)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(0.5 + Float64(z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.18)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + (z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.18], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(0.5 + N[(z * -0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.17999999999999994

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   if -1.17999999999999994 < y

   1. Initial program 82.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 91.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 91.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.18:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 87.7% accurate, 10.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.55:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.55)
   (+ x (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z (* z -0.16666666666666666)) -1.0))) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.55) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.55d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 + (z * ((z * (z * (-0.16666666666666666d0))) + (-1.0d0)))) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.55) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.55:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0))) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.55)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0))) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.55)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (z * -0.16666666666666666)) + -1.0))) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.55], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(z * -0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.55000000000000004

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 84.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right)} - 1\right)}{y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 84.5%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)} - 1\right)}{y} \]

   11. Simplified 84.5%

       \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right)} - 1\right)}{y} \]

   if -1.55000000000000004 < y

   1. Initial program 82.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 91.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 91.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.55:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 85.8% accurate, 11.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{y - y \cdot z}{y}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.9e+154)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (* z 0.5))) y)
   (if (<= z -9e+121) (/ (/ (- y (* y z)) y) y) (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.9e+154) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y;
	} else if (z <= -9e+121) {
		tmp = ((y - (y * z)) / y) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.9d+154)) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (z * (z * 0.5d0))) / y
    else if (z <= (-9d+121)) then
        tmp = ((y - (y * z)) / y) / y
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.9e+154) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y;
	} else if (z <= -9e+121) {
		tmp = ((y - (y * z)) / y) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.9e+154:
		tmp = (1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y
	elif z <= -9e+121:
		tmp = ((y - (y * z)) / y) / y
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.9e+154)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(z * 0.5))) / y);
	elseif (z <= -9e+121)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(y - Float64(y * z)) / y) / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.9e+154)
		tmp = (1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y;
	elseif (z <= -9e+121)
		tmp = ((y - (y * z)) / y) / y;
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.9e+154], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -9e+121], N[(N[(N[(y - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.8999999999999999e154

   1. Initial program 68.0%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 68.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 68.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 68.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 68.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 64.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 64.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)}{y}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around inf 64.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot z\right)}}{y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 64.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}}{y} \]

   12. Simplified 64.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}}{y} \]

   if -1.8999999999999999e154 < z < -9.0000000000000007e121

   1. Initial program 1.4%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 1.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 1.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 1.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 1.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{z - 1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 1.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}{y}} \]

      2. sub-neg 1.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}}{y} \]

      3. metadata-eval 1.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-1 \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)}{y} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 1.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + -1 \cdot -1}}{y} \]

      5. metadata-eval 1.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-1 \cdot z + \color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

      6. +-commutative 1.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + -1 \cdot z}}{y} \]

      7. mul-1-neg 1.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}}{y} \]

      8. unsub-neg 1.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 - z}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 1.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1 - z}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 2.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} - \frac{z}{y}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-sub 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot y - y \cdot z}{y \cdot y}} \]

      2. associate-/r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1 \cdot y - y \cdot z}{y}}{y}} \]

      3. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{y} - y \cdot z}{y}}{y} \]

      4. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{y - \color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{y}}{y} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{y - z \cdot y}{y}}{y}} \]

   if -9.0000000000000007e121 < z

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 92.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+121}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{y - y \cdot z}{y}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 85.0% accurate, 15.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.1e+129) (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (* z 0.5))) y) (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.1e+129) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.1d+129)) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (z * (z * 0.5d0))) / y
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.1e+129) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.1e+129:
		tmp = (1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.1e+129)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(z * 0.5))) / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.1e+129)
		tmp = (1.0 + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y;
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.1e+129], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.1e129

   1. Initial program 56.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 56.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 56.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 56.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 70.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 53.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)}{y}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around inf 53.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot z\right)}}{y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 53.6%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}}{y} \]

   12. Simplified 53.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}}{y} \]

   if -1.1e129 < z

   1. Initial program 87.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 92.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 92.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 67.0% accurate, 16.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-89}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.15e+16) x (if (<= y 4e-89) (/ 1.0 y) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 4e-89) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.15d+16)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 4d-89) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 4e-89) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.15e+16:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 4e-89:
		tmp = 1.0 / y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.15e+16)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 4e-89)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.15e+16)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 4e-89)
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.15e+16], x, If[LessEqual[y, 4e-89], N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.15e16 or 4.00000000000000015e-89 < y

   1. Initial program 84.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.15e16 < y < 4.00000000000000015e-89

   1. Initial program 83.0%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 83.9% accurate, 42.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.1%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 90.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 90.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 82.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 49.4% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 84.1%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 90.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 90.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 91.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024165 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 17788539399477/2500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))