Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, C

Percentage Accurate: 97.7% → 98.4%

Time: 11.7s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.5×

• 32.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0d0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0d0)) + c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)) + c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0d0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0d0)) + c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)) + c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c}{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) (+ c t_1) (* y (+ x (/ c y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = ((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = c + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (x + (c / y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = ((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = c + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (x + (c / y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	t_1 = ((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = c + t_1
	else:
		tmp = y * (x + (c / y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(c + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + Float64(c / y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = ((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = c + t_1;
	else
		tmp = y * (x + (c / y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], N[(c + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(x + N[(c / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (/.f64 (*.f64 z t) #s(literal 16 binary64))) (/.f64 (*.f64 a b) #s(literal 4 binary64))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (/.f64 (*.f64 z t) #s(literal 16 binary64))) (/.f64 (*.f64 a b) #s(literal 4 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 33.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 33.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c}{y}\right)} - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c}{y}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 67.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{c}{y} + x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{c}{y} + x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + \frac{c}{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (fma x y (fma z (/ t 16.0) (/ (* a b) -4.0))) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return fma(x, y, fma(z, (t / 16.0), ((a * b) / -4.0))) + c;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(fma(x, y, fma(z, Float64(t / 16.0), Float64(Float64(a * b) / -4.0))) + c)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(t / 16.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(\frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\right)} + c \]

   2. fma-define 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)} + c \]

   3. associate-/l* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

   4. fmm-def 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, -\frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)}\right) + c \]

   5. distribute-neg-frac2 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot b}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

   6. metadata-eval 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{\color{blue}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

3. Simplified 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 64.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + t \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0625\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ c (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -4e+46)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) -5e-69)
       (+ c (* t (* z 0.0625)))
       (if (<= (* x y) 2e+159) (+ c (* a (* b -0.25))) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = c + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4e+46) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5e-69) {
		tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+159) {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = c + (x * y)
    if ((x * y) <= (-4d+46)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= (-5d-69)) then
        tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625d0))
    else if ((x * y) <= 2d+159) then
        tmp = c + (a * (b * (-0.25d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = c + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4e+46) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5e-69) {
		tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+159) {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	t_1 = c + (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -4e+46:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= -5e-69:
		tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625))
	elif (x * y) <= 2e+159:
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = Float64(c + Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -4e+46)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -5e-69)
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(t * Float64(z * 0.0625)));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+159)
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(a * Float64(b * -0.25)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = c + (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -4e+46)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -5e-69)
		tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625));
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2e+159)
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4e+46], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e-69], N[(c + N[(t * N[(z * 0.0625), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+159], N[(c + N[(a * N[(b * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4e46 or 1.9999999999999999e159 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + x \cdot y} \]

   if -4e46 < (*.f64 x y) < -5.00000000000000033e-69

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 69.4%

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 69.4%

         \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.0625} \]

      2. associate-*r* 69.4%

         \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0625\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 69.4%

         \[\leadsto c + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0625 \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 69.4%

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(0.0625 \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -5.00000000000000033e-69 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.9999999999999999e159

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(\frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\right)} + c \]

      2. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)} + c \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

      4. fmm-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, -\frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)}\right) + c \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot b}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{\color{blue}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 73.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 73.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   7. Simplified 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + t \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0625\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 89.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+131} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+148}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + t\_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c + t\_1\right) - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 0.0625 (* z t))))
   (if (or (<= (* x y) -5e+131) (not (<= (* x y) 2e+148)))
     (+ c (+ (* x y) t_1))
     (- (+ c t_1) (* (* a b) 0.25)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+131) || !((x * y) <= 2e+148)) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 0.0625d0 * (z * t)
    if (((x * y) <= (-5d+131)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 2d+148))) then
        tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1)
    else
        tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+131) || !((x * y) <= 2e+148)) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -5e+131) or not ((x * y) <= 2e+148):
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1)
	else:
		tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = Float64(0.0625 * Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -5e+131) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 2e+148))
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(Float64(x * y) + t_1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c + t_1) - Float64(Float64(a * b) * 0.25));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+131) || ~(((x * y) <= 2e+148)))
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(0.0625 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+131], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+148]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.99999999999999995e131 or 2.0000000000000001e148 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -4.99999999999999995e131 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.0000000000000001e148

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + 0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+131} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+148}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 89.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+97}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -5e+42) (not (<= (* a b) 5e+97)))
   (- (+ c (* x y)) (* (* a b) 0.25))
   (+ c (+ (* x y) (* 0.0625 (* z t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+42) || !((a * b) <= 5e+97)) {
		tmp = (c + (x * y)) - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-5d+42)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 5d+97))) then
        tmp = (c + (x * y)) - ((a * b) * 0.25d0)
    else
        tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625d0 * (z * t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+42) || !((a * b) <= 5e+97)) {
		tmp = (c + (x * y)) - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+42) or not ((a * b) <= 5e+97):
		tmp = (c + (x * y)) - ((a * b) * 0.25)
	else:
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -5e+42) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 5e+97))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c + Float64(x * y)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) * 0.25));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(0.0625 * Float64(z * t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+42) || ~(((a * b) <= 5e+97)))
		tmp = (c + (x * y)) - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	else
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+42], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e+97]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.0625 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -5.00000000000000007e42 or 4.99999999999999999e97 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -5.00000000000000007e42 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.99999999999999999e97

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+97}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 86.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+232}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{+206}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25 + \frac{c}{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -5e+232)
   (+ c (* a (* b -0.25)))
   (if (<= (* a b) 1e+206)
     (+ c (+ (* x y) (* 0.0625 (* z t))))
     (* b (+ (* a -0.25) (/ c b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+232) {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e+206) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = b * ((a * -0.25) + (c / b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-5d+232)) then
        tmp = c + (a * (b * (-0.25d0)))
    else if ((a * b) <= 1d+206) then
        tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625d0 * (z * t)))
    else
        tmp = b * ((a * (-0.25d0)) + (c / b))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+232) {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	} else if ((a * b) <= 1e+206) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = b * ((a * -0.25) + (c / b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -5e+232:
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25))
	elif (a * b) <= 1e+206:
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)))
	else:
		tmp = b * ((a * -0.25) + (c / b))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e+232)
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(a * Float64(b * -0.25)));
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 1e+206)
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(0.0625 * Float64(z * t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(Float64(a * -0.25) + Float64(c / b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+232)
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	elseif ((a * b) <= 1e+206)
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	else
		tmp = b * ((a * -0.25) + (c / b));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+232], N[(c + N[(a * N[(b * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e+206], N[(c + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.0625 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * N[(N[(a * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -4.99999999999999987e232

   1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(\frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\right)} + c \]

      2. fma-define 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)} + c \]

      3. associate-/l* 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

      4. fmm-def 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, -\frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)}\right) + c \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot b}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

      6. metadata-eval 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{\color{blue}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

   3. Simplified 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   7. Simplified 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   if -4.99999999999999987e232 < (*.f64 a b) < 1e206

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 1e206 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 91.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(\frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\right)} + c \]

      2. fma-define 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)} + c \]

      3. associate-/l* 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

      4. fmm-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, -\frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)}\right) + c \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot b}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

      6. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{\color{blue}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   7. Simplified 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot a + \frac{c}{b}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+232}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 10^{+206}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25 + \frac{c}{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 65.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+46} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + t \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0625\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -4e+46) (not (<= (* x y) 4e+56)))
   (+ c (* x y))
   (+ c (* t (* z 0.0625)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4e+46) || !((x * y) <= 4e+56)) {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-4d+46)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 4d+56))) then
        tmp = c + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4e+46) || !((x * y) <= 4e+56)) {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -4e+46) or not ((x * y) <= 4e+56):
		tmp = c + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -4e+46) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 4e+56))
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(t * Float64(z * 0.0625)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -4e+46) || ~(((x * y) <= 4e+56)))
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = c + (t * (z * 0.0625));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4e+46], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 4e+56]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(t * N[(z * 0.0625), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4e46 or 4.00000000000000037e56 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + x \cdot y} \]

   if -4e46 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.00000000000000037e56

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 62.3%

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 62.3%

         \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.0625} \]

      2. associate-*r* 62.3%

         \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0625\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 62.3%

         \[\leadsto c + t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0625 \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 62.3%

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(0.0625 \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+46} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + t \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0625\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 40.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+190} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1e+190) (not (<= (* x y) 2e+94))) (* x y) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+190) || !((x * y) <= 2e+94)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1d+190)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 2d+94))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+190) || !((x * y) <= 2e+94)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+190) or not ((x * y) <= 2e+94):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1e+190) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 2e+94))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = c;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1e+190) || ~(((x * y) <= 2e+94)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+190], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+94]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], c]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.0000000000000001e190 or 2e94 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + x \cdot y} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 80.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.0000000000000001e190 < (*.f64 x y) < 2e94

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 37.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+190} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+94}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 50.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b -1.75e+19) (* b (* a -0.25)) (+ c (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -1.75e+19) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (b <= (-1.75d+19)) then
        tmp = b * (a * (-0.25d0))
    else
        tmp = c + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -1.75e+19) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if b <= -1.75e+19:
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25)
	else:
		tmp = c + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -1.75e+19)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= -1.75e+19)
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	else
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[b, -1.75e+19], N[(b * N[(a * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < -1.75e19

   1. Initial program 95.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(\frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\right)} + c \]

      2. fma-define 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)} + c \]

      3. associate-/l* 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

      4. fmm-def 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, -\frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)}\right) + c \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot b}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

      6. metadata-eval 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{\color{blue}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 64.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   7. Simplified 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   8. Taylor expanded in a around inf 56.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot b + \frac{c}{a}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around inf 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 45.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

   11. Simplified 45.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -1.75e19 < b

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 22.4% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c) :precision binary64 c)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return c
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := c

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 27.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024165 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))