Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 99.0%
Time: 23.9s
Alternatives: 13
Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 13 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{{t\_0}^{-2} + -1}{\frac{1}{t\_0} - -1}\right)\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
          (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))
   (* s (- (log (/ (+ (pow t_0 -2.0) -1.0) (- (/ 1.0 t_0) -1.0)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = (u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))));
	return s * -logf(((powf(t_0, -2.0f) + -1.0f) / ((1.0f / t_0) - -1.0f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32((t_0 ^ Float32(-2.0)) + Float32(-1.0)) / Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / t_0) - Float32(-1.0))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = (u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))));
	tmp = s * -log((((t_0 ^ single(-2.0)) + single(-1.0)) / ((single(1.0) / t_0) - single(-1.0))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{{t\_0}^{-2} + -1}{\frac{1}{t\_0} - -1}\right)\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \pi}}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. add-sqr-sqrt99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1 \cdot \pi}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    3. times-frac99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. flip-+99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}} - -1 \cdot -1}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}} - -1}\right)} \]
  7. Applied egg-rr99.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{{\left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{-2} - 1}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - -1}\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{{\left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{-2} + -1}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - -1}\right)\right) \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-2 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log1p
    (+
     -2.0
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -log1pf((-2.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log1p(Float32(Float32(-2.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-2 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \pi}}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. add-sqr-sqrt99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1 \cdot \pi}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    3. times-frac99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log1p-expm1-u99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-undefine99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}} + -1\right)} - 1}\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr99.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) - 1\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--l+99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1 - 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. metadata-eval99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]
  9. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -2\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-2 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+ (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 25.2% accurate, 2.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\left(\log s - \frac{s}{\pi}\right) - \log \pi\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (- (log s) (/ s PI)) (log PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * ((logf(s) - (s / ((float) M_PI))) - logf(((float) M_PI)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(log(s) - Float32(s / Float32(pi))) - log(Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * ((log(s) - (s / single(pi))) - log(single(pi)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\left(\log s - \frac{s}{\pi}\right) - \log \pi\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log1p-define25.4%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    3. neg-mul-125.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  7. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \pi + \left(-1 \cdot \log s + \frac{s}{\pi}\right)\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification25.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\left(\log s - \frac{s}{\pi}\right) - \log \pi\right) \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 25.2% accurate, 2.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log s) (log PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (logf(s) - logf(((float) M_PI)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(log(s) - log(Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (log(s) - log(single(pi)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log1p-define25.4%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    3. neg-mul-125.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  7. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \left(\log \pi + -1 \cdot \log s\right)\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*25.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \left(\log \pi + -1 \cdot \log s\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-125.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \left(\log \pi + -1 \cdot \log s\right) \]
    3. mul-1-neg25.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\log \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-\log s\right)}\right) \]
  10. Simplified25.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\log \pi + \left(-\log s\right)\right)} \]
  11. Final simplification25.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log s - \log \pi\right) \]
  12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 25.1% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\\ 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{t\_0} - s \cdot \log t\_0 \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (+ 1.0 (/ PI s)))) (- (* 2.0 (/ (* u PI) t_0)) (* s (log t_0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s);
	return (2.0f * ((u * ((float) M_PI)) / t_0)) - (s * logf(t_0));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s))
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) / t_0)) - Float32(s * log(t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) + (single(pi) / s);
	tmp = (single(2.0) * ((u * single(pi)) / t_0)) - (s * log(t_0));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\\
2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{t\_0} - s \cdot \log t\_0
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. pow125.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, u \cdot \pi, \pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow125.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, u \cdot \pi, \pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Simplified25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right) + u \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} \]
  10. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 25.1% accurate, 3.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 - \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- s) (log (+ 1.0 (* 4.0 (/ (- (* (* u PI) -0.25) (* PI -0.25)) s))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((1.0f + (4.0f * ((((u * ((float) M_PI)) * -0.25f) - (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f)) / s))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(-0.25)) - Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25))) / s)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(1.0) + (single(4.0) * ((((u * single(pi)) * single(-0.25)) - (single(pi) * single(-0.25))) / s))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 - \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}}{s}\right) \]
  7. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}}{s}\right) \]
  8. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25 - \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 25.1% accurate, 4.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log (+ 1.0 (/ PI s))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(1.0) + (single(pi) / s)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. pow125.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, u \cdot \pi, \pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow125.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, u \cdot \pi, \pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Simplified25.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right) + u \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 25.1% accurate, 4.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (log1p (/ PI s))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log1p-define25.4%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    3. neg-mul-125.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  7. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 11.6% accurate, 22.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (+ (* u (+ (* PI -0.25) (* 0.25 (/ PI u)))) (* PI (* u -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * ((u * ((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f) + (0.25f * (((float) M_PI) / u)))) + (((float) M_PI) * (u * -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(Float32(pi) / u)))) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * ((u * ((single(pi) * single(-0.25)) + (single(0.25) * (single(pi) / u)))) + (single(pi) * (u * single(-0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. *-commutative12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    9. *-commutative12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified12.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around inf 12.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right)} + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \]
  8. Final simplification12.3%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 11.6% accurate, 61.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2\right) - \pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- (* PI (* u 2.0)) PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (((float) M_PI) * (u * 2.0f)) - ((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(u * Float32(2.0))) - Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = (single(pi) * (u * single(2.0))) - single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2\right) - \pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. *-commutative12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    9. *-commutative12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*12.3%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified12.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-112.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\pi\right)} + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \]
    2. +-commutative12.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-\pi\right)} \]
    3. unsub-neg12.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi} \]
    4. associate-*r*12.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} - \pi \]
  9. Simplified12.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \pi} \]
  10. Final simplification12.3%

    \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2\right) - \pi \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 11.4% accurate, 72.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)}{s} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (/ (* s (- PI)) s))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (s * -((float) M_PI)) / s;
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(s * Float32(-Float32(pi))) / s)
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = (s * -single(pi)) / s;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)}{s}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/12.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-s\right) \cdot \pi}{s}} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-s\right) \cdot \pi}{s}} \]
  7. Final simplification12.1%

    \[\leadsto \frac{s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)}{s} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 11.4% accurate, 216.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-112.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024165 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))