Difference of squares

Percentage Accurate: 93.6% → 98.6%
Time: 4.9s
Alternatives: 4
Speedup: 0.6×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot a - b \cdot b \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (- (* a a) (* b b)))
double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a * a) - (b * b);
}
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (a * a) - (b * b)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a * a) - (b * b);
}
def code(a, b):
	return (a * a) - (b * b)
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a * a) - Float64(b * b))
end
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = (a * a) - (b * b);
end
code[a_, b_] := N[(N[(a * a), $MachinePrecision] - N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
a \cdot a - b \cdot b
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 4 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 93.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot a - b \cdot b \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (- (* a a) (* b b)))
double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a * a) - (b * b);
}
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (a * a) - (b * b)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a * a) - (b * b);
}
def code(a, b):
	return (a * a) - (b * b)
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a * a) - Float64(b * b))
end
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = (a * a) - (b * b);
end
code[a_, b_] := N[(N[(a * a), $MachinePrecision] - N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
a \cdot a - b \cdot b
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} a_m = \left|a\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a\_m \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+232}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a\_m, a\_m, b \cdot \left(-b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
a_m = (fabs.f64 a)
(FPCore (a_m b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a_m 7.8e+232) (fma a_m a_m (* b (- b))) (* a_m a_m)))
a_m = fabs(a);
double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a_m <= 7.8e+232) {
		tmp = fma(a_m, a_m, (b * -b));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = abs(a)
function code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a_m <= 7.8e+232)
		tmp = fma(a_m, a_m, Float64(b * Float64(-b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m * a_m);
	end
	return tmp
end
a_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$m_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a$95$m, 7.8e+232], N[(a$95$m * a$95$m + N[(b * (-b)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
a_m = \left|a\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;a\_m \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+232}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a\_m, a\_m, b \cdot \left(-b\right)\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if a < 7.7999999999999998e232

    1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sqr-neg96.2%

        \[\leadsto a \cdot a - \color{blue}{\left(-b\right) \cdot \left(-b\right)} \]
      2. cancel-sign-sub96.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot a + b \cdot \left(-b\right)} \]
      3. fma-define98.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, a, b \cdot \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
    3. Simplified98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, a, b \cdot \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 7.7999999999999998e232 < a

    1. Initial program 72.7%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. difference-of-squares100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right)} \]
      2. sub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
      3. add-sqr-sqrt31.8%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-b} \cdot \sqrt{-b}}\right) \]
      4. sqrt-unprod95.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-b\right) \cdot \left(-b\right)}}\right) \]
      5. sqr-neg95.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \sqrt{\color{blue}{b \cdot b}}\right) \]
      6. sqrt-prod63.6%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{b} \cdot \sqrt{b}}\right) \]
      7. add-sqr-sqrt95.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{b}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + b\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \cdot a \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.1% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} a_m = \left|a\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a\_m \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m - b \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
a_m = (fabs.f64 a)
(FPCore (a_m b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a_m 4.2e+139) (- (* a_m a_m) (* b b)) (* a_m a_m)))
a_m = fabs(a);
double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a_m <= 4.2e+139) {
		tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b);
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = abs(a)
real(8) function code(a_m, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a_m <= 4.2d+139) then
        tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b)
    else
        tmp = a_m * a_m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
a_m = Math.abs(a);
public static double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a_m <= 4.2e+139) {
		tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b);
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = math.fabs(a)
def code(a_m, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a_m <= 4.2e+139:
		tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b)
	else:
		tmp = a_m * a_m
	return tmp
a_m = abs(a)
function code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a_m <= 4.2e+139)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a_m * a_m) - Float64(b * b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m * a_m);
	end
	return tmp
end
a_m = abs(a);
function tmp_2 = code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a_m <= 4.2e+139)
		tmp = (a_m * a_m) - (b * b);
	else
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
a_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$m_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a$95$m, 4.2e+139], N[(N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
a_m = \left|a\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;a\_m \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\
\;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m - b \cdot b\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if a < 4.1999999999999997e139

    1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    if 4.1999999999999997e139 < a

    1. Initial program 77.5%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. difference-of-squares100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right)} \]
      2. sub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
      3. add-sqr-sqrt42.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-b} \cdot \sqrt{-b}}\right) \]
      4. sqrt-unprod92.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-b\right) \cdot \left(-b\right)}}\right) \]
      5. sqr-neg92.5%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \sqrt{\color{blue}{b \cdot b}}\right) \]
      6. sqrt-prod50.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{b} \cdot \sqrt{b}}\right) \]
      7. add-sqr-sqrt90.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{b}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + b\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \cdot a \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 78.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} a_m = \left|a\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a\_m \cdot a\_m \leq 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(-b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
a_m = (fabs.f64 a)
(FPCore (a_m b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a_m a_m) 1e+22) (* b (- b)) (* a_m a_m)))
a_m = fabs(a);
double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a_m * a_m) <= 1e+22) {
		tmp = b * -b;
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = abs(a)
real(8) function code(a_m, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a_m * a_m) <= 1d+22) then
        tmp = b * -b
    else
        tmp = a_m * a_m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
a_m = Math.abs(a);
public static double code(double a_m, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a_m * a_m) <= 1e+22) {
		tmp = b * -b;
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	}
	return tmp;
}
a_m = math.fabs(a)
def code(a_m, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a_m * a_m) <= 1e+22:
		tmp = b * -b
	else:
		tmp = a_m * a_m
	return tmp
a_m = abs(a)
function code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a_m * a_m) <= 1e+22)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(-b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m * a_m);
	end
	return tmp
end
a_m = abs(a);
function tmp_2 = code(a_m, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a_m * a_m) <= 1e+22)
		tmp = b * -b;
	else
		tmp = a_m * a_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
a_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$m_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 1e+22], N[(b * (-b)), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
a_m = \left|a\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;a\_m \cdot a\_m \leq 10^{+22}:\\
\;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(-b\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot a\_m\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 a a) < 1e22

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot {b}^{2}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-183.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-{b}^{2}} \]
    5. Simplified83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-{b}^{2}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow283.5%

        \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{b \cdot b} \]
      2. distribute-lft-neg-in83.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-b\right) \cdot b} \]
    7. Applied egg-rr83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-b\right) \cdot b} \]

    if 1e22 < (*.f64 a a)

    1. Initial program 87.0%

      \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. difference-of-squares100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right)} \]
      2. sub-neg100.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
      3. add-sqr-sqrt52.2%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-b} \cdot \sqrt{-b}}\right) \]
      4. sqrt-unprod87.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-b\right) \cdot \left(-b\right)}}\right) \]
      5. sqr-neg87.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \sqrt{\color{blue}{b \cdot b}}\right) \]
      6. sqrt-prod38.3%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{b} \cdot \sqrt{b}}\right) \]
      7. add-sqr-sqrt78.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{b}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + b\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \cdot a \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification81.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot a \leq 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(-b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot a\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 53.8% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} a_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_m \cdot a\_m \end{array} \]
a_m = (fabs.f64 a)
(FPCore (a_m b) :precision binary64 (* a_m a_m))
a_m = fabs(a);
double code(double a_m, double b) {
	return a_m * a_m;
}
a_m = abs(a)
real(8) function code(a_m, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a_m * a_m
end function
a_m = Math.abs(a);
public static double code(double a_m, double b) {
	return a_m * a_m;
}
a_m = math.fabs(a)
def code(a_m, b):
	return a_m * a_m
a_m = abs(a)
function code(a_m, b)
	return Float64(a_m * a_m)
end
a_m = abs(a);
function tmp = code(a_m, b)
	tmp = a_m * a_m;
end
a_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$m_, b_] := N[(a$95$m * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
a_m = \left|a\right|

\\
a\_m \cdot a\_m
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 94.1%

    \[a \cdot a - b \cdot b \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. difference-of-squares100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right)} \]
    2. sub-neg100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(-b\right)\right)} \]
    3. add-sqr-sqrt46.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-b} \cdot \sqrt{-b}}\right) \]
    4. sqrt-unprod73.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-b\right) \cdot \left(-b\right)}}\right) \]
    5. sqr-neg73.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \sqrt{\color{blue}{b \cdot b}}\right) \]
    6. sqrt-prod27.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\sqrt{b} \cdot \sqrt{b}}\right) \]
    7. add-sqr-sqrt51.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{b}\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr51.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a + b\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 55.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(a + b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 52.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \cdot a \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (* (+ a b) (- a b)))
double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a + b) * (a - b);
}
real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (a + b) * (a - b)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return (a + b) * (a - b);
}
def code(a, b):
	return (a + b) * (a - b)
function code(a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(a + b) * Float64(a - b))
end
function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = (a + b) * (a - b);
end
code[a_, b_] := N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * N[(a - b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(a + b\right) \cdot \left(a - b\right)
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024163 
(FPCore (a b)
  :name "Difference of squares"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (* (+ a b) (- a b)))

  (- (* a a) (* b b)))