math.exp on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 6.8s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 92.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 1.0001\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (exp re) 5e-8) (not (<= (exp re) 1.0001))) (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((exp(re) <= 5e-8) || !(exp(re) <= 1.0001)) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((exp(re) <= 5d-8) .or. (.not. (exp(re) <= 1.0001d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.exp(re) <= 5e-8) || !(Math.exp(re) <= 1.0001)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.exp(re) <= 5e-8) or not (math.exp(re) <= 1.0001):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((exp(re) <= 5e-8) || !(exp(re) <= 1.0001))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((exp(re) <= 5e-8) || ~((exp(re) <= 1.0001)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 5e-8], N[Not[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 1.0001]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 re) < 4.9999999999999998e-8 or 1.00009999999999999 < (exp.f64 re)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if 4.9999999999999998e-8 < (exp.f64 re) < 1.00009999999999999

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 1.0001\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.0% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.035 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 8000000\right) \land re \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -0.035) (and (not (<= re 8000000.0)) (<= re 1.05e+103)))
   (exp re)
   (*
    (cos im)
    (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.035) || (!(re <= 8000000.0) && (re <= 1.05e+103))) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-0.035d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 8000000.0d0)) .and. (re <= 1.05d+103)) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.035) || (!(re <= 8000000.0) && (re <= 1.05e+103))) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -0.035) or (not (re <= 8000000.0) and (re <= 1.05e+103)):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -0.035) || (!(re <= 8000000.0) && (re <= 1.05e+103)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -0.035) || (~((re <= 8000000.0)) && (re <= 1.05e+103)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -0.035], And[N[Not[LessEqual[re, 8000000.0]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[re, 1.05e+103]]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -0.035000000000000003 or 8e6 < re < 1.0500000000000001e103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -0.035000000000000003 < re < 8e6 or 1.0500000000000001e103 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.035 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 8000000\right) \land re \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 96.3% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.0014:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -0.0014)
   (exp re)
   (if (<= re 2.5e-5)
     (* (cos im) (+ re 1.0))
     (if (<= re 1.9e+154)
       (exp re)
       (* (cos im) (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -0.0014) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else if (re <= 2.5e-5) {
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	} else if (re <= 1.9e+154) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-0.0014d0)) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else if (re <= 2.5d-5) then
        tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0d0)
    else if (re <= 1.9d+154) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -0.0014) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else if (re <= 2.5e-5) {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	} else if (re <= 1.9e+154) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -0.0014:
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	elif re <= 2.5e-5:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0)
	elif re <= 1.9e+154:
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -0.0014)
		tmp = exp(re);
	elseif (re <= 2.5e-5)
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(re + 1.0));
	elseif (re <= 1.9e+154)
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -0.0014)
		tmp = exp(re);
	elseif (re <= 2.5e-5)
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	elseif (re <= 1.9e+154)
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -0.0014], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 2.5e-5], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 1.9e+154], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -0.00139999999999999999 or 2.50000000000000012e-5 < re < 1.8999999999999999e154

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -0.00139999999999999999 < re < 2.50000000000000012e-5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im + re \cdot \cos im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

   if 1.8999999999999999e154 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.0014:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 93.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.000125 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.000125\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -0.000125) (not (<= re 0.000125)))
   (exp re)
   (* (cos im) (+ re 1.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.000125) || !(re <= 0.000125)) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-0.000125d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.000125d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.000125) || !(re <= 0.000125)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -0.000125) or not (re <= 0.000125):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -0.000125) || !(re <= 0.000125))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(re + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -0.000125) || ~((re <= 0.000125)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -0.000125], N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.000125]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -1.25e-4 or 1.25e-4 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -1.25e-4 < re < 1.25e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im + re \cdot \cos im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.000125 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.000125\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 63.3% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 7.1 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 7.1e-7)
   (cos im)
   (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 7.1e-7) {
		tmp = cos(im);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 7.1d-7) then
        tmp = cos(im)
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 7.1e-7) {
		tmp = Math.cos(im);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 7.1e-7:
		tmp = math.cos(im)
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 7.1e-7)
		tmp = cos(im);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 7.1e-7)
		tmp = cos(im);
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 7.1e-7], N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < 7.0999999999999998e-7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   if 7.0999999999999998e-7 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 55.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 72.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   6. Simplified 55.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 41.4% accurate, 15.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 68.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 42.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

6. Simplified 42.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 31.2% accurate, 16.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-87}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot im\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 1.55e-87) 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* im im)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 1.55e-87) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 1.55d-87) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (im * im))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 1.55e-87) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 1.55e-87:
		tmp = 1.0
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 1.55e-87)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * im)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 1.55e-87)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 1.55e-87], 1.0, N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < 1.54999999999999999e-87

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 38.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

   if 1.54999999999999999e-87 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 26.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 20.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + -0.5 \cdot {im}^{2}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 20.8%

         \[\leadsto 1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 20.8%

      \[\leadsto 1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 38.3% accurate, 22.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 68.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

6. Simplified 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 29.1% accurate, 67.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ re + 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ re 1.0))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return re + 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = re + 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return re + 1.0;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return re + 1.0

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(re + 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = re + 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 68.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 30.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]

6. Simplified 30.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 28.6% accurate, 203.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 68.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 29.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024163 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.exp on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (* (exp re) (cos im)))