Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 7.3s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* x y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (x * y)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(x * y)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-111}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -7.5e+22)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= y 2.6e-111)
     z
     (if (<= y 1.65e-43) (* x 0.5) (if (<= y 6.5e+16) z (* x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -7.5e+22) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 2.6e-111) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 1.65e-43) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 6.5e+16) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-7.5d+22)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (y <= 2.6d-111) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 1.65d-43) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else if (y <= 6.5d+16) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -7.5e+22) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 2.6e-111) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 1.65e-43) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 6.5e+16) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -7.5e+22:
		tmp = x * y
	elif y <= 2.6e-111:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 1.65e-43:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	elif y <= 6.5e+16:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -7.5e+22)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (y <= 2.6e-111)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 1.65e-43)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	elseif (y <= 6.5e+16)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -7.5e+22)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (y <= 2.6e-111)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 1.65e-43)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	elseif (y <= 6.5e+16)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -7.5e+22], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.6e-111], z, If[LessEqual[y, 1.65e-43], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 6.5e+16], z, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -7.5000000000000002e22 or 6.5e16 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -7.5000000000000002e22 < y < 2.59999999999999982e-111 or 1.65000000000000008e-43 < y < 6.5e16

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 2.59999999999999982e-111 < y < 1.65000000000000008e-43

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 70.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

   8. Simplified 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.55 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3.55e+21) (not (<= y 1.16e-18)))
   (+ z (* x y))
   (- z (* x -0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.55e+21) || !(y <= 1.16e-18)) {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3.55d+21)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.16d-18))) then
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = z - (x * (-0.5d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3.55e+21) || !(y <= 1.16e-18)) {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3.55e+21) or not (y <= 1.16e-18):
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3.55e+21) || !(y <= 1.16e-18))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3.55e+21) || ~((y <= 1.16e-18)))
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = z - (x * -0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3.55e+21], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.16e-18]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(x * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.55e21 or 1.16e-18 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right) + \frac{-x}{2}\right)} \]

      8. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

      10. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - x \cdot y\right)} \]

      11. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot -1}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      13. associate-/l* 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right) + z} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)}\right) + z \]

      4. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]

   if -3.55e21 < y < 1.16e-18

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right) + \frac{-x}{2}\right)} \]

      8. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

      10. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - x \cdot y\right)} \]

      11. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot -1}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      13. associate-/l* 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.5} \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot -0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.55 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -0.5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-61}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1e-11) (not (<= z 3.6e-61))) (+ z (* x y)) (* x (+ y 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1e-11) || !(z <= 3.6e-61)) {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1d-11)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.6d-61))) then
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1e-11) || !(z <= 3.6e-61)) {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1e-11) or not (z <= 3.6e-61):
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1e-11) || !(z <= 3.6e-61))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1e-11) || ~((z <= 3.6e-61)))
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1e-11], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.6e-61]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -9.99999999999999939e-12 or 3.60000000000000014e-61 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

      6. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right) + \frac{-x}{2}\right)} \]

      8. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

      10. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - x \cdot y\right)} \]

      11. neg-mul-1 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot -1}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      13. associate-/l* 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} - x \cdot y\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

      15. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 90.1%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 90.1%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 90.1%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 90.1%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right) + z} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)}\right) + z \]

      4. remove-double-neg 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]

   if -9.99999999999999939e-12 < z < 3.60000000000000014e-61

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-61}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 72.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{-40} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -9.6e-40) (not (<= x 1.05e+18))) (* x (+ y 0.5)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9.6e-40) || !(x <= 1.05e+18)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-9.6d-40)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.05d+18))) then
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9.6e-40) || !(x <= 1.05e+18)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -9.6e-40) or not (x <= 1.05e+18):
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -9.6e-40) || !(x <= 1.05e+18))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -9.6e-40) || ~((x <= 1.05e+18)))
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -9.6e-40], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.05e+18]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -9.59999999999999965e-40 or 1.05e18 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   if -9.59999999999999965e-40 < x < 1.05e18

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{-40} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-60}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.4e-14) z (if (<= z 3.7e-60) (* x 0.5) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4e-14) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 3.7e-60) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.4d-14)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 3.7d-60) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4e-14) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 3.7e-60) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.4e-14:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 3.7e-60:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.4e-14)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 3.7e-60)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.4e-14)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 3.7e-60)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.4e-14], z, If[LessEqual[z, 3.7e-60], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], z]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.3999999999999997e-14 or 3.70000000000000025e-60 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 61.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -5.3999999999999997e-14 < z < 3.70000000000000025e-60

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 40.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 40.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

   8. Simplified 40.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + x \cdot \left(y - -0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (* x (- y -0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - -0.5));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + (x * (y - (-0.5d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - -0.5));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + (x * (y - -0.5))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + Float64(x * Float64(y - -0.5)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + (x * (y - -0.5));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * N[(y - -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-neg-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) \]

   4. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{2}} + \left(-y \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}\right)\right) \]

   6. unsub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   7. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right) + \frac{-x}{2}\right)} \]

   8. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} + y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   9. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{-x}{2} + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

   10. cancel-sign-sub-inv 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-x}{2} - x \cdot y\right)} \]

   11. neg-mul-1 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

   12. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot -1}}{2} - x \cdot y\right) \]

   13. associate-/l* 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-1}{2}} - x \cdot y\right) \]

   14. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{2} - y\right)} \]

   15. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5} - y\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(-0.5 - y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + x \cdot \left(y - -0.5\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 40.9% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(y \cdot x + z\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{2} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{2} + \left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024160 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))