Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 90.0% → 96.1%

Time: 14.4s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 0.5×

• 46.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.1% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \frac{i}{c}, b \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))))
   (if (<= (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- (fma x y (* z t)) (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* -2.0 (* (pow c 2.0) (fma a (/ i c) (* b i)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double tmp;
	if ((((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (fma(x, y, (z * t)) - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (pow(c, 2.0) * fma(a, (i / c), (b * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64((c ^ 2.0) * fma(a, Float64(i / c), Float64(b * i))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 * N[(N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(a * N[(i / c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 5.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 5.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 17.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 17.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 17.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 17.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{c}^{2} \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \left(b \cdot i\right) + -2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 53.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \left(b \cdot i\right) + -2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right) \cdot {c}^{2}} \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 53.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \left(b \cdot i + \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)\right)} \cdot {c}^{2} \]

      3. associate-*l* 53.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(\left(b \cdot i + \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right) \cdot {c}^{2}\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 53.0%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(b \cdot i + \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 53.0%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{a \cdot i}{c} + b \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      6. associate-/l* 64.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{i}{c}} + b \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      7. fma-define 64.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \frac{i}{c}, b \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 64.7%

         \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \frac{i}{c}, \color{blue}{i \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \frac{i}{c}, i \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \frac{i}{c}, b \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.1% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(-b\right) - \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))))
   (if (<= (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- (fma x y (* z t)) (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* 2.0 (* (* i (pow c 2.0)) (- (- b) (/ a c)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double tmp;
	if ((((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (fma(x, y, (z * t)) - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((i * pow(c, 2.0)) * (-b - (a / c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * t)) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(i * (c ^ 2.0)) * Float64(Float64(-b) - Float64(a / c))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(i * N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[((-b) - N[(a / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 0.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in c around inf 53.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot i}{c} - b \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 53.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot i}{c} + \left(-b \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 53.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-b \cdot i\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)}\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 53.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(\left(-b \cdot i\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-*l/ 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(\left(-b \cdot i\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{a}{c} \cdot i}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-in 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(b \cdot i + \frac{a}{c} \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. distribute-rgt-in 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{i \cdot \left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right) \cdot i}\right)\right) \]

      8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-{c}^{2} \cdot \left(\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-{c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot \left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. associate-*r* 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)}\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-neg-in 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(-\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      12. *-commutative 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right)} \cdot \left(-\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\right) \]

   6. Simplified 58.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right) \cdot \left(-\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(-b\right) - \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.1% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(-b\right) - \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* 2.0 (* (* i (pow c 2.0)) (- (- b) (/ a c)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((i * pow(c, 2.0)) * (-b - (a / c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((i * Math.pow(c, 2.0)) * (-b - (a / c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((i * math.pow(c, 2.0)) * (-b - (a / c)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(i * (c ^ 2.0)) * Float64(Float64(-b) - Float64(a / c))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((i * (c ^ 2.0)) * (-b - (a / c)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(i * N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[((-b) - N[(a / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 0.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in c around inf 53.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot i}{c} - b \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 53.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot i}{c} + \left(-b \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 53.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-b \cdot i\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)}\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 53.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(\left(-b \cdot i\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{a \cdot i}{c}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-*l/ 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(\left(-b \cdot i\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{a}{c} \cdot i}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-in 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(b \cdot i + \frac{a}{c} \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. distribute-rgt-in 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{i \cdot \left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right) \cdot i}\right)\right) \]

      8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-{c}^{2} \cdot \left(\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-{c}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot \left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. associate-*r* 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)}\right) \]

      11. distribute-rgt-neg-in 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right) \cdot \left(-\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\right)} \]

      12. *-commutative 58.9%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right)} \cdot \left(-\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\right) \]

   6. Simplified 58.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right) \cdot \left(-\left(b + \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(i \cdot {c}^{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(-b\right) - \frac{a}{c}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.5% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ t_3 := 2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - t\_2\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+294}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c)))
        (t_2 (* (* c t_1) i))
        (t_3 (* 2.0 (- (* x y) t_2))))
   (if (<= t_2 -5e+65)
     t_3
     (if (<= t_2 1e+31)
       (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)
       (if (<= t_2 4e+294) t_3 (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double t_3 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -5e+65) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if (t_2 <= 1e+31) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else if (t_2 <= 4e+294) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: t_3
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a + (b * c)
    t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
    t_3 = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - t_2)
    if (t_2 <= (-5d+65)) then
        tmp = t_3
    else if (t_2 <= 1d+31) then
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    else if (t_2 <= 4d+294) then
        tmp = t_3
    else
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (t_1 * i))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double t_3 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2);
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -5e+65) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if (t_2 <= 1e+31) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else if (t_2 <= 4e+294) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
	t_3 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2)
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= -5e+65:
		tmp = t_3
	elif t_2 <= 1e+31:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	elif t_2 <= 4e+294:
		tmp = t_3
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	t_3 = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - t_2))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= -5e+65)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif (t_2 <= 1e+31)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	elseif (t_2 <= 4e+294)
		tmp = t_3;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	t_3 = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= -5e+65)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif (t_2 <= 1e+31)
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	elseif (t_2 <= 4e+294)
		tmp = t_3;
	else
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$3 = N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -5e+65], t$95$3, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 1e+31], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 4e+294], t$95$3, N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -4.99999999999999973e65 or 9.9999999999999996e30 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 4.00000000000000027e294

   1. Initial program 85.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 79.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   if -4.99999999999999973e65 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 9.9999999999999996e30

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 4.00000000000000027e294 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 72.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 72.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 72.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+294}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 94.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t\_2 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+294}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - t\_2\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)))
   (if (or (<= t_2 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_2 4e+294)))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i)))
     (* (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) t_2) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_2 <= 4e+294)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_2 <= 4e+294)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 <= -math.inf) or not (t_2 <= 4e+294):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	else:
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_2 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_2 <= 4e+294))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 <= -Inf) || ~((t_2 <= 4e+294)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	else
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_2) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$2, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$2, 4e+294]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -inf.0 or 4.00000000000000027e294 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 71.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 72.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 72.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 84.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 4.00000000000000027e294

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+294}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 87.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+278} \lor \neg \left(t\_2 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+239}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)))
   (if (or (<= t_2 -1e+278) (not (<= t_2 2e+239)))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i)))
     (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a (* c i)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+278) || !(t_2 <= 2e+239)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (a * (c * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a + (b * c)
    t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
    if ((t_2 <= (-1d+278)) .or. (.not. (t_2 <= 2d+239))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (t_1 * i))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (a * (c * i)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+278) || !(t_2 <= 2e+239)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (a * (c * i)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 <= -1e+278) or not (t_2 <= 2e+239):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (a * (c * i)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+278) || !(t_2 <= 2e+239))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(a * Float64(c * i))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (c * t_1) * i;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 <= -1e+278) || ~((t_2 <= 2e+239)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (a * (c * i)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$2, -1e+278], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$2, 2e+239]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -9.99999999999999964e277 or 1.99999999999999998e239 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 73.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 74.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 74.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 83.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999964e277 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 1.99999999999999998e239

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 90.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+278} \lor \neg \left(\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+239}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 96.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 5.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 5.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 17.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 17.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 17.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 17.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 49.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-73}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* -2.0 (* c (* b (* c i))))))
   (if (<= c -1.8e-14)
     t_1
     (if (<= c 9e-73)
       (* x (* y 2.0))
       (if (<= c 3.8e+55) (* 2.0 (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -1.8e-14) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (c <= 9e-73) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else if (c <= 3.8e+55) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (-2.0d0) * (c * (b * (c * i)))
    if (c <= (-1.8d-14)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (c <= 9d-73) then
        tmp = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    else if (c <= 3.8d+55) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -1.8e-14) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (c <= 9e-73) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else if (c <= 3.8e+55) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)))
	tmp = 0
	if c <= -1.8e-14:
		tmp = t_1
	elif c <= 9e-73:
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0)
	elif c <= 3.8e+55:
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -1.8e-14)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (c <= 9e-73)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0));
	elseif (c <= 3.8e+55)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (c <= -1.8e-14)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (c <= 9e-73)
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	elseif (c <= 3.8e+55)
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -1.8e-14], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[c, 9e-73], N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, 3.8e+55], N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if c < -1.7999999999999999e-14 or 3.8e55 < c

   1. Initial program 77.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 78.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 78.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 88.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 88.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 56.0%

      \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

   if -1.7999999999999999e-14 < c < 9e-73

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 91.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 91.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 91.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 52.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 52.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 52.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if 9e-73 < c < 3.8e55

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 44.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-73}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 37.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-229}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -1.4e+118)
   (* -2.0 (* a (* c i)))
   (if (<= a -1.7e-229)
     (* x (* y 2.0))
     (if (<= a 4.2e+65) (* 2.0 (* z t)) (* i (* c (* a -2.0)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.4e+118) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else if (a <= -1.7e-229) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else if (a <= 4.2e+65) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = i * (c * (a * -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-1.4d+118)) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (a * (c * i))
    else if (a <= (-1.7d-229)) then
        tmp = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    else if (a <= 4.2d+65) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
    else
        tmp = i * (c * (a * (-2.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.4e+118) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else if (a <= -1.7e-229) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else if (a <= 4.2e+65) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = i * (c * (a * -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -1.4e+118:
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i))
	elif a <= -1.7e-229:
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0)
	elif a <= 4.2e+65:
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = i * (c * (a * -2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.4e+118)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(a * Float64(c * i)));
	elseif (a <= -1.7e-229)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0));
	elseif (a <= 4.2e+65)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * Float64(c * Float64(a * -2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -1.4e+118)
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	elseif (a <= -1.7e-229)
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	elseif (a <= 4.2e+65)
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	else
		tmp = i * (c * (a * -2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1.4e+118], N[(-2.0 * N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, -1.7e-229], N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 4.2e+65], N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * N[(c * N[(a * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if a < -1.39999999999999993e118

   1. Initial program 77.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 77.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 86.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 86.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 86.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.39999999999999993e118 < a < -1.7e-229

   1. Initial program 90.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 90.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 41.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 41.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 41.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if -1.7e-229 < a < 4.19999999999999983e65

   1. Initial program 91.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 40.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 4.19999999999999983e65 < a

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 87.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 89.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 89.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 89.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 89.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around inf 78.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right) - \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0 49.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 49.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot a\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)} \]

       2. associate-*r* 49.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-2 \cdot a\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i} \]

       3. associate-*r* 49.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i \]

       4. *-commutative 49.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)} \]

       5. associate-*r* 49.2%

          \[\leadsto i \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-2 \cdot a\right) \cdot c\right)} \]

       6. *-commutative 49.2%

          \[\leadsto i \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(-2 \cdot a\right)\right)} \]

       7. *-commutative 49.2%

          \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot -2\right)}\right) \]

   11. Simplified 49.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-229}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(a \cdot -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 37.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := -2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-229}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* -2.0 (* a (* c i)))))
   (if (<= a -2.6e+118)
     t_1
     (if (<= a -1.9e-229)
       (* x (* y 2.0))
       (if (<= a 1.35e+65) (* 2.0 (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.6e+118) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -1.9e-229) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else if (a <= 1.35e+65) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (-2.0d0) * (a * (c * i))
    if (a <= (-2.6d+118)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (a <= (-1.9d-229)) then
        tmp = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    else if (a <= 1.35d+65) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.6e+118) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -1.9e-229) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else if (a <= 1.35e+65) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = -2.0 * (a * (c * i))
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -2.6e+118:
		tmp = t_1
	elif a <= -1.9e-229:
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0)
	elif a <= 1.35e+65:
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(a * Float64(c * i)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -2.6e+118)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -1.9e-229)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0));
	elseif (a <= 1.35e+65)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -2.6e+118)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -1.9e-229)
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	elseif (a <= 1.35e+65)
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(-2.0 * N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -2.6e+118], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, -1.9e-229], N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 1.35e+65], N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -2.60000000000000016e118 or 1.35000000000000009e65 < a

   1. Initial program 83.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 83.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 83.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 85.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 85.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 85.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 55.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.60000000000000016e118 < a < -1.9000000000000001e-229

   1. Initial program 90.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 90.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 41.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 41.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 41.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if -1.9000000000000001e-229 < a < 1.35000000000000009e65

   1. Initial program 91.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 93.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 93.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 40.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-229}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 74.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{-15} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -8.4e-15) (not (<= c 2.15e+37)))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i)))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -8.4e-15) || !(c <= 2.15e+37)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-8.4d-15)) .or. (.not. (c <= 2.15d+37))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -8.4e-15) || !(c <= 2.15e+37)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -8.4e-15) or not (c <= 2.15e+37):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -8.4e-15) || !(c <= 2.15e+37))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -8.4e-15) || ~((c <= 2.15e+37)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -8.4e-15], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 2.15e+37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -8.39999999999999923e-15 or 2.1499999999999998e37 < c

   1. Initial program 77.6%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 78.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 78.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 88.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 88.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -8.39999999999999923e-15 < c < 2.1499999999999998e37

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 92.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 92.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 78.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{-15} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 68.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+107} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+141}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -1.9e+107) (not (<= c 1.12e+141)))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* b (* c i))))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.9e+107) || !(c <= 1.12e+141)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-1.9d+107)) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.12d+141))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (b * (c * i)))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.9e+107) || !(c <= 1.12e+141)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -1.9e+107) or not (c <= 1.12e+141):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -1.9e+107) || !(c <= 1.12e+141))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -1.9e+107) || ~((c <= 1.12e+141)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -1.9e+107], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.12e+141]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -1.8999999999999999e107 or 1.11999999999999993e141 < c

   1. Initial program 77.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 78.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 78.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 86.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 68.3%

      \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

   if -1.8999999999999999e107 < c < 1.11999999999999993e141

   1. Initial program 93.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+107} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+141}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 68.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+143}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(\left(c \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(i \cdot -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= c -3.8e+105)
   (* -2.0 (* c (* b (* c i))))
   (if (<= c 8.5e+143)
     (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)
     (* b (* (* c c) (* i -2.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -3.8e+105) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else if (c <= 8.5e+143) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = b * ((c * c) * (i * -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (c <= (-3.8d+105)) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * (b * (c * i)))
    else if (c <= 8.5d+143) then
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = b * ((c * c) * (i * (-2.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -3.8e+105) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	} else if (c <= 8.5e+143) {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = b * ((c * c) * (i * -2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if c <= -3.8e+105:
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)))
	elif c <= 8.5e+143:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = b * ((c * c) * (i * -2.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -3.8e+105)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(b * Float64(c * i))));
	elseif (c <= 8.5e+143)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(Float64(c * c) * Float64(i * -2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (c <= -3.8e+105)
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (b * (c * i)));
	elseif (c <= 8.5e+143)
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = b * ((c * c) * (i * -2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[c, -3.8e+105], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(b * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, 8.5e+143], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * N[(N[(c * c), $MachinePrecision] * N[(i * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if c < -3.8e105

   1. Initial program 81.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 84.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 84.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 89.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 89.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 89.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in i around inf 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 74.0%

      \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)}\right) \]

   if -3.8e105 < c < 8.4999999999999998e143

   1. Initial program 93.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 93.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 92.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 8.4999999999999998e143 < c

   1. Initial program 72.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 84.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(b \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 67.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot -2} \]

      2. associate-*r* 67.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(\left({c}^{2} \cdot i\right) \cdot -2\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l* 67.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{\left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(i \cdot -2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left({c}^{2} \cdot \left(i \cdot -2\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 67.8%

         \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(c \cdot c\right)} \cdot \left(i \cdot -2\right)\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 67.8%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(c \cdot c\right)} \cdot \left(i \cdot -2\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+105}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+143}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(\left(c \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(i \cdot -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 39.4% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.45 \cdot 10^{+31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.45e+31) (not (<= x 8.2e-63)))
   (* x (* y 2.0))
   (* 2.0 (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.45e+31) || !(x <= 8.2e-63)) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.45d+31)) .or. (.not. (x <= 8.2d-63))) then
        tmp = x * (y * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.45e+31) || !(x <= 8.2e-63)) {
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.45e+31) or not (x <= 8.2e-63):
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.45e+31) || !(x <= 8.2e-63))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.45e+31) || ~((x <= 8.2e-63)))
		tmp = x * (y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.45e+31], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 8.2e-63]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.4499999999999999e31 or 8.1999999999999995e-63 < x

   1. Initial program 87.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 87.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 87.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 89.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 89.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 89.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 43.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 43.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. associate-*l* 43.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 43.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} \]

   if -3.4499999999999999e31 < x < 8.1999999999999995e-63

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 89.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 89.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 91.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 91.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      5. fma-define 91.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 36.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 40.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.45 \cdot 10^{+31} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-63}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 28.9% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.4%

   \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 88.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 88.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   3. associate-*l* 90.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   4. +-commutative 90.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   5. fma-define 90.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)} \cdot i\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 90.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - c \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right) \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 25.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 25.5%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 94.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024160 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (* 2 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))