Numeric.Log:$cexpm1 from log-domain-0.10.2.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 7.2s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: N/A×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) x) y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * y) + x) + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * y) + x) + y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + x) + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * y) + x) + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) x) y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * y) + x) + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * y) + x) + y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + x) + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * y) + x) + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ y + \left(y + 1\right) \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ y (* (+ y 1.0) x)))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	return y + ((y + 1.0) * x);
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = y + ((y + 1.0d0) * x)
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return y + ((y + 1.0) * x);
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y):
	return y + ((y + 1.0) * x)

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	return Float64(y + Float64(Float64(y + 1.0) * x))
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = y + ((y + 1.0) * x);
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := N[(y + N[(N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\left(y \cdot x + x\right), y\right) \]

   2. distribute-lft1-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\left(\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\right), y\right) \]

   3. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\mathsf{*.f64}\left(\left(y + 1\right), x\right), y\right) \]

   4. +-lowering-+.f64 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\mathsf{*.f64}\left(\mathsf{+.f64}\left(y, 1\right), x\right), y\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x} + y \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto y + \left(y + 1\right) \cdot x \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -290:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-293}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -290.0) (* (+ y 1.0) x) (if (<= x -5e-293) (+ y x) (+ y (* y x)))))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -290.0) {
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x;
	} else if (x <= -5e-293) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else {
		tmp = y + (y * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-290.0d0)) then
        tmp = (y + 1.0d0) * x
    else if (x <= (-5d-293)) then
        tmp = y + x
    else
        tmp = y + (y * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -290.0) {
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x;
	} else if (x <= -5e-293) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else {
		tmp = y + (y * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -290.0:
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x
	elif x <= -5e-293:
		tmp = y + x
	else:
		tmp = y + (y * x)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -290.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y + 1.0) * x);
	elseif (x <= -5e-293)
		tmp = Float64(y + x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y + Float64(y * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -290.0)
		tmp = (y + 1.0) * x;
	elseif (x <= -5e-293)
		tmp = y + x;
	else
		tmp = y + (y * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -290.0], N[(N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -5e-293], N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -290

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \left(y + \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      3. +-lowering-+.f64 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(y, \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   if -290 < x < -5.0000000000000003e-293

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{x}, y\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + y \]

   if -5.0000000000000003e-293 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)}, y\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\left(y \cdot x\right), y\right) \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 65.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\mathsf{*.f64}\left(y, x\right), y\right) \]

   5. Simplified 65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + y \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -290:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-293}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -290:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (+ y 1.0) x)))
   (if (<= x -290.0) t_0 (if (<= x 1.0) (+ y x) t_0))))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = (y + 1.0) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -290.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (y + 1.0d0) * x
    if (x <= (-290.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = y + x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = (y + 1.0) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -290.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y):
	t_0 = (y + 1.0) * x
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -290.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= 1.0:
		tmp = y + x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(y + 1.0) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -290.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(y + x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	t_0 = (y + 1.0) * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -290.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 1.0)
		tmp = y + x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -290.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 1.0], N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -290 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \left(y + \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      3. +-lowering-+.f64 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(y, \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   if -290 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{x}, y\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -290:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 70.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-145}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.45e-145) x (if (<= x 1.0) y (* y x))))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.45e-145) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.45d-145)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = y
    else
        tmp = y * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.45e-145) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.0) {
		tmp = y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.45e-145:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.0:
		tmp = y
	else:
		tmp = y * x
	return tmp

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.45e-145)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.0)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.45e-145)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.0)
		tmp = y;
	else
		tmp = y * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.45e-145], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.0], y, N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.44999999999999992e-145

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 55.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.44999999999999992e-145 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

   if 1 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \left(y + \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      3. +-lowering-+.f64 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(y, \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{y}\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Simplified 45.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-145}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 80.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 320:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= x 320.0) (+ y x) (* y x)))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 320.0) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 320.0d0) then
        tmp = y + x
    else
        tmp = y * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 320.0) {
		tmp = y + x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 320.0:
		tmp = y + x
	else:
		tmp = y * x
	return tmp

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 320.0)
		tmp = Float64(y + x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 320.0)
		tmp = y + x;
	else
		tmp = y * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, 320.0], N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 320

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{x}, y\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + y \]

   if 320 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \left(y + \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      3. +-lowering-+.f64 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(y, \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{y}\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Simplified 45.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 320:\\ \;\;\;\;y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 63.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-78}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 3.6e-78) x y))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.6e-78) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 3.6d-78) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.6e-78) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3.6e-78:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3.6e-78)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3.6e-78)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, 3.6e-78], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.6000000000000002e-78

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 3.6000000000000002e-78 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 52.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 38.1% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 x)

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y):
	return x

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	return x
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Simplified 40.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024160 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Numeric.Log:$cexpm1 from log-domain-0.10.2.1, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) x) y))