Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.7s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 z) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 - z) * (x + y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * Float64(x + y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 74.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.85 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (- 1.0 z))))
   (if (<= z -6.2e+23) t_0 (if (<= z 2.85e-12) (+ x y) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (1.0 - z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.2e+23) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 2.85e-12) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    if (z <= (-6.2d+23)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 2.85d-12) then
        tmp = x + y
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (1.0 - z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.2e+23) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 2.85e-12) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * (1.0 - z)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -6.2e+23:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 2.85e-12:
		tmp = x + y
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -6.2e+23)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 2.85e-12)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * (1.0 - z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -6.2e+23)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 2.85e-12)
		tmp = x + y;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -6.2e+23], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 2.85e-12], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.19999999999999941e23 or 2.8500000000000002e-12 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(y, \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)}\right) \]

      2. --lowering--.f64 54.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(y, \mathsf{\_.f64}\left(1, \color{blue}{z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 54.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if -6.19999999999999941e23 < z < 2.8500000000000002e-12

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. +-lowering-+.f64 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.85 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 62.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-77}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -8.2e-77) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* y (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.2e-77) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-8.2d-77)) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.2e-77) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -8.2e-77:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -8.2e-77)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -8.2e-77)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -8.2e-77], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -8.19999999999999925e-77

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(\left(1 - z\right), \color{blue}{x}\right) \]

      3. --lowering--.f64 72.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(\mathsf{\_.f64}\left(1, z\right), x\right) \]

   5. Simplified 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -8.19999999999999925e-77 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(y, \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)}\right) \]

      2. --lowering--.f64 62.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(y, \mathsf{\_.f64}\left(1, \color{blue}{z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-77}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 32.1% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.02e-50) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.02e-50) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.02d-50)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.02e-50) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.02e-50:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.02e-50)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.02e-50)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.02e-50], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.0199999999999999e-50

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(\left(1 - z\right), \color{blue}{x}\right) \]

      3. --lowering--.f64 76.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(\mathsf{\_.f64}\left(1, z\right), x\right) \]

   5. Simplified 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Simplified 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.0199999999999999e-50 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(y, \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)}\right) \]

      2. --lowering--.f64 62.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(y, \mathsf{\_.f64}\left(1, \color{blue}{z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 62.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Simplified 29.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 51.0% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{x} \]

   2. +-lowering-+.f64 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}\right) \]

5. Simplified 49.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

6. Final simplification 49.7%

   \[\leadsto x + y \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 26.0% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   2. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(\left(1 - z\right), \color{blue}{x}\right) \]

   3. --lowering--.f64 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(\mathsf{\_.f64}\left(1, z\right), x\right) \]

5. Simplified 51.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Simplified 25.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024158 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))