Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.2s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* x y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (x * y)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(x * y)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 59.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-222}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-241}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-103}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5.8e+55)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= y -1.55e-46)
     z
     (if (<= y -1.25e-222)
       (* x 0.5)
       (if (<= y 1.65e-241)
         z
         (if (<= y 6.8e-103) (* x 0.5) (if (<= y 2.5e+81) z (* x y))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.8e+55) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= -1.55e-46) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= -1.25e-222) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 1.65e-241) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 6.8e-103) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 2.5e+81) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5.8d+55)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (y <= (-1.55d-46)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= (-1.25d-222)) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else if (y <= 1.65d-241) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 6.8d-103) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else if (y <= 2.5d+81) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.8e+55) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= -1.55e-46) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= -1.25e-222) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 1.65e-241) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 6.8e-103) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else if (y <= 2.5e+81) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5.8e+55:
		tmp = x * y
	elif y <= -1.55e-46:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= -1.25e-222:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	elif y <= 1.65e-241:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 6.8e-103:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	elif y <= 2.5e+81:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5.8e+55)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (y <= -1.55e-46)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= -1.25e-222)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	elseif (y <= 1.65e-241)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 6.8e-103)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	elseif (y <= 2.5e+81)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5.8e+55)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (y <= -1.55e-46)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= -1.25e-222)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	elseif (y <= 1.65e-241)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 6.8e-103)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	elseif (y <= 2.5e+81)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5.8e+55], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -1.55e-46], z, If[LessEqual[y, -1.25e-222], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.65e-241], z, If[LessEqual[y, 6.8e-103], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.5e+81], z, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -5.7999999999999997e55 or 2.4999999999999999e81 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 73.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{y}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -5.7999999999999997e55 < y < -1.55e-46 or -1.25000000000000002e-222 < y < 1.6499999999999999e-241 or 6.80000000000000006e-103 < y < 2.4999999999999999e81

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -1.55e-46 < y < -1.25000000000000002e-222 or 1.6499999999999999e-241 < y < 6.80000000000000006e-103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-lowering-+.f64 68.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\frac{1}{2}, \color{blue}{y}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 68.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 68.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 68.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -48:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ z (* x y))))
   (if (<= y -48.0) t_0 (if (<= y 0.5) (+ z (* x 0.5)) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -48.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.5) {
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = z + (x * y)
    if (y <= (-48.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 0.5d0) then
        tmp = z + (x * 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -48.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.5) {
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = z + (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -48.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 0.5:
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(z + Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -48.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.5)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = z + (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -48.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.5)
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -48.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 0.5], N[(z + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -48 or 0.5 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)}, z\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, y\right), z\right) \]

   5. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   if -48 < y < 0.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot x\right)}, z\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\left(x \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right), z\right) \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \frac{1}{2}\right), z\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} + z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -48:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -215:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -215.0)
   (* x (+ y 0.5))
   (if (<= y 1.25e+81) (+ z (* x 0.5)) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -215.0) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else if (y <= 1.25e+81) {
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-215.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    else if (y <= 1.25d+81) then
        tmp = z + (x * 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -215.0) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else if (y <= 1.25e+81) {
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -215.0:
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	elif y <= 1.25e+81:
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -215.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	elseif (y <= 1.25e+81)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -215.0)
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	elseif (y <= 1.25e+81)
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -215.0], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.25e+81], N[(z + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -215

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-lowering-+.f64 61.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\frac{1}{2}, \color{blue}{y}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 61.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   if -215 < y < 1.25e81

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot x\right)}, z\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\left(x \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right), z\right) \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \frac{1}{2}\right), z\right) \]

   5. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} + z \]

   if 1.25e81 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 83.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{y}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -215:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 73.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 900000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.4e+70) z (if (<= z 900000.0) (* x (+ y 0.5)) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.4e+70) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 900000.0) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.4d+70)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 900000.0d0) then
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.4e+70) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 900000.0) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.4e+70:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 900000.0:
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.4e+70)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 900000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.4e+70)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 900000.0)
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.4e+70], z, If[LessEqual[z, 900000.0], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], z]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.39999999999999987e70 or 9e5 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -2.39999999999999987e70 < z < 9e5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-lowering-+.f64 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\frac{1}{2}, \color{blue}{y}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 900000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 50.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{-118}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 35000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.4e-118) z (if (<= z 35000.0) (* x 0.5) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.4e-118) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 35000.0) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.4d-118)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 35000.0d0) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.4e-118) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 35000.0) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.4e-118:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 35000.0:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.4e-118)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 35000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.4e-118)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 35000.0)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.4e-118], z, If[LessEqual[z, 35000.0], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], z]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.39999999999999991e-118 or 35000 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -3.39999999999999991e-118 < z < 35000

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-lowering-+.f64 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\frac{1}{2}, \color{blue}{y}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 48.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 48.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 40.6% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Simplified 41.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024158 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))