SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.5% → 97.0%

Time: 13.4s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y\_m \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(t\_1 - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y_m))))
   (if (<= y_m 7.2e+124)
     (+ x (* (* y_m z) (- t_1 (tanh (/ x y_m)))))
     (+ x (* z (- (* y_m t_1) x))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 7.2e+124) {
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - tanh((x / y_m))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y_m))
    if (y_m <= 7.2d+124) then
        tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - tanh((x / y_m))))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 7.2e+124) {
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - Math.tanh((x / y_m))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y_m))
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 7.2e+124:
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - math.tanh((x / y_m))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y_m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 7.2e+124)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y_m * z) * Float64(t_1 - tanh(Float64(x / y_m)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y_m * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 7.2e+124)
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - tanh((x / y_m))));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 7.2e+124], N[(x + N[(N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t$95$1 - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y$95$m * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 7.19999999999999972e124

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 7.19999999999999972e124 < y

   1. Initial program 80.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 55.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 55.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 55.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 55.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) - x \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 76.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - z \cdot x\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 55.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right) - x\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 87.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y\_m \cdot z\right) \cdot t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y_m))))
   (if (<= y_m 2.3e+65)
     (+ x (* (* y_m z) t_1))
     (+ x (* z (- (* y_m t_1) x))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.3e+65) {
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y_m))
    if (y_m <= 2.3d+65) then
        tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * t_1)
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.3e+65) {
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y_m))
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 2.3e+65:
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * t_1)
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y_m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 2.3e+65)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y_m * z) * t_1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y_m * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 2.3e+65)
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * t_1);
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 2.3e+65], N[(x + N[(N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y$95$m * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.3e65

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 24.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 86.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 86.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 2.3e65 < y

   1. Initial program 87.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 59.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 59.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 59.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) - x \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 77.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - z \cdot x\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 59.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right) - x\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y\_m \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1.2e+66) (+ x (* (* y_m z) (tanh (/ t y_m)))) (fma z (- t x) x)))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.2e+66) {
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * tanh((t / y_m)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, (t - x), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.2e+66)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y_m * z) * tanh(Float64(t / y_m))));
	else
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(t - x), x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.2e+66], N[(x + N[(N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.2000000000000001e66

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 24.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 24.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 86.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 86.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 1.2000000000000001e66 < y

   1. Initial program 87.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 0.58:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y_m 0.58) x (fma z (- t x) x)))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 0.58) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, (t - x), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 0.58)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(t - x), x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 0.58], x, N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 0.57999999999999996

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 0.57999999999999996 < y

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 84.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 78.0% accurate, 17.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 0.68:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 0.68) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 0.68) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 0.68d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 0.68) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 0.68:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 0.68)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 0.68)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 0.68], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 0.680000000000000049

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 0.680000000000000049 < y

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 70.9% accurate, 21.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 11500000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 11500000000000.0) x (+ x (* z t))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 11500000000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 11500000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 11500000000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 11500000000000.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 11500000000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 11500000000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 11500000000000.0], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.15e13

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 63.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.15e13 < y

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 35.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 34.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 34.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 34.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 34.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 34.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 72.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \]

   8. Simplified 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 11500000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 67.5% accurate, 21.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 165:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y_m 165.0) x (* x (- 1.0 z))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 165.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 165.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 165.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 165.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 165.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 165.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 165.0], x, N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 165

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 165 < y

   1. Initial program 89.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right), x\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 61.7%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 61.7%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 61.7%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot x} \]

      5. mul-1-neg 61.7%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      6. distribute-rgt-in 61.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]

      7. mul-1-neg 61.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      8. unsub-neg 61.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 61.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 60.9% accurate, 23.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 1.3e+225) x (* x (- z))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.3e+225) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 1.3d+225) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.3e+225) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 1.3e+225:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * -z
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.3e+225)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 1.3e+225)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.3e+225], x, N[(x * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.30000000000000002e225

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.30000000000000002e225 < z

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right), x\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 34.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 34.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot x} + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 34.5%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 34.5%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 34.5%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot x} \]

      5. mul-1-neg 34.5%

         \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      6. distribute-rgt-in 34.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]

      7. mul-1-neg 34.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      8. unsub-neg 34.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 34.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around inf 34.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. neg-mul-1 34.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot z} \]

       2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 34.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 34.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 60.8% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	return x

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.4%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-define 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 57.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 96.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024157 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))