Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 90.4% → 95.7%

Time: 10.7s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• 50.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 95.7% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot 4 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-293}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 4, t - z \cdot z, x \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot 4 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-37}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right) + 4 \cdot {\left(z \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)}^{2}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* y 4.0) 2e-293)
   (fma (* y 4.0) (- t (* z z)) (* x x))
   (if (<= (* y 4.0) 5e-37)
     (- (* x x) (+ (* -4.0 (* y t)) (* 4.0 (pow (* z (sqrt y)) 2.0))))
     (fma x x (* (- (* z z) t) (* y -4.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * 4.0) <= 2e-293) {
		tmp = fma((y * 4.0), (t - (z * z)), (x * x));
	} else if ((y * 4.0) <= 5e-37) {
		tmp = (x * x) - ((-4.0 * (y * t)) + (4.0 * pow((z * sqrt(y)), 2.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(x, x, (((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * 4.0) <= 2e-293)
		tmp = fma(Float64(y * 4.0), Float64(t - Float64(z * z)), Float64(x * x));
	elseif (Float64(y * 4.0) <= 5e-37)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(-4.0 * Float64(y * t)) + Float64(4.0 * (Float64(z * sqrt(y)) ^ 2.0))));
	else
		tmp = fma(x, x, Float64(Float64(Float64(z * z) - t) * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision], 2e-293], N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision], 5e-37], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(-4.0 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(4.0 * N[Power[N[(z * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * x + N[(N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y #s(literal 4 binary64)) < 2.0000000000000001e-293

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x + \left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 95.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) \cdot 4\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) + x \cdot x} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) + x \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} + x \cdot x \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(-\left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} + x \cdot x \]

      7. fma-define 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 4, -\left(z \cdot z - t\right), x \cdot x\right)} \]

      8. sub-neg 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 4, -\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z + \left(-t\right)\right)}, x \cdot x\right) \]

      9. +-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 4, -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-t\right) + z \cdot z\right)}, x \cdot x\right) \]

      10. distribute-neg-in 95.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 4, \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-t\right)\right) + \left(-z \cdot z\right)}, x \cdot x\right) \]

      11. remove-double-neg 95.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 4, \color{blue}{t} + \left(-z \cdot z\right), x \cdot x\right) \]

      12. sub-neg 95.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 4, \color{blue}{t - z \cdot z}, x \cdot x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 4, t - z \cdot z, x \cdot x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 2.0000000000000001e-293 < (*.f64 y #s(literal 4 binary64)) < 4.9999999999999997e-37

   1. Initial program 85.4%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow2 85.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. add-sqr-sqrt 85.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right)}\right) \]

      3. pow2 85.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + 4 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{y \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 85.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + 4 \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot y}}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

      5. sqrt-prod 85.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + 4 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z \cdot z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)}}^{2}\right) \]

      6. sqrt-prod 59.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + 4 \cdot {\left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

      7. add-sqr-sqrt 98.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + 4 \cdot {\left(\color{blue}{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)}^{2}\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + 4 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(z \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

   if 4.9999999999999997e-37 < (*.f64 y #s(literal 4 binary64))

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fmm-def 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot 4 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-293}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 4, t - z \cdot z, x \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot 4 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-37}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - \left(-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right) + 4 \cdot {\left(z \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)}^{2}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 92.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma x x (* (- (* z z) t) (* y -4.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(x, x, (((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(x, x, Float64(Float64(Float64(z * z) - t) * Float64(y * -4.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * x + N[(N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.5%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fmm-def 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-neg-in 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)}\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. metadata-eval 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 93.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 73.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 2.8e+95) (- (* x x) (* y (* t -4.0))) (* (* z z) (* y -4.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.8e+95) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (y * (t * -4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (z * z) * (y * -4.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 2.8d+95) then
        tmp = (x * x) - (y * (t * (-4.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = (z * z) * (y * (-4.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.8e+95) {
		tmp = (x * x) - (y * (t * -4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (z * z) * (y * -4.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 2.8e+95:
		tmp = (x * x) - (y * (t * -4.0))
	else:
		tmp = (z * z) * (y * -4.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 2.8e+95)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(y * Float64(t * -4.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * z) * Float64(y * -4.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 2.8e+95)
		tmp = (x * x) - (y * (t * -4.0));
	else
		tmp = (z * z) * (y * -4.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 2.8e+95], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(t * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 2.7999999999999998e95

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 72.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 72.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot -4} \]

      2. *-commutative 72.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      3. associate-*l* 72.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 72.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]

   if 2.7999999999999998e95 < z

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fmm-def 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 80.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot y\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. *-commutative 80.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 80.4%

         \[\leadsto {z}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 80.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 90.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- t (* z z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0d0) * (t - (z * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(t - Float64(z * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.5%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 92.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 43.8% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 3.4e-19) (* 4.0 (* y t)) (* (* z z) (* y -4.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3.4e-19) {
		tmp = 4.0 * (y * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * z) * (y * -4.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 3.4d-19) then
        tmp = 4.0d0 * (y * t)
    else
        tmp = (z * z) * (y * (-4.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3.4e-19) {
		tmp = 4.0 * (y * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (z * z) * (y * -4.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 3.4e-19:
		tmp = 4.0 * (y * t)
	else:
		tmp = (z * z) * (y * -4.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 3.4e-19)
		tmp = Float64(4.0 * Float64(y * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * z) * Float64(y * -4.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 3.4e-19)
		tmp = 4.0 * (y * t);
	else
		tmp = (z * z) * (y * -4.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 3.4e-19], N[(4.0 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 3.4000000000000002e-19

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fmm-def 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 34.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 34.6%

         \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 34.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

   if 3.4000000000000002e-19 < z

   1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fmm-def 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot y\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. *-commutative 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 64.4%

         \[\leadsto {z}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 31.3% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* 4.0 (* y t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 4.0 * (y * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 4.0d0 * (y * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 4.0 * (y * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return 4.0 * (y * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(4.0 * Float64(y * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 4.0 * (y * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(4.0 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.5%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fmm-def 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-neg-in 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)}\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. metadata-eval 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 93.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 26.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 26.8%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

7. Simplified 26.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 90.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* y (- (* z z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - (4.0d0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(y * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024157 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (* x x) (* 4 (* y (- (* z z) t)))))

  (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))