Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.8s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (x + z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (x + z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (x + z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.0) (not (<= y 1.2e-9))) (* y (+ x z)) (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.2e-9)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.2d-9))) then
        tmp = y * (x + z)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.2e-9)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.0) or not (y <= 1.2e-9):
		tmp = y * (x + z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.2e-9))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || ~((y <= 1.2e-9)))
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.2e-9]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 1.2e-9 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right) + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

   if -1 < y < 1.2e-9

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3000000.0) (not (<= y 4.2e-19))) (* y (+ x z)) (+ x (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3000000.0) || !(y <= 4.2e-19)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4.2d-19))) then
        tmp = y * (x + z)
    else
        tmp = x + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3000000.0) || !(y <= 4.2e-19)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3000000.0) or not (y <= 4.2e-19):
		tmp = y * (x + z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3000000.0) || !(y <= 4.2e-19))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3000000.0) || ~((y <= 4.2e-19)))
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	else
		tmp = x + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4.2e-19]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3e6 or 4.1999999999999998e-19 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right) + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

   if -3e6 < y < 4.1999999999999998e-19

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 71.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{-14} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -6.6e-14) (not (<= y 1.5e-19))) (* y (+ x z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6.6e-14) || !(y <= 1.5e-19)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-6.6d-14)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.5d-19))) then
        tmp = y * (x + z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6.6e-14) || !(y <= 1.5e-19)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -6.6e-14) or not (y <= 1.5e-19):
		tmp = y * (x + z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -6.6e-14) || !(y <= 1.5e-19))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -6.6e-14) || ~((y <= 1.5e-19)))
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -6.6e-14], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.5e-19]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.5999999999999996e-14 or 1.49999999999999996e-19 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right) + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

   if -6.5999999999999996e-14 < y < 1.49999999999999996e-19

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 71.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{-14} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 62.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-14} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8.5e-14) (not (<= y 2.6e-14))) (* y z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.5e-14) || !(y <= 2.6e-14)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-8.5d-14)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.6d-14))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8.5e-14) || !(y <= 2.6e-14)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -8.5e-14) or not (y <= 2.6e-14):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8.5e-14) || !(y <= 2.6e-14))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -8.5e-14) || ~((y <= 2.6e-14)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8.5e-14], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.6e-14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.50000000000000038e-14 or 2.59999999999999997e-14 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 60.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -8.50000000000000038e-14 < y < 2.59999999999999997e-14

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 71.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-14} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 60.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.0) (not (<= y 1.2e-9))) (* x y) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.2e-9)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.2d-9))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.2e-9)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.0) or not (y <= 1.2e-9):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.2e-9))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || ~((y <= 1.2e-9)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.2e-9]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 1.2e-9 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right) + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   7. Simplified 45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < y < 1.2e-9

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 71.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 37.2% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 56.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 56.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

5. Simplified 56.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 32.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024157 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))