Numeric.SpecFunctions:choose from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 85.1% → 96.6%

Time: 7.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ (* x (+ y z)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) / z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) / z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) / z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) / z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) / z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) / z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 85.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ (* x (+ y z)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) / z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) / z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) / z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) / z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) / z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) / z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x\_m = \left|x\right| \\ x\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, x\right) \\ x\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x\_m \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x\_m \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x\_m, \frac{y}{z}, x\_m\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x\_m = (fabs.f64 x)
x\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) x)
(FPCore (x_s x_m y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* x_s (if (<= x_m 1.4e-28) (/ (* x_m (+ y z)) z) (fma x_m (/ y z) x_m))))

C

x\_m = fabs(x);
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x);
double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x_m <= 1.4e-28) {
		tmp = (x_m * (y + z)) / z;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(x_m, (y / z), x_m);
	}
	return x_s * tmp;
}

Julia

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x)
function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x_m <= 1.4e-28)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x_m * Float64(y + z)) / z);
	else
		tmp = fma(x_m, Float64(y / z), x_m);
	end
	return Float64(x_s * tmp)
end

Wolfram

x\_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
x\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[x]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$s_, x$95$m_, y_, z_] := N[(x$95$s * If[LessEqual[x$95$m, 1.4e-28], N[(N[(x$95$m * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x$95$m * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] + x$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 1.3999999999999999e-28

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.3999999999999999e-28 < x

   1. Initial program 79.4%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{z} \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{z} \cdot y + \frac{x}{z} \cdot z} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 80.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot y}{z}} + \frac{x}{z} \cdot z \]

      4. associate-*r/ 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{z}} + \frac{x}{z} \cdot z \]

      5. fma-undefine 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, \frac{x}{z} \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. remove-double-neg 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, \frac{x}{z} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-out 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, \color{blue}{-\frac{x}{z} \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      8. distribute-lft-neg-out 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{z}\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      9. distribute-frac-neg2 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, \color{blue}{\frac{x}{-z}} \cdot \left(-z\right)\right) \]

      10. associate-*l/ 79.3%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(-z\right)}{-z}}\right) \]

      11. associate-/l* 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{-z}{-z}}\right) \]

      12. *-inverses 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, x \cdot \color{blue}{1}\right) \]

      13. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, \color{blue}{x}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 72.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x\_m = \left|x\right| \\ x\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, x\right) \\ x\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+41}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\_m\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-107}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x\_m \cdot y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x\_m = (fabs.f64 x)
x\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) x)
(FPCore (x_s x_m y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* x_s (if (<= z -1.7e+41) x_m (if (<= z 2.8e-107) (/ (* x_m y) z) x_m))))

C

x\_m = fabs(x);
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x);
double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.7e+41) {
		tmp = x_m;
	} else if (z <= 2.8e-107) {
		tmp = (x_m * y) / z;
	} else {
		tmp = x_m;
	}
	return x_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0d0, x)
real(8) function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.7d+41)) then
        tmp = x_m
    else if (z <= 2.8d-107) then
        tmp = (x_m * y) / z
    else
        tmp = x_m
    end if
    code = x_s * tmp
end function

Java

x\_m = Math.abs(x);
x\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, x);
public static double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.7e+41) {
		tmp = x_m;
	} else if (z <= 2.8e-107) {
		tmp = (x_m * y) / z;
	} else {
		tmp = x_m;
	}
	return x_s * tmp;
}

Python

x\_m = math.fabs(x)
x\_s = math.copysign(1.0, x)
def code(x_s, x_m, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.7e+41:
		tmp = x_m
	elif z <= 2.8e-107:
		tmp = (x_m * y) / z
	else:
		tmp = x_m
	return x_s * tmp

Julia

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x)
function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.7e+41)
		tmp = x_m;
	elseif (z <= 2.8e-107)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x_m * y) / z);
	else
		tmp = x_m;
	end
	return Float64(x_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

x\_m = abs(x);
x\_s = sign(x) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.7e+41)
		tmp = x_m;
	elseif (z <= 2.8e-107)
		tmp = (x_m * y) / z;
	else
		tmp = x_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = x_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

x\_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
x\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[x]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$s_, x$95$m_, y_, z_] := N[(x$95$s * If[LessEqual[z, -1.7e+41], x$95$m, If[LessEqual[z, 2.8e-107], N[(N[(x$95$m * y), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision], x$95$m]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.69999999999999999e41 or 2.7999999999999999e-107 < z

   1. Initial program 80.3%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y + z}{z}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{y + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right)}}{z} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y - \left(-z\right)}}{z} \]

      4. div-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{z}\right)} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{\color{blue}{-\left(-z\right)}}\right) \]

      6. distribute-frac-neg2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-z}{-z}\right)}\right) \]

      7. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.69999999999999999e41 < z < 2.7999999999999999e-107

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y}}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}}{z} \]

   5. Simplified 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+41}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-107}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 71.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x\_m = \left|x\right| \\ x\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, x\right) \\ x\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\_m\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-106}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{x\_m}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x\_m = (fabs.f64 x)
x\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) x)
(FPCore (x_s x_m y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* x_s (if (<= z -1.8e+40) x_m (if (<= z 1.7e-106) (* y (/ x_m z)) x_m))))

C

x\_m = fabs(x);
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x);
double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e+40) {
		tmp = x_m;
	} else if (z <= 1.7e-106) {
		tmp = y * (x_m / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x_m;
	}
	return x_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0d0, x)
real(8) function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.8d+40)) then
        tmp = x_m
    else if (z <= 1.7d-106) then
        tmp = y * (x_m / z)
    else
        tmp = x_m
    end if
    code = x_s * tmp
end function

Java

x\_m = Math.abs(x);
x\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, x);
public static double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.8e+40) {
		tmp = x_m;
	} else if (z <= 1.7e-106) {
		tmp = y * (x_m / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x_m;
	}
	return x_s * tmp;
}

Python

x\_m = math.fabs(x)
x\_s = math.copysign(1.0, x)
def code(x_s, x_m, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.8e+40:
		tmp = x_m
	elif z <= 1.7e-106:
		tmp = y * (x_m / z)
	else:
		tmp = x_m
	return x_s * tmp

Julia

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x)
function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.8e+40)
		tmp = x_m;
	elseif (z <= 1.7e-106)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x_m / z));
	else
		tmp = x_m;
	end
	return Float64(x_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

x\_m = abs(x);
x\_s = sign(x) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.8e+40)
		tmp = x_m;
	elseif (z <= 1.7e-106)
		tmp = y * (x_m / z);
	else
		tmp = x_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = x_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

x\_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
x\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[x]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$s_, x$95$m_, y_, z_] := N[(x$95$s * If[LessEqual[z, -1.8e+40], x$95$m, If[LessEqual[z, 1.7e-106], N[(y * N[(x$95$m / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x$95$m]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.79999999999999998e40 or 1.69999999999999991e-106 < z

   1. Initial program 80.3%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y + z}{z}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{y + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right)}}{z} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y - \left(-z\right)}}{z} \]

      4. div-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{z}\right)} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{\color{blue}{-\left(-z\right)}}\right) \]

      6. distribute-frac-neg2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-z}{-z}\right)}\right) \]

      7. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.79999999999999998e40 < z < 1.69999999999999991e-106

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 88.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y + z}{z}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{y + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right)}}{z} \]

      3. unsub-neg 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y - \left(-z\right)}}{z} \]

      4. div-sub 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{z}\right)} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{\color{blue}{-\left(-z\right)}}\right) \]

      6. distribute-frac-neg2 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-z}{-z}\right)}\right) \]

      7. *-inverses 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot y}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 74.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{z} \cdot y} \]

      2. *-commutative 74.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{x}{z}} \]

   7. Simplified 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{x}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 70.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x\_m = \left|x\right| \\ x\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, x\right) \\ x\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\_m\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-106}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\_m \cdot \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x\_m = (fabs.f64 x)
x\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) x)
(FPCore (x_s x_m y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* x_s (if (<= z -1.05e+48) x_m (if (<= z 1.75e-106) (* x_m (/ y z)) x_m))))

C

x\_m = fabs(x);
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x);
double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e+48) {
		tmp = x_m;
	} else if (z <= 1.75e-106) {
		tmp = x_m * (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x_m;
	}
	return x_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0d0, x)
real(8) function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.05d+48)) then
        tmp = x_m
    else if (z <= 1.75d-106) then
        tmp = x_m * (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x_m
    end if
    code = x_s * tmp
end function

Java

x\_m = Math.abs(x);
x\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, x);
public static double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e+48) {
		tmp = x_m;
	} else if (z <= 1.75e-106) {
		tmp = x_m * (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x_m;
	}
	return x_s * tmp;
}

Python

x\_m = math.fabs(x)
x\_s = math.copysign(1.0, x)
def code(x_s, x_m, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.05e+48:
		tmp = x_m
	elif z <= 1.75e-106:
		tmp = x_m * (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x_m
	return x_s * tmp

Julia

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x)
function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.05e+48)
		tmp = x_m;
	elseif (z <= 1.75e-106)
		tmp = Float64(x_m * Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = x_m;
	end
	return Float64(x_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

x\_m = abs(x);
x\_s = sign(x) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.05e+48)
		tmp = x_m;
	elseif (z <= 1.75e-106)
		tmp = x_m * (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = x_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

x\_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
x\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[x]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$s_, x$95$m_, y_, z_] := N[(x$95$s * If[LessEqual[z, -1.05e+48], x$95$m, If[LessEqual[z, 1.75e-106], N[(x$95$m * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x$95$m]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.0499999999999999e48 or 1.75e-106 < z

   1. Initial program 80.3%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y + z}{z}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{y + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right)}}{z} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y - \left(-z\right)}}{z} \]

      4. div-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{z}\right)} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{\color{blue}{-\left(-z\right)}}\right) \]

      6. distribute-frac-neg2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-z}{-z}\right)}\right) \]

      7. *-inverses 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.0499999999999999e48 < z < 1.75e-106

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 88.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y + z}{z}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{y + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right)}}{z} \]

      3. unsub-neg 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y - \left(-z\right)}}{z} \]

      4. div-sub 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{z}\right)} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{\color{blue}{-\left(-z\right)}}\right) \]

      6. distribute-frac-neg2 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-z}{-z}\right)}\right) \]

      7. *-inverses 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 70.2%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 96.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x\_m = \left|x\right| \\ x\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, x\right) \\ x\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x\_m \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x\_m \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\_m \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x\_m = (fabs.f64 x)
x\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) x)
(FPCore (x_s x_m y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* x_s (if (<= x_m 1.75e-28) (/ (* x_m (+ y z)) z) (* x_m (- (/ y z) -1.0)))))

C

x\_m = fabs(x);
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x);
double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x_m <= 1.75e-28) {
		tmp = (x_m * (y + z)) / z;
	} else {
		tmp = x_m * ((y / z) - -1.0);
	}
	return x_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0d0, x)
real(8) function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x_m <= 1.75d-28) then
        tmp = (x_m * (y + z)) / z
    else
        tmp = x_m * ((y / z) - (-1.0d0))
    end if
    code = x_s * tmp
end function

Java

x\_m = Math.abs(x);
x\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, x);
public static double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x_m <= 1.75e-28) {
		tmp = (x_m * (y + z)) / z;
	} else {
		tmp = x_m * ((y / z) - -1.0);
	}
	return x_s * tmp;
}

Python

x\_m = math.fabs(x)
x\_s = math.copysign(1.0, x)
def code(x_s, x_m, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x_m <= 1.75e-28:
		tmp = (x_m * (y + z)) / z
	else:
		tmp = x_m * ((y / z) - -1.0)
	return x_s * tmp

Julia

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x)
function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x_m <= 1.75e-28)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x_m * Float64(y + z)) / z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x_m * Float64(Float64(y / z) - -1.0));
	end
	return Float64(x_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

x\_m = abs(x);
x\_s = sign(x) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x_m <= 1.75e-28)
		tmp = (x_m * (y + z)) / z;
	else
		tmp = x_m * ((y / z) - -1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = x_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

x\_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
x\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[x]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$s_, x$95$m_, y_, z_] := N[(x$95$s * If[LessEqual[x$95$m, 1.75e-28], N[(N[(x$95$m * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x$95$m * N[(N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 1.75e-28

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.75e-28 < x

   1. Initial program 79.4%

      \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y + z}{z}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{y + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right)}}{z} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y - \left(-z\right)}}{z} \]

      4. div-sub 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{z}\right)} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{\color{blue}{-\left(-z\right)}}\right) \]

      6. distribute-frac-neg2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-z}{-z}\right)}\right) \]

      7. *-inverses 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 95.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x\_m = \left|x\right| \\ x\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, x\right) \\ x\_s \cdot \left(x\_m \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

x\_m = (fabs.f64 x)
x\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) x)
(FPCore (x_s x_m y z) :precision binary64 (* x_s (* x_m (- (/ y z) -1.0))))

C

x\_m = fabs(x);
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x);
double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	return x_s * (x_m * ((y / z) - -1.0));
}

Fortran

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0d0, x)
real(8) function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x_s * (x_m * ((y / z) - (-1.0d0)))
end function

Java

x\_m = Math.abs(x);
x\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, x);
public static double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	return x_s * (x_m * ((y / z) - -1.0));
}

Python

x\_m = math.fabs(x)
x\_s = math.copysign(1.0, x)
def code(x_s, x_m, y, z):
	return x_s * (x_m * ((y / z) - -1.0))

Julia

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x)
function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	return Float64(x_s * Float64(x_m * Float64(Float64(y / z) - -1.0)))
end

MATLAB

x\_m = abs(x);
x\_s = sign(x) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = x_s * (x_m * ((y / z) - -1.0));
end

Wolfram

x\_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
x\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[x]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$s_, x$95$m_, y_, z_] := N[(x$95$s * N[(x$95$m * N[(N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.8%

   \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y + z}{z}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{y + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right)}}{z} \]

   3. unsub-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y - \left(-z\right)}}{z} \]

   4. div-sub 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{z}\right)} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{\color{blue}{-\left(-z\right)}}\right) \]

   6. distribute-frac-neg2 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-z}{-z}\right)}\right) \]

   7. *-inverses 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 94.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 50.1% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x\_m = \left|x\right| \\ x\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, x\right) \\ x\_s \cdot x\_m \end{array} \]

FPCore

x\_m = (fabs.f64 x)
x\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) x)
(FPCore (x_s x_m y z) :precision binary64 (* x_s x_m))

C

x\_m = fabs(x);
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x);
double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	return x_s * x_m;
}

Fortran

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0d0, x)
real(8) function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x_s * x_m
end function

Java

x\_m = Math.abs(x);
x\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, x);
public static double code(double x_s, double x_m, double y, double z) {
	return x_s * x_m;
}

Python

x\_m = math.fabs(x)
x\_s = math.copysign(1.0, x)
def code(x_s, x_m, y, z):
	return x_s * x_m

Julia

x\_m = abs(x)
x\_s = copysign(1.0, x)
function code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	return Float64(x_s * x_m)
end

MATLAB

x\_m = abs(x);
x\_s = sign(x) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(x_s, x_m, y, z)
	tmp = x_s * x_m;
end

Wolfram

x\_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
x\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[x]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$s_, x$95$m_, y_, z_] := N[(x$95$s * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.8%

   \[\frac{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y + z}{z}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{y + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right)}}{z} \]

   3. unsub-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y - \left(-z\right)}}{z} \]

   4. div-sub 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{z}\right)} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \frac{-z}{\color{blue}{-\left(-z\right)}}\right) \]

   6. distribute-frac-neg2 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-z}{-z}\right)}\right) \]

   7. *-inverses 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval 94.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 94.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y}{z} - -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 48.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 96.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{\frac{z}{y + z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ x (/ z (+ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x / (z / (y + z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x / (z / (y + z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x / (z / (y + z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x / (z / (y + z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x / Float64(z / Float64(y + z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x / (z / (y + z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x / N[(z / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024157 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:choose from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (/ x (/ z (+ y z))))

  (/ (* x (+ y z)) z))