Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A

Percentage Accurate: 89.9% → 98.8%

Time: 12.4s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

• Rival profile vector overflowed, profile may not be complete

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -1.9999999999999999e-154
  2. k = 0.0
  3. m = -2.00000000000000007e154

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 89.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot {\left(\frac{\sqrt{a\_m \cdot {k}^{m}}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\right)}^{2} \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (* a_s (pow (/ (sqrt (* a_m (pow k m))) (hypot 1.0 k)) 2.0)))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	return a_s * pow((sqrt((a_m * pow(k, m))) / hypot(1.0, k)), 2.0);
}

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	return a_s * Math.pow((Math.sqrt((a_m * Math.pow(k, m))) / Math.hypot(1.0, k)), 2.0);
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	return a_s * math.pow((math.sqrt((a_m * math.pow(k, m))) / math.hypot(1.0, k)), 2.0)

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	return Float64(a_s * (Float64(sqrt(Float64(a_m * (k ^ m))) / hypot(1.0, k)) ^ 2.0))
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = a_s * ((sqrt((a_m * (k ^ m))) / hypot(1.0, k)) ^ 2.0);
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * N[Power[N[(N[Sqrt[N[(a$95$m * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.7%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 90.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in k around inf 89.4%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}} \cdot \sqrt{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

   2. pow2 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}}\right)}^{2}} \]

   3. associate-*r/ 68.5%

      \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}}}\right)}^{2} \]

   4. sqrt-div 64.6%

      \[\leadsto {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{\sqrt{a \cdot {k}^{m}}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}\right)}}^{2} \]

   5. hypot-1-def 67.6%

      \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\sqrt{a \cdot {k}^{m}}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}\right)}^{2} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\sqrt{a \cdot {k}^{m}}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.0% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot \left(a\_m \cdot \frac{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (* a_s (* a_m (/ (/ (pow k m) (hypot 1.0 k)) (hypot 1.0 k)))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	return a_s * (a_m * ((pow(k, m) / hypot(1.0, k)) / hypot(1.0, k)));
}

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	return a_s * (a_m * ((Math.pow(k, m) / Math.hypot(1.0, k)) / Math.hypot(1.0, k)));
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	return a_s * (a_m * ((math.pow(k, m) / math.hypot(1.0, k)) / math.hypot(1.0, k)))

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	return Float64(a_s * Float64(a_m * Float64(Float64((k ^ m) / hypot(1.0, k)) / hypot(1.0, k))))
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = a_s * (a_m * (((k ^ m) / hypot(1.0, k)) / hypot(1.0, k)));
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * N[(a$95$m * N[(N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.7%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 90.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in k around inf 89.4%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-un-lft-identity 89.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot {k}^{m}}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

   2. add-sqr-sqrt 89.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{1 \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k} \cdot \sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

   3. times-frac 89.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}\right)} \]

   4. hypot-1-def 89.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}\right) \]

   5. hypot-1-def 97.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}\right) \]

7. Applied egg-rr 97.0%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\right)} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 97.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   2. *-lft-identity 97.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \]

9. Simplified 97.1%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a\_m \cdot {k}^{m}\\ a\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a_m (pow k m))))
   (* a_s (if (<= m 3.3) (/ t_0 (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))) t_0))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a_m * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a_m * (k ** m)
    if (m <= 3.3d0) then
        tmp = t_0 / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = a_s * tmp
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a_m * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.3) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	t_0 = a_m * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.3:
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return a_s * tmp

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a_m * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.3)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return Float64(a_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	t_0 = a_m * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.3)
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = a_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a$95$m * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(a$95$s * If[LessEqual[m, 3.3], N[(t$95$0 / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.2999999999999998

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right) + 1}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right) + 1} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)} + 1} \]

      6. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, 10 + k, 1\right)}} \]

      7. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, \color{blue}{k + 10}, 1\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(k + 10\right) + 1}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(k + 10\right) + 1}} \]

   if 3.2999999999999998 < m

   1. Initial program 74.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  a_s
  (if (<= m 3.6)
    (* a_m (/ (pow k m) (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))))
    (* a_m (pow k m)))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.6) {
		tmp = a_m * (pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * pow(k, m);
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.6d0) then
        tmp = a_m * ((k ** m) / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0))))
    else
        tmp = a_m * (k ** m)
    end if
    code = a_s * tmp
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.6) {
		tmp = a_m * (Math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * Math.pow(k, m);
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.6:
		tmp = a_m * (math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))))
	else:
		tmp = a_m * math.pow(k, m)
	return a_s * tmp

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.6)
		tmp = Float64(a_m * Float64((k ^ m) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m * (k ^ m));
	end
	return Float64(a_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.6)
		tmp = a_m * ((k ^ m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = a_m * (k ^ m);
	end
	tmp_2 = a_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * If[LessEqual[m, 3.6], N[(a$95$m * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.60000000000000009 < m

   1. Initial program 74.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.8:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  a_s
  (if (<= m 2.8) (* a_m (/ (pow k m) (+ 1.0 (* k k)))) (* a_m (pow k m)))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.8) {
		tmp = a_m * (pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * k)));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * pow(k, m);
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.8d0) then
        tmp = a_m * ((k ** m) / (1.0d0 + (k * k)))
    else
        tmp = a_m * (k ** m)
    end if
    code = a_s * tmp
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.8) {
		tmp = a_m * (Math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * k)));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * Math.pow(k, m);
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.8:
		tmp = a_m * (math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * k)))
	else:
		tmp = a_m * math.pow(k, m)
	return a_s * tmp

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.8)
		tmp = Float64(a_m * Float64((k ^ m) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m * (k ^ m));
	end
	return Float64(a_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.8)
		tmp = a_m * ((k ^ m) / (1.0 + (k * k)));
	else
		tmp = a_m * (k ^ m);
	end
	tmp_2 = a_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * If[LessEqual[m, 2.8], N[(a$95$m * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.7999999999999998

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around inf 95.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]

   if 2.7999999999999998 < m

   1. Initial program 74.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 74.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.0021 \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a\_m}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  a_s
  (if (or (<= m -0.0021) (not (<= m 1.85e-5)))
    (* a_m (pow k m))
    (/ a_m (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -0.0021) || !(m <= 1.85e-5)) {
		tmp = a_m * pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= (-0.0021d0)) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.85d-5))) then
        tmp = a_m * (k ** m)
    else
        tmp = a_m / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = a_s * tmp
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -0.0021) || !(m <= 1.85e-5)) {
		tmp = a_m * Math.pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= -0.0021) or not (m <= 1.85e-5):
		tmp = a_m * math.pow(k, m)
	else:
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	return a_s * tmp

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= -0.0021) || !(m <= 1.85e-5))
		tmp = Float64(a_m * (k ^ m));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	end
	return Float64(a_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= -0.0021) || ~((m <= 1.85e-5)))
		tmp = a_m * (k ^ m);
	else
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = a_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * If[Or[LessEqual[m, -0.0021], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.85e-5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a$95$m * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -0.00209999999999999987 or 1.84999999999999991e-5 < m

   1. Initial program 87.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 87.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 87.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 87.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 87.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 87.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 87.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 87.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 87.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 87.2%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]

   if -0.00209999999999999987 < m < 1.84999999999999991e-5

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 95.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 95.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 95.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 95.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 95.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 95.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 95.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 95.4%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.0021 \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 54.7% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 175000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a\_m}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  a_s
  (if (<= m 175000000.0)
    (/ a_m (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))
    (* a_m (+ 1.0 (* k (- (* k 99.0) 10.0)))))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 175000000.0) {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 175000000.0d0) then
        tmp = a_m / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a_m * (1.0d0 + (k * ((k * 99.0d0) - 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = a_s * tmp
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 175000000.0) {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 175000000.0:
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a_m * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)))
	return a_s * tmp

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 175000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(a_m / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m * Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 99.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return Float64(a_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 175000000.0)
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a_m * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = a_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * If[LessEqual[m, 175000000.0], N[(a$95$m / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m * N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.75e8

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 1.75e8 < m

   1. Initial program 74.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 74.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 74.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 74.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 74.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 74.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 74.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 74.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 74.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 15.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(-10 \cdot a + -10 \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)\right) - \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 15.8%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(-10 \cdot a + -10 \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)\right) - \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 15.8%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot k\right) \cdot \left(-10 \cdot a + -10 \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)} - \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 15.8%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k\right)} \cdot \left(-10 \cdot a + -10 \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 15.8%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-10 \cdot \left(a + \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)\right)} - \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 15.8%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-10 \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a}\right)\right) - \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 15.8%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-10 \cdot \left(a + \color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right)\right) - \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt1-in 15.8%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-10 \cdot \left(a + -99 \cdot a\right)\right) - \color{blue}{\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a}\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 15.8%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-10 \cdot \left(a + -99 \cdot a\right)\right) - \color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 15.8%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-10 \cdot \left(a + -99 \cdot a\right)\right) - -99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      10. *-commutative 15.8%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-10 \cdot \left(a + -99 \cdot a\right)\right) - -99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 15.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-10 \cdot \left(a + -99 \cdot a\right)\right) - -99 \cdot a\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in k around 0 23.7%

      \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{99 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} + a \cdot -10\right) \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 23.7%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot k\right) \cdot 99} + a \cdot -10\right) \]

   11. Simplified 23.7%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot k\right) \cdot 99} + a \cdot -10\right) \]

   12. Taylor expanded in a around 0 32.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 175000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 46.6% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a\_m}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m + -10 \cdot \left(a\_m \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  a_s
  (if (<= m 2.4e+35)
    (/ a_m (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))
    (+ a_m (* -10.0 (* a_m k))))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.4e+35) {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.4d+35) then
        tmp = a_m / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a_m + ((-10.0d0) * (a_m * k))
    end if
    code = a_s * tmp
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.4e+35) {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.4e+35:
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k))
	return a_s * tmp

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.4e+35)
		tmp = Float64(a_m / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m + Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a_m * k)));
	end
	return Float64(a_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.4e+35)
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k));
	end
	tmp_2 = a_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * If[LessEqual[m, 2.4e+35], N[(a$95$m / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m + N[(-10.0 * N[(a$95$m * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.40000000000000015e35

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 67.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 2.40000000000000015e35 < m

   1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 10.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 10.4%

         \[\leadsto a + -10 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot a\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 10.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(k \cdot a\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 45.8% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a\_m}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m + -10 \cdot \left(a\_m \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  a_s
  (if (<= m 4.6e+34) (/ a_m (+ 1.0 (* k k))) (+ a_m (* -10.0 (* a_m k))))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.6e+34) {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 4.6d+34) then
        tmp = a_m / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = a_m + ((-10.0d0) * (a_m * k))
    end if
    code = a_s * tmp
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.6e+34) {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 4.6e+34:
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k))
	return a_s * tmp

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 4.6e+34)
		tmp = Float64(a_m / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m + Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a_m * k)));
	end
	return Float64(a_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 4.6e+34)
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k));
	end
	tmp_2 = a_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * If[LessEqual[m, 4.6e+34], N[(a$95$m / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m + N[(-10.0 * N[(a$95$m * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 4.5999999999999996e34

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 67.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around inf 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \color{blue}{k}} \]

   if 4.5999999999999996e34 < m

   1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 10.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 10.4%

         \[\leadsto a + -10 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot a\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 10.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(k \cdot a\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 29.7% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a\_m}{1 + k \cdot 10}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\_m + -10 \cdot \left(a\_m \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  a_s
  (if (<= m 1.4e+35) (/ a_m (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))) (+ a_m (* -10.0 (* a_m k))))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.4e+35) {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.4d+35) then
        tmp = a_m / (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0))
    else
        tmp = a_m + ((-10.0d0) * (a_m * k))
    end if
    code = a_s * tmp
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.4e+35) {
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k));
	}
	return a_s * tmp;
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.4e+35:
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * 10.0))
	else:
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k))
	return a_s * tmp

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.4e+35)
		tmp = Float64(a_m / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a_m + Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a_m * k)));
	end
	return Float64(a_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.4e+35)
		tmp = a_m / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	else
		tmp = a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k));
	end
	tmp_2 = a_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * If[LessEqual[m, 1.4e+35], N[(a$95$m / N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a$95$m + N[(-10.0 * N[(a$95$m * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.39999999999999999e35

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 96.9%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 67.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 43.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 43.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 43.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   if 1.39999999999999999e35 < m

   1. Initial program 72.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 72.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 10.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 10.4%

         \[\leadsto a + -10 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot a\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 10.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(k \cdot a\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 35.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 20.3% accurate, 16.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot \left(a\_m + -10 \cdot \left(a\_m \cdot k\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m) :precision binary64 (* a_s (+ a_m (* -10.0 (* a_m k)))))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	return a_s * (a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k)));
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a_s * (a_m + ((-10.0d0) * (a_m * k)))
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	return a_s * (a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k)));
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	return a_s * (a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k)))

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	return Float64(a_s * Float64(a_m + Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a_m * k))))
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = a_s * (a_m + (-10.0 * (a_m * k)));
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * N[(a$95$m + N[(-10.0 * N[(a$95$m * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.7%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 90.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 50.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 23.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 23.3%

      \[\leadsto a + -10 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot a\right)} \]

8. Simplified 23.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(k \cdot a\right)} \]

9. Final simplification 23.3%

   \[\leadsto a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right) \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 19.4% accurate, 114.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} a\_m = \left|a\right| \\ a\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, a\right) \\ a\_s \cdot a\_m \end{array} \]

FPCore

a\_m = (fabs.f64 a)
a\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) a)
(FPCore (a_s a_m k m) :precision binary64 (* a_s a_m))

C

a\_m = fabs(a);
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a);
double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	return a_s * a_m;
}

Fortran

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0d0, a)
real(8) function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_s
    real(8), intent (in) :: a_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a_s * a_m
end function

Java

a\_m = Math.abs(a);
a\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, a);
public static double code(double a_s, double a_m, double k, double m) {
	return a_s * a_m;
}

Python

a\_m = math.fabs(a)
a\_s = math.copysign(1.0, a)
def code(a_s, a_m, k, m):
	return a_s * a_m

Julia

a\_m = abs(a)
a\_s = copysign(1.0, a)
function code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	return Float64(a_s * a_m)
end

MATLAB

a\_m = abs(a);
a\_s = sign(a) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(a_s, a_m, k, m)
	tmp = a_s * a_m;
end

Wolfram

a\_m = N[Abs[a], $MachinePrecision]
a\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[a]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[a$95$s_, a$95$m_, k_, m_] := N[(a$95$s * a$95$m), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.7%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 90.7%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 90.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 50.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 22.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024155 
(FPCore (a k m)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))