VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)

Percentage Accurate: 76.3% → 99.3%

Time: 21.6s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 8.1×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. F = -7.338601216403322e-200
  2. l = 2802783823347375.5

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 1e+15)
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) F) F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 1e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 1e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 1e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / F) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 1e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / F) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 1e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((tan((pi * l_m)) / F) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 1e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 1e15

   1. Initial program 86.8%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 88.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

      3. associate-/r* 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   if 1e15 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 59.9%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in l around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.4% accurate, 6.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 50:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\pi \cdot \frac{l\_m}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 50.0) (- (* PI l_m) (/ (* PI (/ l_m F)) F)) (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 50.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((((double) M_PI) * (l_m / F)) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 50.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.PI * (l_m / F)) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 50.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.pi * (l_m / F)) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 50.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(pi * Float64(l_m / F)) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 50.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((pi * (l_m / F)) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 50.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(Pi * N[(l$95$m / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 50

   1. Initial program 86.6%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

      3. associate-/r* 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{F}}}{F} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}}}{F} \]

   7. Simplified 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}}}{F} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in l around 0 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{F}}}{F} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell}}{F}}{F} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}}}{F} \]

   10. Simplified 85.0%

       \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}}}{F} \]

   if 50 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 61.8%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in l around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 50:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\pi \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.4% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 1650:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{l\_m \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (if (<= l_m 1650.0) (- (* PI l_m) (/ (* l_m (/ PI F)) F)) (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1650.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((l_m * (((double) M_PI) / F)) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1650.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((l_m * (Math.PI / F)) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 1650.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((l_m * (math.pi / F)) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 1650.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(l_m * Float64(pi / F)) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 1650.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((l_m * (pi / F)) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 1650.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(l$95$m * N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 1650

   1. Initial program 86.6%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

      3. associate-/r* 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{F}}}{F} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}}}{F} \]

   7. Simplified 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}}}{F} \]

   if 1650 < l

   1. Initial program 61.8%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in l around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 1650:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 92.9% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 1650:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\frac{\pi}{F}}{F}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (if (<= l_m 1650.0) (* l_m (- PI (/ (/ PI F) F))) (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1650.0) {
		tmp = l_m * (((double) M_PI) - ((((double) M_PI) / F) / F));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1650.0) {
		tmp = l_m * (Math.PI - ((Math.PI / F) / F));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 1650.0:
		tmp = l_m * (math.pi - ((math.pi / F) / F))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 1650.0)
		tmp = Float64(l_m * Float64(pi - Float64(Float64(pi / F) / F)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 1650.0)
		tmp = l_m * (pi - ((pi / F) / F));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 1650.0], N[(l$95$m * N[(Pi - N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 1650

   1. Initial program 86.6%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\pi}{{F}^{2}}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-un-lft-identity 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \pi}}{{F}^{2}}\right) \]

      2. unpow2 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{1 \cdot \pi}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}}\right) \]

      3. times-frac 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}}\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}}\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}}{F}}\right) \]

      2. *-lft-identity 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F}}}{F}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\pi}{F}}{F}}\right) \]

   if 1650 < l

   1. Initial program 61.8%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in l around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 1650:\\ \;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\frac{\pi}{F}}{F}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 73.2% accurate, 37.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m) :precision binary64 (* l_s (* PI l_m)))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (((double) M_PI) * l_m);
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (Math.PI * l_m);
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * (math.pi * l_m)

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(pi * l_m))
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * (pi * l_m);
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 80.4%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in l around inf 71.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]

4. Final simplification 71.4%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024152 
(FPCore (F l)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))