Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 88.7% → 99.8%

Time: 16.4s

Alternatives: 18

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 88.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(-1 + x, \log y, -t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma (+ z -1.0) (log1p (- y)) (fma (+ -1.0 x) (log y) (- t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((z + -1.0), log1p(-y), fma((-1.0 + x), log(y), -t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(Float64(z + -1.0), log1p(Float64(-y)), fma(Float64(-1.0 + x), log(y), Float64(-t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + (-t)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) + \left(-t\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(-t\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right)} \]

   4. fma-define 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right)} \]

   5. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   8. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   9. fma-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, -t\right)}\right) \]

   10. sub-neg 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, -t\right)\right) \]

   11. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, -t\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, -t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(-1 + x, \log y, -t\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(-1 + x, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (fma (+ -1.0 x) (log y) (* (+ z -1.0) (log1p (- y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((-1.0 + x), log(y), ((z + -1.0) * log1p(-y))) - t;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(fma(Float64(-1.0 + x), log(y), Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * log1p(Float64(-y)))) - t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-1 + x, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) + \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (*
    (+ z -1.0)
    (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5)))))
   (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) + ((-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((z + (-1.0d0)) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) + (((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) + ((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) + ((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) + Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) + ((-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) + \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) + \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ z -1.0) (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5)))))
   (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) + ((-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((z + (-1.0d0)) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) + (((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) + ((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) + ((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) + Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) + ((-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) + \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 95.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1320000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 - z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))))
   (if (or (<= t -2.7e-11) (not (<= t 1320000000000.0)))
     (- t_1 t)
     (- t_1 (* z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (-1.0 + x) * log(y);
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -2.7e-11) || !(t <= 1320000000000.0)) {
		tmp = t_1 - t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 - (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = ((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)
    if ((t <= (-2.7d-11)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1320000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = t_1 - t
    else
        tmp = t_1 - (z * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y);
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -2.7e-11) || !(t <= 1320000000000.0)) {
		tmp = t_1 - t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 - (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -2.7e-11) or not (t <= 1320000000000.0):
		tmp = t_1 - t
	else:
		tmp = t_1 - (z * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -2.7e-11) || !(t <= 1320000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(t_1 - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_1 - Float64(z * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (-1.0 + x) * log(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -2.7e-11) || ~((t <= 1320000000000.0)))
		tmp = t_1 - t;
	else
		tmp = t_1 - (z * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t, -2.7e-11], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1320000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t$95$1 - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$1 - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -2.70000000000000005e-11 or 1.32e12 < t

   1. Initial program 92.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   if -2.70000000000000005e-11 < t < 1.32e12

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{z} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   8. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

   9. Taylor expanded in t around 0 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. neg-mul-1 98.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) \]

       2. distribute-lft-neg-in 98.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) \]

       3. sub-neg 98.5%

          \[\leadsto \left(-y\right) \cdot z + \log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

       4. metadata-eval 98.5%

          \[\leadsto \left(-y\right) \cdot z + \log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

       5. +-commutative 98.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) + \left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

       6. cancel-sign-sub-inv 98.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot z} \]

       7. +-commutative 98.5%

          \[\leadsto \log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot z \]

   11. Simplified 98.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1320000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) + \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (+ z -1.0) (* y (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5)))) (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) + ((-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((z + (-1.0d0)) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0))))) + (((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) + ((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) + ((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5)))) + Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) + ((-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) + \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 89.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+216}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-t\right) - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5e+216)
   (- (- t) (* z y))
   (if (<= z 5.4e+161)
     (- (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) t)
     (- (* z (log1p (- y))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5e+216) {
		tmp = -t - (z * y);
	} else if (z <= 5.4e+161) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * log1p(-y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5e+216) {
		tmp = -t - (z * y);
	} else if (z <= 5.4e+161) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * Math.log1p(-y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5e+216:
		tmp = -t - (z * y)
	elif z <= 5.4e+161:
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (z * math.log1p(-y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5e+216)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-t) - Float64(z * y));
	elseif (z <= 5.4e+161)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * log1p(Float64(-y))) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5e+216], N[((-t) - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 5.4e+161], N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -4.9999999999999998e216

   1. Initial program 55.1%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 55.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      2. pow3 55.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 55.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)}\right) - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z - t \]

   10. Simplified 74.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

   if -4.9999999999999998e216 < z < 5.3999999999999995e161

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   if 5.3999999999999995e161 < z

   1. Initial program 50.8%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 50.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{z} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 30.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 30.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. log1p-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]

   8. Simplified 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+216}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-t\right) - z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 86.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1.15e-19)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (- (- y (log y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.15e-19)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y - log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.15d-19))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = (y - log(y)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.15e-19)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y - Math.log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 1.15e-19):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (y - math.log(y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.15e-19))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y - log(y)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 1.15e-19)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = (y - log(y)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.15e-19]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1.1499999999999999e-19 < x

   1. Initial program 91.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{z} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   8. Simplified 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   if -1 < x < 1.1499999999999999e-19

   1. Initial program 78.6%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 78.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      2. pow3 78.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)}\right) - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. unsub-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]

      4. mul-1-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      6. metadata-eval 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(-y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      7. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(--1\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      10. metadata-eval 98.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1} + \left(-z\right)\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      11. sub-neg 98.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

   10. Simplified 98.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]

   11. Taylor expanded in z around 0 76.7%

       \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y} - \log y\right) - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 86.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-t\right) - \log y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1.15e-19)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (- (- t) (log y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.15e-19)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = -t - log(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.15d-19))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = -t - log(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.15e-19)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = -t - Math.log(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 1.15e-19):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = -t - math.log(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.15e-19))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-t) - log(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 1.15e-19)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = -t - log(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.15e-19]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[((-t) - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1.1499999999999999e-19 < x

   1. Initial program 91.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{z} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   8. Simplified 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   if -1 < x < 1.1499999999999999e-19

   1. Initial program 78.6%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 78.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      2. pow3 78.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)}\right) - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. unsub-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]

      4. mul-1-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      6. metadata-eval 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(-y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      7. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(--1\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      10. metadata-eval 98.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1} + \left(-z\right)\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      11. sub-neg 98.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

   10. Simplified 98.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]

   11. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(t + \log y\right)} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 76.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(t + \log y\right)} \]

       2. distribute-neg-in 76.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) + \left(-\log y\right)} \]

       3. unsub-neg 76.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) - \log y} \]

   13. Simplified 76.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) - \log y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-t\right) - \log y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 75.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+20} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-t\right) - \log y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -8.2e+20) (not (<= x 1.25e+16)))
   (* x (log y))
   (- (- t) (log y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.2e+20) || !(x <= 1.25e+16)) {
		tmp = x * log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = -t - log(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-8.2d+20)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.25d+16))) then
        tmp = x * log(y)
    else
        tmp = -t - log(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -8.2e+20) || !(x <= 1.25e+16)) {
		tmp = x * Math.log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = -t - Math.log(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -8.2e+20) or not (x <= 1.25e+16):
		tmp = x * math.log(y)
	else:
		tmp = -t - math.log(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -8.2e+20) || !(x <= 1.25e+16))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-t) - log(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -8.2e+20) || ~((x <= 1.25e+16)))
		tmp = x * log(y);
	else
		tmp = -t - log(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -8.2e+20], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.25e+16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[((-t) - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -8.2e20 or 1.25e16 < x

   1. Initial program 91.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{z} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   8. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 73.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} \]

   11. Simplified 73.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} \]

   if -8.2e20 < x < 1.25e16

   1. Initial program 79.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      2. pow3 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)}\right) - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \log y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. unsub-neg 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]

      4. mul-1-neg 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      6. metadata-eval 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(-y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      7. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      8. distribute-rgt-neg-in 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      9. distribute-neg-in 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(--1\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      10. metadata-eval 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1} + \left(-z\right)\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      11. sub-neg 97.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

   10. Simplified 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]

   11. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(t + \log y\right)} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 75.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(t + \log y\right)} \]

       2. distribute-neg-in 75.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) + \left(-\log y\right)} \]

       3. unsub-neg 75.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) - \log y} \]

   13. Simplified 75.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) - \log y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{+20} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-t\right) - \log y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 66.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+25} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.7e+25) (not (<= x 5.6e+72)))
   (* x (log y))
   (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.7e+25) || !(x <= 5.6e+72)) {
		tmp = x * log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.7d+25)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.6d+72))) then
        tmp = x * log(y)
    else
        tmp = (y * (1.0d0 - z)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.7e+25) || !(x <= 5.6e+72)) {
		tmp = x * Math.log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.7e+25) or not (x <= 5.6e+72):
		tmp = x * math.log(y)
	else:
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.7e+25) || !(x <= 5.6e+72))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.7e+25) || ~((x <= 5.6e+72)))
		tmp = x * log(y);
	else
		tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.7e+25], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.6e+72]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.6999999999999999e25 or 5.5999999999999998e72 < x

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{z} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   8. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 76.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} \]

   11. Simplified 76.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} \]

   if -3.6999999999999999e25 < x < 5.5999999999999998e72

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      2. pow3 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)}\right) - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 61.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 61.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 61.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 61.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(-y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      4. +-commutative 61.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 61.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

      6. distribute-neg-in 61.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(--1\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. metadata-eval 61.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1} + \left(-z\right)\right) - t \]

      8. sub-neg 61.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} - t \]

   10. Simplified 61.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+25} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{+72}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 99.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - \left(z + -1\right) \cdot y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (- (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) (* (+ z -1.0) y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - ((z + -1.0) * y)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) - ((z + (-1.0d0)) * y)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) - ((z + -1.0) * y)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) - ((z + -1.0) * y)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - ((z + -1.0) * y)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. mul-1-neg 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. unsub-neg 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. +-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   9. +-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

7. Simplified 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

8. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - \left(z + -1\right) \cdot y\right) - t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 99.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - z \cdot y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) (* z y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) - (z * y)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) - (z * y)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) - (z * y)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - Float64(z * y)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - (z * y)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. mul-1-neg 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. unsub-neg 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. +-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   9. +-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

7. Simplified 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right) - t \]

9. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - z \cdot y\right) - t \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 43.3% accurate, 15.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1450000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -2.7e-11) (not (<= t 1450000000000.0))) (- t) (* z (- y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -2.7e-11) || !(t <= 1450000000000.0)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-2.7d-11)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1450000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = -t
    else
        tmp = z * -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -2.7e-11) || !(t <= 1450000000000.0)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -2.7e-11) or not (t <= 1450000000000.0):
		tmp = -t
	else:
		tmp = z * -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -2.7e-11) || !(t <= 1450000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(-t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -2.7e-11) || ~((t <= 1450000000000.0)))
		tmp = -t;
	else
		tmp = z * -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -2.7e-11], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1450000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-t), N[(z * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -2.70000000000000005e-11 or 1.45e12 < t

   1. Initial program 92.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 65.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   7. Simplified 65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   if -2.70000000000000005e-11 < t < 1.45e12

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      4. sub-neg 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      5. metadata-eval 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 79.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. log1p-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{z} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right) - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

      2. mul-1-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z\right) - t \]

   8. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z}\right) - t \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around inf 22.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. neg-mul-1 22.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y \cdot z} \]

       2. distribute-lft-neg-in 22.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

       3. *-commutative 22.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 22.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1450000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 46.6% accurate, 30.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (1.0d0 - z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cbrt-cube 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   2. pow3 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

4. Applied egg-rr 84.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)}\right) - t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

7. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   4. +-commutative 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 45.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. distribute-neg-in 45.1%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(--1\right) + \left(-z\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. metadata-eval 45.1%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1} + \left(-z\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 45.1%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} - t \]

10. Simplified 45.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} - t \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 46.4% accurate, 35.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-t\right) - z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- t) (* z y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t - (z * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t - (z * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t - (z * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t - (z * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(-t) - Float64(z * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t - (z * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[((-t) - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cbrt-cube 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   2. pow3 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

4. Applied egg-rr 84.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)}\right) - t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

7. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 44.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 44.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

   2. mul-1-neg 44.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z - t \]

10. Simplified 44.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

11. Final simplification 44.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-t\right) - z \cdot y \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 17: 35.7% accurate, 107.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-t)

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 30.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 30.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

7. Simplified 30.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 18: 2.3% accurate, 215.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   4. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   5. metadata-eval 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]

   6. sub-neg 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 30.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 30.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

7. Simplified 30.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-sub0 30.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - t} \]

   2. sub-neg 30.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-t\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 14.9%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-t} \cdot \sqrt{-t}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 7.8%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-t\right) \cdot \left(-t\right)}} \]

   5. sqr-neg 7.8%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{t \cdot t}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 1.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{t} \cdot \sqrt{t}} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{t} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 2.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + t} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-lft-identity 2.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

11. Simplified 2.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024152 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))