Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.8% → 99.9%

Time: 18.7s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 3.0×

• 30.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\\ t_1 := \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\\ t_2 := t\_0 \cdot t\_1\\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - t\_2\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-t\_0, t\_1, t\_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (sin (* 0.5 phi1))) (t_1 (sin (* 0.5 phi2))) (t_2 (* t_0 t_1)))
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (*
      (- lambda1 lambda2)
      (+
       (- (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) t_2)
       (fma (- t_0) t_1 t_2)))
     (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = sin((0.5 * phi1));
	double t_1 = sin((0.5 * phi2));
	double t_2 = t_0 * t_1;
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * (((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) - t_2) + fma(-t_0, t_1, t_2))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1))
	t_1 = sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))
	t_2 = Float64(t_0 * t_1)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * Float64(Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) - t_2) + fma(Float64(-t_0), t_1, t_2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$0 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] + N[((-t$95$0) * t$95$1 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.4%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 96.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 96.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 96.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 96.4%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. rem-log-exp 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-lft-in 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-un-lft-identity 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. prod-diff 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, -\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot 1\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

    1. fma-undefine 99.8%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \left(-\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right)} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

    2. *-commutative 99.8%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} + \left(-\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

    3. fma-undefine 99.8%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), -\left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)} + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), 1, \left(\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot 1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

12. Simplified 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (-
     (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (cos (* 0.5 phi2)))
     (* (sin (* 0.5 phi1)) (sin (* 0.5 phi2)))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (sin((0.5 * phi1)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (Math.sin((0.5 * phi1)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (math.sin((0.5 * phi1)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))) - Float64(sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi2))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * ((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((0.5 * phi2))) - (sin((0.5 * phi1)) * sin((0.5 * phi2))))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.4%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 96.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 96.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 96.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 96.4%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. rem-log-exp 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-lft-in 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 93.0% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 950000:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 950000.0)
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 950000.0) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 950000.0) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 950000.0:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 950000.0)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 950000.0)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 950000.0], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 9.5e5

   1. Initial program 62.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 90.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if 9.5e5 < phi2

   1. Initial program 62.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 96.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 96.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 73.6% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 3.5e-45)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (* R (hypot (* lambda1 (cos (* 0.5 phi2))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 3.5e-45) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 3.5e-45) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 3.5e-45:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 3.5e-45)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 3.5e-45)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * cos((0.5 * phi2))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 3.5e-45], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 3.5e-45

   1. Initial program 62.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 91.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 91.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 49.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 49.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 49.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 68.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 68.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   if 3.5e-45 < phi2

   1. Initial program 63.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 87.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 95.8% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.4%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 90.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.4%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 89.0%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 89.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Simplified 89.0%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 68.1% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{-20}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 2.1e-20)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (* phi2 (- R (* R (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.1e-20) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.1e-20) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2.1e-20:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2.1e-20)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(R * Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2.1e-20)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 2.1e-20], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(R * N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.0999999999999999e-20

   1. Initial program 61.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 49.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 49.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 69.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 69.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   if 2.0999999999999999e-20 < phi2

   1. Initial program 64.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 66.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 66.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 69.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 55.9% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1, \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 4.5e-24)
   (* R (hypot lambda1 phi1))
   (* phi2 (- R (* R (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e-24) {
		tmp = R * hypot(lambda1, phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e-24) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(lambda1, phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 4.5e-24:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(lambda1, phi1)
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e-24)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(lambda1, phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(R * Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e-24)
		tmp = R * hypot(lambda1, phi1);
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 4.5e-24], N[(R * N[Sqrt[lambda1 ^ 2 + phi1 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(R * N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 4.4999999999999997e-24

   1. Initial program 61.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 78.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 43.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\lambda_1}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. unpow2 43.0%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \lambda_1} + {\phi_1}^{2}} \]

       2. unpow2 43.0%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\lambda_1 \cdot \lambda_1 + \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1}} \]

       3. hypot-define 56.6%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1, \phi_1\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 56.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1, \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 4.4999999999999997e-24 < phi2

   1. Initial program 64.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 66.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 66.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 69.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 29.9% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 5.4e+63)
   (* phi1 (- (* R (/ phi2 phi1)) R))
   (* phi2 (- R (* R (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.4e+63) {
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 5.4d+63) then
        tmp = phi1 * ((r * (phi2 / phi1)) - r)
    else
        tmp = phi2 * (r - (r * (phi1 / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.4e+63) {
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 5.4e+63:
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R)
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 5.4e+63)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(R * Float64(phi2 / phi1)) - R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(R * Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 5.4e+63)
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 5.4e+63], N[(phi1 * N[(N[(R * N[(phi2 / phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - R), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(R * N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 5.40000000000000035e63

   1. Initial program 62.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 22.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 22.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 22.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 22.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 22.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-/l* 23.3%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 23.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]

   if 5.40000000000000035e63 < phi2

   1. Initial program 62.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 82.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 35.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 29.3% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + -1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 4.8e+63)
   (* R (* phi1 (+ (/ phi2 phi1) -1.0)))
   (* phi2 (- R (* R (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.8e+63) {
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 4.8d+63) then
        tmp = r * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + (-1.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = phi2 * (r - (r * (phi1 / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.8e+63) {
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 4.8e+63:
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0))
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 4.8e+63)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(phi2 / phi1) + -1.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(R * Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 4.8e+63)
		tmp = R * (phi1 * ((phi2 / phi1) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 4.8e+63], N[(R * N[(phi1 * N[(N[(phi2 / phi1), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(R * N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 4.8e63

   1. Initial program 62.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 22.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 22.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 22.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)} \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 22.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 22.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 22.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]

   if 4.8e63 < phi2

   1. Initial program 62.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 95.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 82.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 34.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} + -1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 30.1% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-71}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 3.2e-71) (* R (- phi1)) (* R (* phi2 (- 1.0 (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 3.2e-71) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 3.2d-71) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else
        tmp = r * (phi2 * (1.0d0 - (phi1 / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 3.2e-71) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 3.2e-71:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 3.2e-71)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 * Float64(1.0 - Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 3.2e-71)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 3.2e-71], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 * N[(1.0 - N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 3.1999999999999999e-71

   1. Initial program 61.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 21.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 21.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 21.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 21.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)} \]

   if 3.1999999999999999e-71 < phi2

   1. Initial program 64.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 63.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 63.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 63.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 63.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 28.2% accurate, 36.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.95 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -2.95e+26) (* R (- phi1)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.95e+26) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-2.95d+26)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -2.95e+26) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -2.95e+26:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -2.95e+26)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -2.95e+26)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -2.95e+26], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -2.95000000000000015e26

   1. Initial program 57.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 94.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)} \]

   if -2.95000000000000015e26 < phi1

   1. Initial program 63.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 23.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 17.3% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.4%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 21.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 14.3% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \lambda_1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R lambda1))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda1;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * lambda1
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda1;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * lambda1

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * lambda1)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * lambda1;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * lambda1), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 62.4%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 17.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 17.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]

7. Simplified 17.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]

8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 13.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 13.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

10. Simplified 13.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

11. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 12.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_1} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024151 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))