b parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.0s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 1.0×

• 41.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (fma (- 1.0 m) (/ m v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * fma((1.0 - m), (m / v), -1.0);
}

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * fma(Float64(1.0 - m), Float64(m / v), -1.0))
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \]

   3. associate-/l* 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \]

   4. fmm-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]

   5. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - m, \frac{m}{v}, -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.62:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - \frac{m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot -2\right)}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m + -1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}} - -1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 0.62)
   (- -1.0 (/ (* m (- -1.0 (* m -2.0))) v))
   (* (+ m -1.0) (- (/ m (/ v m)) -1.0))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.62) {
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m + -1.0) * ((m / (v / m)) - -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 0.62d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) - ((m * ((-1.0d0) - (m * (-2.0d0)))) / v)
    else
        tmp = (m + (-1.0d0)) * ((m / (v / m)) - (-1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.62) {
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (m + -1.0) * ((m / (v / m)) - -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 0.62:
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v)
	else:
		tmp = (m + -1.0) * ((m / (v / m)) - -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 0.62)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 - Float64(Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * -2.0))) / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m + -1.0) * Float64(Float64(m / Float64(v / m)) - -1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 0.62)
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v);
	else
		tmp = (m + -1.0) * ((m / (v / m)) - -1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 0.62], N[(-1.0 - N[(N[(m * N[(-1.0 - N[(m * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / N[(v / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 0.619999999999999996

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \left(-2 \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + -2 \cdot m\right)}{v}} - 1 \]

   if 0.619999999999999996 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

      2. div-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \cdot m + -1\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{v} \cdot m\right)} + -1\right) \]

      4. associate-/r/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      5. un-div-inv 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   9. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.62:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - \frac{m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot -2\right)}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(m + -1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}} - -1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.62:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - \frac{m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot -2\right)}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 0.62)
   (- -1.0 (/ (* m (- -1.0 (* m -2.0))) v))
   (* (- 1.0 m) (- -1.0 (* m (/ m v))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.62) {
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 0.62d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) - ((m * ((-1.0d0) - (m * (-2.0d0)))) / v)
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) - (m * (m / v)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.62) {
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 0.62:
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v)
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 0.62)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 - Float64(Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * -2.0))) / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * Float64(m / v))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 0.62)
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v);
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 0.62], N[(-1.0 - N[(N[(m * N[(-1.0 - N[(m * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 - N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 0.619999999999999996

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \left(-2 \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + -2 \cdot m\right)}{v}} - 1 \]

   if 0.619999999999999996 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot m}}{v} + -1\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{v} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.62:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - \frac{m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot -2\right)}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.41:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - \frac{m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot -2\right)}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v} - -1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 0.41)
   (- -1.0 (/ (* m (- -1.0 (* m -2.0))) v))
   (* m (- (* m (/ m v)) -1.0))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.41) {
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 0.41d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) - ((m * ((-1.0d0) - (m * (-2.0d0)))) / v)
    else
        tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - (-1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.41) {
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 0.41:
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v)
	else:
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 0.41)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 - Float64(Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * -2.0))) / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m * Float64(m / v)) - -1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 0.41)
		tmp = -1.0 - ((m * (-1.0 - (m * -2.0))) / v);
	else
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 0.41], N[(-1.0 - N[(N[(m * N[(-1.0 - N[(m * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 0.409999999999999976

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \left(-2 \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + -2 \cdot m\right)}{v}} - 1 \]

   if 0.409999999999999976 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot m}}{v} + -1\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{v} + -1\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot m\right)} \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{-m}{v} + -1\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   10. Simplified 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{-m}{v} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.41:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - \frac{m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot -2\right)}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v} - -1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.4:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - m \cdot \frac{-1 - m \cdot -2}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v} - -1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 0.4)
   (- -1.0 (* m (/ (- -1.0 (* m -2.0)) v)))
   (* m (- (* m (/ m v)) -1.0))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.4) {
		tmp = -1.0 - (m * ((-1.0 - (m * -2.0)) / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 0.4d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) - (m * (((-1.0d0) - (m * (-2.0d0))) / v))
    else
        tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - (-1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.4) {
		tmp = -1.0 - (m * ((-1.0 - (m * -2.0)) / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 0.4:
		tmp = -1.0 - (m * ((-1.0 - (m * -2.0)) / v))
	else:
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 0.4)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * Float64(Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * -2.0)) / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m * Float64(m / v)) - -1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 0.4)
		tmp = -1.0 - (m * ((-1.0 - (m * -2.0)) / v));
	else
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 0.4], N[(-1.0 - N[(m * N[(N[(-1.0 - N[(m * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 0.40000000000000002

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \left(-2 \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 97.7%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 + -2 \cdot m}{v}} - 1 \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{1 + \color{blue}{m \cdot -2}}{v} - 1 \]

   8. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 + m \cdot -2}{v}} - 1 \]

   if 0.40000000000000002 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot m}}{v} + -1\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{v} + -1\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot m\right)} \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{-m}{v} + -1\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   10. Simplified 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{-m}{v} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.4:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - m \cdot \frac{-1 - m \cdot -2}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v} - -1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 98.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.44:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v} - -1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 0.44) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (* m (- (* m (/ m v)) -1.0))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.44) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 0.44d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - (-1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.44) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 0.44:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 0.44)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m * Float64(m / v)) - -1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 0.44)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = m * ((m * (m / v)) - -1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 0.44], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 0.440000000000000002

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 0.440000000000000002 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot m}}{v} + -1\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{v} + -1\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot m\right)} \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{-m}{v} + -1\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{\frac{v}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   10. Simplified 97.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{-m}{v} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.44:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{m}{v} - -1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{m \cdot \left(m + -1\right)}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (* (- 1.0 m) (- -1.0 (/ (* m (+ m -1.0)) v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - ((m * (m + -1.0)) / v));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) - ((m * (m + (-1.0d0))) / v))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - ((m * (m + -1.0)) / v));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - ((m * (m + -1.0)) / v))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(Float64(m * Float64(m + -1.0)) / v)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - ((m * (m + -1.0)) / v));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 - N[(N[(m * N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 - \frac{m \cdot \left(m + -1\right)}{v}\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m + -1}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (* (- 1.0 m) (- -1.0 (* m (/ (+ m -1.0) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * ((m + -1.0) / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) - (m * ((m + (-1.0d0)) / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * ((m + -1.0) / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * ((m + -1.0) / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m + -1.0) / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * ((m + -1.0) / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 - N[(m * N[(N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m + -1}{v}\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 60.3% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-220}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m + \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.15e-220) -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.15e-220) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m + (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.15d-220) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m + (m / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.15e-220) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m + (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.15e-220:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m + (m / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.15e-220)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m + Float64(m / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.15e-220)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m + (m / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.15e-220], -1.0, N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.1499999999999999e-220

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 1.1499999999999999e-220 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around inf 57.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 68.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + 1\right)} - 1 \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v} + m \cdot 1\right)} - 1 \]

      3. div-inv 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + m \cdot 1\right) - 1 \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m}\right) - 1 \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} + m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-220}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m + \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 60.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-221}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 2.2e-221) -1.0 (* m (/ 1.0 v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2e-221) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m * (1.0 / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.2d-221) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m * (1.0d0 / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.2e-221) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m * (1.0 / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.2e-221:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m * (1.0 / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.2e-221)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(1.0 / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.2e-221)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m * (1.0 / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.2e-221], -1.0, N[(m * N[(1.0 / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.20000000000000001e-221

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 2.20000000000000001e-221 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around inf 57.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 57.4%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 75.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (-1.0d0) + (m + (m / v))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m + Float64(m / v)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(-1.0 + N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 72.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v} + m \cdot 1\right)} - 1 \]

   3. div-inv 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + m \cdot 1\right) - 1 \]

   4. *-rgt-identity 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m}\right) - 1 \]

7. Applied egg-rr 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + m\right)} - 1 \]

8. Final simplification 72.8%

   \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 26.7% accurate, 2.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.4e-49) -1.0 m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.4e-49) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.4d-49) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.4e-49) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.4e-49:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.4e-49)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.4e-49)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.4e-49], -1.0, m]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.39999999999999999e-49

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 49.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 1.39999999999999999e-49 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 55.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around inf 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in v around inf 5.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 75.5% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{m}{v} + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ (/ m v) -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (m / v) + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (m / v) + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (m / v) + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (m / v) + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) + \left(1 - m\right) \cdot -1} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]

   3. neg-mul-1 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(1 - m\right)\right)} \]

   4. associate-*r/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} + \left(-\left(1 - m\right)\right) \]

   5. div-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} + \left(-\left(1 - m\right)\right) \]

   6. associate-*r* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{v}} + \left(-\left(1 - m\right)\right) \]

   7. fma-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right), \frac{1}{v}, -\left(1 - m\right)\right)} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right), \frac{1}{v}, -\left(1 - m\right)\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fmm-undef 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{v} - \left(1 - m\right)} \]

8. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{v} - \left(1 - m\right)} \]

9. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{v} - \color{blue}{1} \]

10. Taylor expanded in m around 0 72.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} - 1 \]

11. Final simplification 72.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} + -1 \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 26.9% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ m -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in v around inf 22.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 22.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 - m\right)} \]

   2. neg-sub0 22.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - \left(1 - m\right)} \]

   3. associate--r- 22.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - 1\right) + m} \]

   4. metadata-eval 22.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + m \]

7. Simplified 22.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + m} \]

8. Final simplification 22.6%

   \[\leadsto m + -1 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 24.4% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 20.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024151 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "b parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))