Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 81.8% → 94.7%

Time: 9.2s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 81.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 94.7% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+242}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, y \cdot \left(-t\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* z (* 2.0 z)) (* y t))) 4e+242)
   (- x (* (* y 2.0) (/ z (fma (* 2.0 z) z (* y (- t))))))
   (- x (/ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / ((z * (2.0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= 4e+242) {
		tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) * (z / fma((2.0 * z), z, (y * -t))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(2.0 * z)) - Float64(y * t))) <= 4e+242)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * Float64(z / fma(Float64(2.0 * z), z, Float64(y * Float64(-t))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 4e+242], N[(x - N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / N[(N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * z + N[(y * (-t)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t))) < 4.0000000000000002e242

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z} - y \cdot t} \]

      2. fmm-def 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 2, z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \]

      3. *-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}, z, -y \cdot t\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-t\right)}\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, y \cdot \left(-t\right)\right)}} \]

   if 4.0000000000000002e242 < (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t)))

   1. Initial program 0.3%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 84.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   7. Simplified 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+242}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, y \cdot \left(-t\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{t\_1 - y \cdot t} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+242}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y \cdot t - t\_1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* z (* 2.0 z))))
   (if (<= (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- t_1 (* y t))) 4e+242)
     (+ x (* (* y 2.0) (/ z (- (* y t) t_1))))
     (- x (/ y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 4e+242) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = z * (2.0d0 * z)
    if ((((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 4d+242) then
        tmp = x + ((y * 2.0d0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)))
    else
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 4e+242) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = z * (2.0 * z)
	tmp = 0
	if (((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 4e+242:
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(2.0 * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(t_1 - Float64(y * t))) <= 4e+242)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * Float64(z / Float64(Float64(y * t) - t_1))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 4e+242)
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	else
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 4e+242], N[(x + N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t))) < 4.0000000000000002e242

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.0000000000000002e242 < (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t)))

   1. Initial program 0.3%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 84.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 84.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   7. Simplified 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+242}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y \cdot t - z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-23}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot -2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.9e-29) (not (<= z 5.2e-23)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (/ (* z -2.0) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.9e-29) || !(z <= 5.2e-23)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.9d-29)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.2d-23))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - ((z * (-2.0d0)) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.9e-29) || !(z <= 5.2e-23)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.9e-29) or not (z <= 5.2e-23):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.9e-29) || !(z <= 5.2e-23))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(z * -2.0) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.9e-29) || ~((z <= 5.2e-23)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.9e-29], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.2e-23]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(z * -2.0), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.89999999999999988e-29 or 5.2e-23 < z

   1. Initial program 69.8%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   7. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -1.89999999999999988e-29 < z < 5.2e-23

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 94.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. *-commutative 94.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot -2}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 94.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot -2}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-23}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot -2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 81.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-81} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.8e-81) (not (<= z 5.5e-59))) (- x (/ y z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.8e-81) || !(z <= 5.5e-59)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.8d-81)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.5d-59))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.8e-81) || !(z <= 5.5e-59)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.8e-81) or not (z <= 5.5e-59):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.8e-81) || !(z <= 5.5e-59))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.8e-81) || ~((z <= 5.5e-59)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.8e-81], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.5e-59]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.7999999999999999e-81 or 5.50000000000000014e-59 < z

   1. Initial program 72.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 86.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 86.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   7. Simplified 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -3.7999999999999999e-81 < z < 5.50000000000000014e-59

   1. Initial program 90.5%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-81} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.6% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 80.0%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

3. Simplified 90.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024151 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- x (/ 1 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2) z)))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))