Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 13.4s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
     -1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 25.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot \left(2 + u \cdot \left(2 - u \cdot -2.6666666666666665\right)\right) - \log \pi\right) + \left(\log s - 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (+
   (- (* u (+ 2.0 (* u (- 2.0 (* u -2.6666666666666665))))) (log PI))
   (-
    (log s)
    (* 0.25 (/ s (+ (* -0.25 (* u PI)) (* PI (+ 0.25 (* u -0.25))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (((u * (2.0f + (u * (2.0f - (u * -2.6666666666666665f))))) - logf(((float) M_PI))) + (logf(s) - (0.25f * (s / ((-0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) + (((float) M_PI) * (0.25f + (u * -0.25f))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(u * Float32(Float32(2.0) - Float32(u * Float32(-2.6666666666666665)))))) - log(Float32(pi))) + Float32(log(s) - Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(s / Float32(Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.25))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (((u * (single(2.0) + (u * (single(2.0) - (u * single(-2.6666666666666665)))))) - log(single(pi))) + (log(s) - (single(0.25) * (s / ((single(-0.25) * (u * single(pi))) + (single(pi) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.25)))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot \left(2 + u \cdot \left(2 - u \cdot -2.6666666666666665\right)\right) - \log \pi\right) + \left(\log s - 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
    2. +-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
    3. associate-*r/24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}} + 1\right) \]
    4. fma-define24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  6. Simplified24.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 24.6%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)\right)\right) + \left(-1 \cdot \log s + 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)}\right)\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in u around 0 24.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\log \pi + u \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(-2.6666666666666665 \cdot u - 2\right) - 2\right)\right)} + \left(-1 \cdot \log s + 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)}\right)\right) \]
  9. Final simplification24.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot \left(2 + u \cdot \left(2 - u \cdot -2.6666666666666665\right)\right) - \log \pi\right) + \left(\log s - 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)\right) \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 25.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\left(\log s - 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) - \log \pi\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (-
    (log s)
    (* 0.25 (/ s (+ (* -0.25 (* u PI)) (* PI (+ 0.25 (* u -0.25)))))))
   (log PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * ((logf(s) - (0.25f * (s / ((-0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) + (((float) M_PI) * (0.25f + (u * -0.25f))))))) - logf(((float) M_PI)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(log(s) - Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(s / Float32(Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)))))))) - log(Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * ((log(s) - (single(0.25) * (s / ((single(-0.25) * (u * single(pi))) + (single(pi) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.25)))))))) - log(single(pi)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\left(\log s - 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) - \log \pi\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
    2. +-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
    3. associate-*r/24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}} + 1\right) \]
    4. fma-define24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  6. Simplified24.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 24.6%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)\right)\right) + \left(-1 \cdot \log s + 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)}\right)\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in u around 0 24.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\log \pi} + \left(-1 \cdot \log s + 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)}\right)\right) \]
  9. Final simplification24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\left(\log s - 0.25 \cdot \frac{s}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) - \log \pi\right) \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 25.1% accurate, 3.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (- (/ (* 2.0 (* u PI)) (+ 1.0 (/ PI s))) (* s (log1p (/ PI s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return ((2.0f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) / (1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s))) - (s * log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s))) - Float32(s * log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
    2. +-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
    3. associate-*r/24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}} + 1\right) \]
    4. fma-define24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  6. Simplified24.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 24.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative24.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    2. mul-1-neg24.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + \color{blue}{\left(-s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    3. unsub-neg24.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/24.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative24.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 2}}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. *-commutative24.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot 2}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    7. log1p-define24.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 2}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Simplified24.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 2}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification24.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 25.1% accurate, 4.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log1p (/ PI s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
    2. +-commutative24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
    3. associate-*r/24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}} + 1\right) \]
    4. fma-define24.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  6. Simplified24.5%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 24.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*24.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-124.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    3. log1p-define24.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Simplified24.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 11.4% accurate, 61.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2\right) - \pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- (* PI (* u 2.0)) PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (((float) M_PI) * (u * 2.0f)) - ((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(u * Float32(2.0))) - Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = (single(pi) * (u * single(2.0))) - single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2\right) - \pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. *-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    9. *-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\pi\right)} + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \]
    2. +-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-\pi\right)} \]
    3. associate-*r*11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + \left(-\pi\right) \]
    4. fma-define11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot u, \pi, -\pi\right)} \]
  9. Simplified11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot u, \pi, -\pi\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fmm-undef11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \pi} \]
    2. *-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 2\right)} \cdot \pi - \pi \]
  11. Applied egg-rr11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 2\right) \cdot \pi - \pi} \]
  12. Final simplification11.4%

    \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2\right) - \pi \]
  13. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 11.4% accurate, 61.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* PI (+ -1.0 (* u 2.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return ((float) M_PI) * (-1.0f + (u * 2.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(pi) * (single(-1.0) + (u * single(2.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. *-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    9. *-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*11.4%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\pi\right)} + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \]
    2. +-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-\pi\right)} \]
    3. associate-*r*11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + \left(-\pi\right) \]
    4. fma-define11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot u, \pi, -\pi\right)} \]
  9. Simplified11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot u, \pi, -\pi\right)} \]
  10. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-\pi\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + \left(-\pi\right) \]
    3. *-commutative11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 2\right)} \cdot \pi + \left(-\pi\right) \]
    4. neg-mul-111.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot 2\right) \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out11.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2 + -1\right)} \]
  12. Simplified11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2 + -1\right)} \]
  13. Final simplification11.4%

    \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \]
  14. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 11.2% accurate, 72.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)}{s} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (/ (* s (- PI)) s))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (s * -((float) M_PI)) / s;
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(s * Float32(-Float32(pi))) / s)
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = (s * -single(pi)) / s;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)}{s}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/11.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-s\right) \cdot \pi}{s}} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr11.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-s\right) \cdot \pi}{s}} \]
  7. Final simplification11.1%

    \[\leadsto \frac{s \cdot \left(-\pi\right)}{s} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 11.2% accurate, 216.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified11.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024151 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))