Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 14.6s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5d0) * log(c))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * Math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * Math.log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((((x * math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * math.log(c))) + (y * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + Float64(Float64(b - 0.5) * log(c))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5d0) * log(c))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * Math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * Math.log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((((x * math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * math.log(c))) + (y * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + Float64(Float64(b - 0.5) * log(c))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y i (fma (+ b -0.5) (log c) (+ z (fma x (log y) (+ t a))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(y, i, fma((b + -0.5), log(c), (z + fma(x, log(y), (t + a)))));
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(y, i, fma(Float64(b + -0.5), log(c), Float64(z + fma(x, log(y), Float64(t + a)))))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(y * i + N[(N[(b + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   4. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(t + a\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

   9. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

   10. fma-define 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

   11. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   12. fma-define 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 77.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(z + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+188}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right) + -0.5 \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + t\_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))
   (if (<= t_1 -1e+159)
     (+ (* y i) (+ z (* b (log c))))
     (if (<= t_1 5e+188)
       (+ (* y i) (+ (+ a (+ z t)) (* -0.5 (log c))))
       (+ (* y i) (+ a t_1))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+159) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)));
	} else if (t_1 <= 5e+188) {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (-0.5 * log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)
    if (t_1 <= (-1d+159)) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)))
    else if (t_1 <= 5d+188) then
        tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + ((-0.5d0) * log(c)))
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+159) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * Math.log(c)));
	} else if (t_1 <= 5e+188) {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (-0.5 * Math.log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -1e+159:
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * math.log(c)))
	elif t_1 <= 5e+188:
		tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (-0.5 * math.log(c)))
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -1e+159)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(z + Float64(b * log(c))));
	elseif (t_1 <= 5e+188)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(a + Float64(z + t)) + Float64(-0.5 * log(c))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(a + t_1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -1e+159)
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)));
	elseif (t_1 <= 5e+188)
		tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (-0.5 * log(c)));
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + t_1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e+159], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e+188], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-0.5 * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) (log.f64 c)) < -9.9999999999999993e158

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

      2. pow3 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   8. Simplified 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   if -9.9999999999999993e158 < (*.f64 (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) (log.f64 c)) < 5.0000000000000001e188

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   if 5.0000000000000001e188 < (*.f64 (-.f64 b #s(literal 1/2 binary64)) (log.f64 c))

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

      2. pow3 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(z + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+188}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right) + -0.5 \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 90.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(i \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right) + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= i -3.5e-6) (not (<= i 6e+71)))
   (+ (* y i) (+ (+ a (+ z t)) (* b (log c))))
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (+ (* x (log y)) (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((i <= -3.5e-6) || !(i <= 6e+71)) {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((x * log(y)) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((i <= (-3.5d-6)) .or. (.not. (i <= 6d+71))) then
        tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * log(c)))
    else
        tmp = a + (t + (z + ((x * log(y)) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((i <= -3.5e-6) || !(i <= 6e+71)) {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * Math.log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((x * Math.log(y)) + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (i <= -3.5e-6) or not (i <= 6e+71):
		tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * math.log(c)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((x * math.log(y)) + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((i <= -3.5e-6) || !(i <= 6e+71))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(a + Float64(z + t)) + Float64(b * log(c))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((i <= -3.5e-6) || ~((i <= 6e+71)))
		tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * log(c)));
	else
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((x * log(y)) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[i, -3.5e-6], N[Not[LessEqual[i, 6e+71]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if i < -3.49999999999999995e-6 or 6.00000000000000025e71 < i

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   if -3.49999999999999995e-6 < i < 6.00000000000000025e71

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(t + a\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(i \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right) + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \left(\left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right) + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y))))) (* (log c) (- b 0.5))) (* y i)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return ((a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))))) + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))) + (y * i);
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return ((a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))) + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))) + (y * i)

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y))))) + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (log(c) * (b - 0.5))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right) + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right) + y \cdot i \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 60.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -2020000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + b \cdot \log c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7e+127)
   (+ z (* y i))
   (if (<= z -2020000000000.0) (+ (* y i) (* b (log c))) (+ a (* y i)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7e+127) {
		tmp = z + (y * i);
	} else if (z <= -2020000000000.0) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (b * log(c));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-7d+127)) then
        tmp = z + (y * i)
    else if (z <= (-2020000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (b * log(c))
    else
        tmp = a + (y * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7e+127) {
		tmp = z + (y * i);
	} else if (z <= -2020000000000.0) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (b * Math.log(c));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7e+127:
		tmp = z + (y * i)
	elif z <= -2020000000000.0:
		tmp = (y * i) + (b * math.log(c))
	else:
		tmp = a + (y * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7e+127)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * i));
	elseif (z <= -2020000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(b * log(c)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(y * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -7e+127)
		tmp = z + (y * i);
	elseif (z <= -2020000000000.0)
		tmp = (y * i) + (b * log(c));
	else
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7e+127], N[(z + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -2020000000000.0], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -6.99999999999999956e127

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-expm1-u 61.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(-0.5 \cdot \log c\right)\right)}\right) + y \cdot i \]

      2. expm1-undefine 61.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \log c} - 1}\right)\right) + y \cdot i \]

      3. *-commutative 61.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log c \cdot -0.5}} - 1\right)\right) + y \cdot i \]

      4. exp-to-pow 61.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{c}^{-0.5}} - 1\right)\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left({c}^{-0.5} - 1\right)}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + y \cdot i \]

   if -6.99999999999999956e127 < z < -2.02e12

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c} + y \cdot i \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b} + y \cdot i \]

   6. Simplified 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b} + y \cdot i \]

   if -2.02e12 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -2020000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + b \cdot \log c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 77.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+134}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(z + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.25e+134)
   (+ (* y i) (+ z (* b (log c))))
   (+ (* y i) (+ a (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.25e+134) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.25d+134)) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)))
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + (a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.25e+134) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * Math.log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.25e+134:
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * math.log(c)))
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.25e+134)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(z + Float64(b * log(c))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(a + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.25e+134)
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)));
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + (a + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.25e+134], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.24999999999999995e134

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

      2. pow3 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   8. Simplified 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   if -1.24999999999999995e134 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

      2. pow3 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{+134}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(z + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(a + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 72.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(z + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 5.5e+139)
   (+ (* y i) (+ z (* b (log c))))
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (* (+ b -0.5) (log c)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 5.5e+139) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((b + -0.5) * log(c))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= 5.5d+139) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)))
    else
        tmp = a + (t + (z + ((b + (-0.5d0)) * log(c))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 5.5e+139) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * Math.log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((b + -0.5) * Math.log(c))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 5.5e+139:
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * math.log(c)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((b + -0.5) * math.log(c))))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 5.5e+139)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(z + Float64(b * log(c))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(b + -0.5) * log(c)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= 5.5e+139)
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)));
	else
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((b + -0.5) * log(c))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 5.5e+139], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[(b + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 5.4999999999999996e139

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

      2. pow3 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   8. Simplified 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   if 5.4999999999999996e139 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(i + \left(\frac{a}{y} + \left(\frac{t}{y} + \left(\frac{z}{y} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{y}\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 59.9%

         \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c}\right)\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 59.9%

         \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \log c\right)\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 59.9%

         \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) \cdot \log c\right)\right) \]

      4. +-commutative 59.9%

         \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 + b\right)} \cdot \log c\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 59.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(-0.5 + b\right) \cdot \log c\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(z + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(b + -0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 83.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* y i) (+ (* (log c) (- b 0.5)) (+ a (+ z t)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)) + (a + (z + t)))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (y * i) + ((math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)) + Float64(a + Float64(z + t))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

4. Final simplification 86.5%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right) \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 71.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{+137}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(z + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 3.4e+137) (+ (* y i) (+ z (* b (log c)))) (+ a (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 3.4e+137) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= 3.4d+137) then
        tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)))
    else
        tmp = a + (y * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 3.4e+137) {
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * Math.log(c)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 3.4e+137:
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * math.log(c)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (y * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 3.4e+137)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(z + Float64(b * log(c))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(y * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= 3.4e+137)
		tmp = (y * i) + (z + (b * log(c)));
	else
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 3.4e+137], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 3.39999999999999986e137

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\log y \cdot \log y\right) \cdot \log y}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

      2. pow3 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\log y}^{3}}} + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   8. Simplified 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   if 3.39999999999999986e137 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{+137}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(z + b \cdot \log c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 82.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right) + b \cdot \log c\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* y i) (+ (+ a (+ z t)) (* b (log c)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * log(c)));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * log(c)))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * Math.log(c)));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * math.log(c)))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(a + Float64(z + t)) + Float64(b * log(c))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (z + t)) + (b * log(c)));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 86.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

6. Simplified 86.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

7. Final simplification 86.0%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right) + b \cdot \log c\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 39.3% accurate, 16.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.55e+176) z (if (<= z -3.6e-38) (* y i) a)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.55e+176) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= -3.6e-38) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.55d+176)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= (-3.6d-38)) then
        tmp = y * i
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.55e+176) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= -3.6e-38) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.55e+176:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= -3.6e-38:
		tmp = y * i
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.55e+176)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= -3.6e-38)
		tmp = Float64(y * i);
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.55e+176)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= -3.6e-38)
		tmp = y * i;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.55e+176], z, If[LessEqual[z, -3.6e-38], N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision], a]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.55e176

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(t + a\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -1.55e176 < z < -3.6000000000000001e-38

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(t + a\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 42.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   7. Simplified 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   if -3.6000000000000001e-38 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(t + a\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 18.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 59.9% accurate, 21.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -6.4e+44) (+ z (* y i)) (+ a (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.4e+44) {
		tmp = z + (y * i);
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-6.4d+44)) then
        tmp = z + (y * i)
    else
        tmp = a + (y * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.4e+44) {
		tmp = z + (y * i);
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -6.4e+44:
		tmp = z + (y * i)
	else:
		tmp = a + (y * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -6.4e+44)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(y * i));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(y * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -6.4e+44)
		tmp = z + (y * i);
	else
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -6.4e+44], N[(z + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.40000000000000009e44

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 76.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-expm1-u 56.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(-0.5 \cdot \log c\right)\right)}\right) + y \cdot i \]

      2. expm1-undefine 56.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{-0.5 \cdot \log c} - 1}\right)\right) + y \cdot i \]

      3. *-commutative 56.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{\color{blue}{\log c \cdot -0.5}} - 1\right)\right) + y \cdot i \]

      4. exp-to-pow 56.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{c}^{-0.5}} - 1\right)\right) + y \cdot i \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left({c}^{-0.5} - 1\right)}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 58.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} + y \cdot i \]

   if -6.40000000000000009e44 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 54.7% accurate, 21.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.45 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + y \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.45e+176) z (+ a (* y i))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.45e+176) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.45d+176)) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = a + (y * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.45e+176) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.45e+176:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = a + (y * i)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.45e+176)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(y * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.45e+176)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = a + (y * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.45e+176], z, N[(a + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.45e176

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(t + a\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -2.45e176 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right)} + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 70.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 42.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 38.9% accurate, 36.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+102}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (if (<= z -3.8e+102) z a))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.8e+102) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.8d+102)) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.8e+102) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.8e+102:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.8e+102)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.8e+102)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.8e+102], z, a]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.79999999999999979e102

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(t + a\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 43.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -3.79999999999999979e102 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(t + a\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 17.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 22.3% accurate, 219.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 a)

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return a
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + \left(t + a\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(t + a\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   4. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \left(t + a\right)\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(a + t\right)}\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

   9. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

   10. fma-define 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

   11. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   12. fma-define 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 15.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024151 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))