Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 7.8s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 70.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-187} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+139}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -9.5e-187) (not (<= y 1.45e+139))) (* (* x 3.0) y) (- z)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9.5e-187) || !(y <= 1.45e+139)) {
		tmp = (x * 3.0) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-9.5d-187)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.45d+139))) then
        tmp = (x * 3.0d0) * y
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -9.5e-187) || !(y <= 1.45e+139)) {
		tmp = (x * 3.0) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -9.5e-187) or not (y <= 1.45e+139):
		tmp = (x * 3.0) * y
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -9.5e-187) || !(y <= 1.45e+139))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -9.5e-187) || ~((y <= 1.45e+139)))
		tmp = (x * 3.0) * y;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -9.5e-187], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.45e+139]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -9.49999999999999936e-187 or 1.4499999999999999e139 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + 3 \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot x + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(3, x, -1 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 97.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(3, x, \color{blue}{-\frac{z}{y}}\right) \]

      4. fmm-def 97.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot x - \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(3 \cdot x - \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.3%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -9.49999999999999936e-187 < y < 1.4499999999999999e139

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 69.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   7. Simplified 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-187} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+139}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 70.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-177} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+139}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.4e-177) (not (<= y 1.45e+139))) (* 3.0 (* x y)) (- z)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.4e-177) || !(y <= 1.45e+139)) {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.4d-177)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.45d+139))) then
        tmp = 3.0d0 * (x * y)
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.4e-177) || !(y <= 1.45e+139)) {
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.4e-177) or not (y <= 1.45e+139):
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.4e-177) || !(y <= 1.45e+139))
		tmp = Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.4e-177) || ~((y <= 1.45e+139)))
		tmp = 3.0 * (x * y);
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.4e-177], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.45e+139]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.39999999999999993e-177 or 1.4499999999999999e139 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -1.39999999999999993e-177 < y < 1.4499999999999999e139

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 69.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   7. Simplified 69.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-177} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+139}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* 3.0 (* x y)) z))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (3.0d0 * (x * y)) - z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return (3.0 * (x * y)) - z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(3.0 * Float64(x * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (3.0 * (x * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(3.0 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} - z \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 51.7% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

7. Simplified 50.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 2.2% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

7. Simplified 50.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-sub0 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - z} \]

   2. sub-neg 50.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-z\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 25.3%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-z} \cdot \sqrt{-z}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 14.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}} \]

   5. sqr-neg 14.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 1.3%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.3%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{z} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 2.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + z} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. +-lft-identity 2.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

11. Simplified 2.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (3.0d0 * y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024150 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (* x (* 3 y)) z))

  (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))