Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 14.8s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ 1.0 (/ s PI)))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((1.0f / (s / ((float) M_PI)))))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(s / Float32(pi)))))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(1.0) / (s / single(pi)))))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. inv-pow99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow-199.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 24.8% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (fma 4.0 (/ (+ (* PI (+ (* u -0.25) 0.25)) (* u (* PI -0.25))) s) 1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(fmaf(4.0f, (((((float) M_PI) * ((u * -0.25f) + 0.25f)) + (u * (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f))) / s), 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(fma(Float32(4.0), Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(0.25))) + Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))) / s), Float32(1.0))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/24.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
    2. +-commutative24.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
    3. associate-*r/24.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}} + 1\right) \]
    4. fma-define24.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  6. Simplified24.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot u}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification24.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 24.8% accurate, 3.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    1.0
    (* 4.0 (/ (- (* -0.25 (* u PI)) (+ (* PI -0.25) (* 0.25 (* u PI)))) s))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((1.0f + (4.0f * (((-0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) - ((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f) + (0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))))) / s))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) - Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))))) / s)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(1.0) + (single(4.0) * (((single(-0.25) * (u * single(pi))) - ((single(pi) * single(-0.25)) + (single(0.25) * (u * single(pi))))) / s))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification24.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 14.2% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{{s}^{2}}{s} \cdot \left(\frac{\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5}{s} \cdot \left(--4\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (/ (pow s 2.0) s) (* (/ (+ (* PI -0.25) (* (* u PI) 0.5)) s) (- -4.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (powf(s, 2.0f) / s) * ((((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f) + ((u * ((float) M_PI)) * 0.5f)) / s) * -(-4.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32((s ^ Float32(2.0)) / s) * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(0.5))) / s) * Float32(-Float32(-4.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = ((s ^ single(2.0)) / s) * ((((single(pi) * single(-0.25)) + ((u * single(pi)) * single(0.5))) / s) * -single(-4.0));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{{s}^{2}}{s} \cdot \left(\frac{\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5}{s} \cdot \left(--4\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}\right) \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}\right) \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    7. *-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}}{s}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub010.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - s\right)} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    2. flip--13.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0 \cdot 0 - s \cdot s}{0 + s}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval13.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{0} - s \cdot s}{0 + s} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    4. pow213.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - \color{blue}{{s}^{2}}}{0 + s} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    5. add-sqr-sqrt13.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    6. sqrt-unprod7.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{s \cdot s}}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    7. sqr-neg7.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)}}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    8. sqrt-unprod-0.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-s} \cdot \sqrt{-s}}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    9. add-sqr-sqrt8.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{0 + \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    10. sub-neg8.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{\color{blue}{0 - s}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    11. neg-sub08.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{\color{blue}{-s}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    12. add-sqr-sqrt-0.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{-s} \cdot \sqrt{-s}}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    13. sqrt-unprod7.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)}}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    14. sqr-neg7.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{\sqrt{\color{blue}{s \cdot s}}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    15. sqrt-unprod13.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    16. add-sqr-sqrt13.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{\color{blue}{s}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr13.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{0 - {s}^{2}}{s}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub0-neg13.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-{s}^{2}}}{s} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
  10. Simplified13.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-{s}^{2}}{s}} \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
  11. Final simplification13.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{{s}^{2}}{s} \cdot \left(\frac{\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5}{s} \cdot \left(--4\right)\right) \]
  12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 11.7% accurate, 25.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* 4.0 (- (* 0.25 (* u PI)) (+ (* -0.25 (* u PI)) (* PI 0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * ((0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) - ((-0.25f * (u * ((float) M_PI))) + (((float) M_PI) * 0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) - Float32(Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(u * Float32(pi))) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * ((single(0.25) * (u * single(pi))) - ((single(-0.25) * (u * single(pi))) + (single(pi) * single(0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification10.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 11.7% accurate, 28.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \cdot -4 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (+ (* PI (+ (* u -0.25) 0.25)) (* u (* PI -0.25))) -4.0))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return ((((float) M_PI) * ((u * -0.25f) + 0.25f)) + (u * (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f))) * -4.0f;
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(0.25))) + Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))) * Float32(-4.0))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = ((single(pi) * ((u * single(-0.25)) + single(0.25))) + (u * (single(pi) * single(-0.25)))) * single(-4.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \cdot -4
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    5. associate-*r*10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. *-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}\right) \]
    9. associate-*r*10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot u}\right) \]
    10. *-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \cdot u\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot u\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification10.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \cdot -4 \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 14.2% accurate, 39.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 5.000000229068525 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot \frac{\pi}{-s}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= s 5.000000229068525e-19) 0.0 (* s (/ PI (- s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float tmp;
	if (s <= 5.000000229068525e-19f) {
		tmp = 0.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = s * (((float) M_PI) / -s);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(u, s)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (s <= Float32(5.000000229068525e-19))
		tmp = Float32(0.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(s * Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (s <= single(5.000000229068525e-19))
		tmp = single(0.0);
	else
		tmp = s * (single(pi) / -s);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;s \leq 5.000000229068525 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;s \cdot \frac{\pi}{-s}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if s < 5.00000023e-19

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Simplified99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 13.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{1} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in s around 0 13.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]

    if 5.00000023e-19 < s

    1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Simplified99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 15.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification13.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 5.000000229068525 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;s \cdot \frac{\pi}{-s}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 14.2% accurate, 61.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;s \leq 5.000000229068525 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\pi\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (if (<= s 5.000000229068525e-19) 0.0 (- PI)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float tmp;
	if (s <= 5.000000229068525e-19f) {
		tmp = 0.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = -((float) M_PI);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(u, s)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (s <= Float32(5.000000229068525e-19))
		tmp = Float32(0.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(-Float32(pi));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (s <= single(5.000000229068525e-19))
		tmp = single(0.0);
	else
		tmp = -single(pi);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;s \leq 5.000000229068525 \cdot 10^{-19}:\\
\;\;\;\;0\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-\pi\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if s < 5.00000023e-19

    1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Simplified99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 13.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{1} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in s around 0 13.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]

    if 5.00000023e-19 < s

    1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Simplified99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing
    4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 15.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. neg-mul-115.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
    6. Simplified15.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 11.7% accurate, 61.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* PI (+ -1.0 (* u 2.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return ((float) M_PI) * (-1.0f + (u * 2.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(pi) * (single(-1.0) + (u * single(2.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}\right) \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}\right) \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    7. *-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}}{s}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \frac{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25}{s}\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-110.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\pi\right)} + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \]
    2. +-commutative10.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-\pi\right)} \]
    3. associate-*r*10.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + \left(-\pi\right) \]
    4. neg-mul-110.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out10.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(2 \cdot u + -1\right)} \]
  9. Simplified10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(2 \cdot u + -1\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification10.9%

    \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 10.4% accurate, 433.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 0.0)
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 0.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = 0.0e0
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(0.0)
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(0.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{1} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around 0 10.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024150 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))