Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 29.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma (fma x y z) y t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y + z), $MachinePrecision] * y + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot y + z, y, t\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right)}, y, t\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 64.1% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -250:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-81}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (* y y))))
   (if (<= y -250.0)
     t_1
     (if (<= y -1.1e-81) (* y z) (if (<= y 6e-11) t t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * (y * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -250.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= -1.1e-81) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 6e-11) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * (y * y)
    if (y <= (-250.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= (-1.1d-81)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (y <= 6d-11) then
        tmp = t
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * (y * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -250.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= -1.1e-81) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 6e-11) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x * (y * y)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -250.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= -1.1e-81:
		tmp = y * z
	elif y <= 6e-11:
		tmp = t
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x * Float64(y * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -250.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= -1.1e-81)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (y <= 6e-11)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x * (y * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -250.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= -1.1e-81)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (y <= 6e-11)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -250.0], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, -1.1e-81], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 6e-11], t, t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -250 or 6e-11 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot z}{x} + {y}^{2}\right)} + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{2} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      2. unpow2 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot y} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right) + t \]

      3. associate-/l* 81.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right) + t \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 86.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   5. Simplified 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 66.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{y}\right) \]

   if -250 < y < -1.1e-81

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot z}{x} + {y}^{2}\right)} + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{2} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      2. unpow2 91.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot y} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right) + t \]

      3. associate-/l* 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right) + t \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 90.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   5. Simplified 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.1e-81 < y < 6e-11

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3400000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.75 \cdot 10^{-31}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -3400000.0) (not (<= y 2.75e-31)))
   (* y (+ z (* x y)))
   (+ t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3400000.0) || !(y <= 2.75e-31)) {
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-3400000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.75d-31))) then
        tmp = y * (z + (x * y))
    else
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -3400000.0) || !(y <= 2.75e-31)) {
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -3400000.0) or not (y <= 2.75e-31):
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y))
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -3400000.0) || !(y <= 2.75e-31))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(x * y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -3400000.0) || ~((y <= 2.75e-31)))
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	else
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -3400000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.75e-31]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.4e6 or 2.74999999999999979e-31 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot z}{x} + {y}^{2}\right)} + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{2} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      2. unpow2 78.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot y} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right) + t \]

      3. associate-/l* 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right) + t \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 87.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   5. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -3.4e6 < y < 2.74999999999999979e-31

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3400000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.75 \cdot 10^{-31}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 27500000:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.16e+63)
   (+ t (* y z))
   (if (<= z 27500000.0) (+ t (* y (* x y))) (* y (+ z (* x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.16e+63) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else if (z <= 27500000.0) {
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.16d+63)) then
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    else if (z <= 27500000.0d0) then
        tmp = t + (y * (x * y))
    else
        tmp = y * (z + (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.16e+63) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else if (z <= 27500000.0) {
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.16e+63:
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	elif z <= 27500000.0:
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y))
	else:
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.16e+63)
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	elseif (z <= 27500000.0)
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(x * y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.16e+63)
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	elseif (z <= 27500000.0)
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	else
		tmp = y * (z + (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.16e+63], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 27500000.0], N[(t + N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.15999999999999994e63

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]

   if -1.15999999999999994e63 < z < 2.75e7

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \cdot y + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y + t \]

   5. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y + t \]

   if 2.75e7 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot z}{x} + {y}^{2}\right)} + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 62.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{2} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      2. unpow2 62.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot y} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right) + t \]

      3. associate-/l* 66.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right) + t \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 72.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   5. Simplified 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 59.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 27500000:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 79.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.6e+23) (not (<= y 1.3e+71))) (* x (* y y)) (+ t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.6e+23) || !(y <= 1.3e+71)) {
		tmp = x * (y * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.6d+23)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.3d+71))) then
        tmp = x * (y * y)
    else
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.6e+23) || !(y <= 1.3e+71)) {
		tmp = x * (y * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.6e+23) or not (y <= 1.3e+71):
		tmp = x * (y * y)
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.6e+23) || !(y <= 1.3e+71))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.6e+23) || ~((y <= 1.3e+71)))
		tmp = x * (y * y);
	else
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.6e+23], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.3e+71]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.59999999999999992e23 or 1.29999999999999996e71 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot z}{x} + {y}^{2}\right)} + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{2} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      2. unpow2 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot y} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right) + t \]

      3. associate-/l* 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right) + t \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   5. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 79.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 69.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{y}\right) \]

   if -2.59999999999999992e23 < y < 1.29999999999999996e71

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+71}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 50.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+38} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1100000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.6e+38) (not (<= z 1100000000000.0))) (* y z) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.6e+38) || !(z <= 1100000000000.0)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.6d+38)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1100000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.6e+38) || !(z <= 1100000000000.0)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.6e+38) or not (z <= 1100000000000.0):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.6e+38) || !(z <= 1100000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.6e+38) || ~((z <= 1100000000000.0)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.6e+38], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1100000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], t]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.5999999999999999e38 or 1.1e12 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot z}{x} + {y}^{2}\right)} + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 73.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{2} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      2. unpow2 73.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot y} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right) + t \]

      3. associate-/l* 72.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right) + t \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 77.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   5. Simplified 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.5999999999999999e38 < z < 1.1e12

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 42.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+38} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1100000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (* y (+ z (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + (y * (z + (x * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(x * y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(y * N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto t + y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 38.4% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 32.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024150 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))