Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.4s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (y * x)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(y * x)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (y * x)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* x y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x / 2.0d0) + (x * y)) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 2.0) + Float64(x * y)) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x / 2.0) + (x * y)) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{2} + x \cdot y\right) + z \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ z (* x y))))
   (if (<= y -0.5) t_0 (if (<= y 0.5) (+ z (* x 0.5)) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -0.5) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.5) {
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = z + (x * y)
    if (y <= (-0.5d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 0.5d0) then
        tmp = z + (x * 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -0.5) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.5) {
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = z + (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -0.5:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 0.5:
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(z + Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -0.5)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.5)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = z + (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -0.5)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.5)
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -0.5], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 0.5], N[(z + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -0.5 or 0.5 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)}, z\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, y\right), z\right) \]

   5. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   if -0.5 < y < 0.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot x\right)}, z\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\left(x \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right), z\right) \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \frac{1}{2}\right), z\right) \]

   5. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} + z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 83.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.45e+43)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= y 8.8e-10) (+ z (* x 0.5)) (* x (+ y 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.45e+43) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 8.8e-10) {
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.45d+43)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (y <= 8.8d-10) then
        tmp = z + (x * 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.45e+43) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 8.8e-10) {
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.45e+43:
		tmp = x * y
	elif y <= 8.8e-10:
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.45e+43)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (y <= 8.8e-10)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.45e+43)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (y <= 8.8e-10)
		tmp = z + (x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.45e+43], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 8.8e-10], N[(z + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.4500000000000001e43

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{y}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 78.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.4500000000000001e43 < y < 8.7999999999999996e-10

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot x\right)}, z\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\left(x \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right), z\right) \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \frac{1}{2}\right), z\right) \]

   5. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} + z \]

   if 8.7999999999999996e-10 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-lowering-+.f64 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\frac{1}{2}, \color{blue}{y}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+60}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+115}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7e+60) z (if (<= z 5.2e+115) (* x (+ y 0.5)) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7e+60) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 5.2e+115) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-7d+60)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 5.2d+115) then
        tmp = x * (y + 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7e+60) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 5.2e+115) {
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7e+60:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 5.2e+115:
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7e+60)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 5.2e+115)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 0.5));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -7e+60)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 5.2e+115)
		tmp = x * (y + 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7e+60], z, If[LessEqual[z, 5.2e+115], N[(x * N[(y + 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], z]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.0000000000000004e60 or 5.2000000000000001e115 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -7.0000000000000004e60 < z < 5.2000000000000001e115

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-lowering-+.f64 79.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\frac{1}{2}, \color{blue}{y}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7 \cdot 10^{+60}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+115}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 59.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6.8e+43) (* x y) (if (<= y 9e+61) z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e+43) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 9e+61) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-6.8d+43)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (y <= 9d+61) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e+43) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (y <= 9e+61) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -6.8e+43:
		tmp = x * y
	elif y <= 9e+61:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6.8e+43)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (y <= 9e+61)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -6.8e+43)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (y <= 9e+61)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6.8e+43], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 9e+61], z, N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.80000000000000024e43 or 9e61 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 79.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{y}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -6.80000000000000024e43 < y < 9e61

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 52.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.54:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.3 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -0.54) z (if (<= z 5.3e-40) (* x 0.5) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -0.54) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 5.3e-40) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-0.54d0)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= 5.3d-40) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -0.54) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= 5.3e-40) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -0.54:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= 5.3e-40:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -0.54)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 5.3e-40)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -0.54)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= 5.3e-40)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -0.54], z, If[LessEqual[z, 5.3e-40], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], z]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -0.54000000000000004 or 5.3000000000000002e-40 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Simplified 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -0.54000000000000004 < z < 5.3000000000000002e-40

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lowering-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} + y\right)}\right) \]

      2. +-lowering-+.f64 90.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \mathsf{+.f64}\left(\frac{1}{2}, \color{blue}{y}\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]

      2. *-lowering-*.f64 42.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{*.f64}\left(x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 42.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 41.8% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{x}{2} + y \cdot x\right) + z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Simplified 43.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024150 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Data.Histogram.Bin.BinF:$cfromIndex from histogram-fill-0.8.4.1"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (/ x 2.0) (* y x)) z))