SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 6.3s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (- z x) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (z - x), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(z - x), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right) + x} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.3% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-74}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 10^{+112}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (- y))))
   (if (<= y -9.2e-8)
     t_0
     (if (<= y 2.8e-74) x (if (<= y 1e+112) (* y z) t_0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -y;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -9.2e-8) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 2.8e-74) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 1e+112) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x * -y
    if (y <= (-9.2d-8)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 2.8d-74) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 1d+112) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -y;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -9.2e-8) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 2.8e-74) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 1e+112) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * -y
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -9.2e-8:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 2.8e-74:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 1e+112:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * Float64(-y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -9.2e-8)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 2.8e-74)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 1e+112)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * -y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -9.2e-8)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 2.8e-74)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 1e+112)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -9.2e-8], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 2.8e-74], x, If[LessEqual[y, 1e+112], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -9.2000000000000003e-8 or 9.9999999999999993e111 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 61.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 61.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 60.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 60.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 60.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \]

   if -9.2000000000000003e-8 < y < 2.79999999999999988e-74

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.79999999999999988e-74 < y < 9.9999999999999993e111

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 80.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \frac{x}{z}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 63.6%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-74}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 10^{+112}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.0) (not (<= y 1.0))) (* y (- z x)) (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * (z - x)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.0) or not (y <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * (z - x)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || ~((y <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(z + \frac{x}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z} - x\right) \]

   if -1 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-54}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -8e-8) (not (<= y 1.9e-54))) (* y (- z x)) (* x (- 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8e-8) || !(y <= 1.9e-54)) {
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-8d-8)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.9d-54))) then
        tmp = y * (z - x)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -8e-8) || !(y <= 1.9e-54)) {
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -8e-8) or not (y <= 1.9e-54):
		tmp = y * (z - x)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -8e-8) || !(y <= 1.9e-54))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -8e-8) || ~((y <= 1.9e-54)))
		tmp = y * (z - x);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -8e-8], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.9e-54]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -8.0000000000000002e-8 or 1.9000000000000001e-54 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(z + \frac{x}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.0%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z} - x\right) \]

   if -8.0000000000000002e-8 < y < 1.9000000000000001e-54

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 75.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 75.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-54}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -94000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 10^{+43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -94000.0) (not (<= z 1e+43))) (* y z) (* x (- 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -94000.0) || !(z <= 1e+43)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-94000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1d+43))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -94000.0) || !(z <= 1e+43)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -94000.0) or not (z <= 1e+43):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -94000.0) || !(z <= 1e+43))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -94000.0) || ~((z <= 1e+43)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -94000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1e+43]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -94000 or 1.00000000000000001e43 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 93.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \frac{x}{z}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 71.3%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -94000 < z < 1.00000000000000001e43

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 89.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 89.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -94000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 10^{+43}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -7.8e-8) (not (<= y 2.8e-74))) (* y z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7.8e-8) || !(y <= 2.8e-74)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-7.8d-8)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.8d-74))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7.8e-8) || !(y <= 2.8e-74)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -7.8e-8) or not (y <= 2.8e-74):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -7.8e-8) || !(y <= 2.8e-74))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -7.8e-8) || ~((y <= 2.8e-74)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -7.8e-8], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.8e-74]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -7.7999999999999997e-8 or 2.79999999999999988e-74 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 56.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 56.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \frac{x}{z}\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 51.0%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -7.7999999999999997e-8 < y < 2.79999999999999988e-74

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 36.3% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 36.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024148 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (- z x))))