math.square on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 93.6% → 100.0%

Time: 5.4s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• 43.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ re \cdot re - im \cdot im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore re_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (- (* re re) (* im im)))

C

double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re * re) - (im * im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function re_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    re_sqr = (re * re) - (im * im)
end function

Java

public static double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re * re) - (im * im);
}

Python

def re_sqr(re, im):
	return (re * re) - (im * im)

Julia

function re_sqr(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(re * re) - Float64(im * im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = re_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = (re * re) - (im * im);
end

Wolfram

re$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] - N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ re \cdot re - im \cdot im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore re_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (- (* re re) (* im im)))

C

double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re * re) - (im * im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function re_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    re_sqr = (re * re) - (im * im)
end function

Java

public static double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re * re) - (im * im);
}

Python

def re_sqr(re, im):
	return (re * re) - (im * im)

Julia

function re_sqr(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(re * re) - Float64(im * im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = re_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = (re * re) - (im * im);
end

Wolfram

re$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision] - N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(re - im\right) \cdot \left(re + im\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore re_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (* (- re im) (+ re im)))

C

double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re - im) * (re + im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function re_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    re_sqr = (re - im) * (re + im)
end function

Java

public static double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return (re - im) * (re + im);
}

Python

def re_sqr(re, im):
	return (re - im) * (re + im)

Julia

function re_sqr(re, im)
	return Float64(Float64(re - im) * Float64(re + im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = re_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = (re - im) * (re + im);
end

Wolfram

re$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(N[(re - im), $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[re \cdot re - im \cdot im \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. difference-of-squares 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re - im\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \left(-im\right)\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 51.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-im} \cdot \sqrt{-im}}\right) \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-im\right) \cdot \left(-im\right)}}\right) \]

   5. sqr-neg 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}\right) \]

   6. sqrt-prod 24.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{im} \cdot \sqrt{im}}\right) \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 53.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{im}\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 53.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + im\right)} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re - im\right)} \cdot \left(re + im\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 77.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \cdot re \leq 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(re - im\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;re \cdot re\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore re_sqr (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* re re) 1e+95) (* im (- re im)) (* re re)))

C

double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re * re) <= 1e+95) {
		tmp = im * (re - im);
	} else {
		tmp = re * re;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function re_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re * re) <= 1d+95) then
        tmp = im * (re - im)
    else
        tmp = re * re
    end if
    re_sqr = tmp
end function

Java

public static double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re * re) <= 1e+95) {
		tmp = im * (re - im);
	} else {
		tmp = re * re;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def re_sqr(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re * re) <= 1e+95:
		tmp = im * (re - im)
	else:
		tmp = re * re
	return tmp

Julia

function re_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(re * re) <= 1e+95)
		tmp = Float64(im * Float64(re - im));
	else
		tmp = Float64(re * re);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = re_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re * re) <= 1e+95)
		tmp = im * (re - im);
	else
		tmp = re * re;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

re$95$sqr[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision], 1e+95], N[(im * N[(re - im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 re re) < 1.00000000000000002e95

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[re \cdot re - im \cdot im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. difference-of-squares 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re - im\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \left(-im\right)\right)} \]

      3. add-sqr-sqrt 50.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-im} \cdot \sqrt{-im}}\right) \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 65.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-im\right) \cdot \left(-im\right)}}\right) \]

      5. sqr-neg 65.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}\right) \]

      6. sqrt-prod 15.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{im} \cdot \sqrt{im}}\right) \]

      7. add-sqr-sqrt 32.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{im}\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + im\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re - im\right)} \cdot \left(re + im\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in re around 0 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(re - im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   if 1.00000000000000002e95 < (*.f64 re re)

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[re \cdot re - im \cdot im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. difference-of-squares 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re - im\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \left(-im\right)\right)} \]

      3. add-sqr-sqrt 54.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-im} \cdot \sqrt{-im}}\right) \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 88.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-im\right) \cdot \left(-im\right)}}\right) \]

      5. sqr-neg 88.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}\right) \]

      6. sqrt-prod 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{im} \cdot \sqrt{im}}\right) \]

      7. add-sqr-sqrt 81.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{im}\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + im\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in re around inf 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{re} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in re around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re} \cdot re \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \cdot re \leq 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(re - im\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;re \cdot re\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 77.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \cdot re \leq 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(-im\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;re \cdot re\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore re_sqr (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* re re) 1e+95) (* im (- im)) (* re re)))

C

double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re * re) <= 1e+95) {
		tmp = im * -im;
	} else {
		tmp = re * re;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function re_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re * re) <= 1d+95) then
        tmp = im * -im
    else
        tmp = re * re
    end if
    re_sqr = tmp
end function

Java

public static double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re * re) <= 1e+95) {
		tmp = im * -im;
	} else {
		tmp = re * re;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def re_sqr(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re * re) <= 1e+95:
		tmp = im * -im
	else:
		tmp = re * re
	return tmp

Julia

function re_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(re * re) <= 1e+95)
		tmp = Float64(im * Float64(-im));
	else
		tmp = Float64(re * re);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = re_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re * re) <= 1e+95)
		tmp = im * -im;
	else
		tmp = re * re;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

re$95$sqr[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision], 1e+95], N[(im * (-im)), $MachinePrecision], N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 re re) < 1.00000000000000002e95

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[re \cdot re - im \cdot im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. difference-of-squares 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re - im\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \left(-im\right)\right)} \]

      3. add-sqr-sqrt 50.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-im} \cdot \sqrt{-im}}\right) \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 65.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-im\right) \cdot \left(-im\right)}}\right) \]

      5. sqr-neg 65.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}\right) \]

      6. sqrt-prod 15.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{im} \cdot \sqrt{im}}\right) \]

      7. add-sqr-sqrt 32.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{im}\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 32.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + im\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re - im\right)} \cdot \left(re + im\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in re around 0 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(re - im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in re around 0 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot im\right)} \cdot im \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 85.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)} \cdot im \]

   10. Simplified 85.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-im\right)} \cdot im \]

   if 1.00000000000000002e95 < (*.f64 re re)

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[re \cdot re - im \cdot im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. difference-of-squares 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re - im\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \left(-im\right)\right)} \]

      3. add-sqr-sqrt 54.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-im} \cdot \sqrt{-im}}\right) \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 88.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-im\right) \cdot \left(-im\right)}}\right) \]

      5. sqr-neg 88.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}\right) \]

      6. sqrt-prod 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{im} \cdot \sqrt{im}}\right) \]

      7. add-sqr-sqrt 81.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{im}\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + im\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in re around inf 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{re} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in re around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re} \cdot re \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \cdot re \leq 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(-im\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;re \cdot re\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 52.8% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ re \cdot re \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore re_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (* re re))

C

double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return re * re;
}

Fortran

real(8) function re_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    re_sqr = re * re
end function

Java

public static double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return re * re;
}

Python

def re_sqr(re, im):
	return re * re

Julia

function re_sqr(re, im)
	return Float64(re * re)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = re_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = re * re;
end

Wolfram

re$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(re * re), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[re \cdot re - im \cdot im \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. difference-of-squares 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re - im\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re + \left(-im\right)\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 51.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-im} \cdot \sqrt{-im}}\right) \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-im\right) \cdot \left(-im\right)}}\right) \]

   5. sqr-neg 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \sqrt{\color{blue}{im \cdot im}}\right) \]

   6. sqrt-prod 24.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{\sqrt{im} \cdot \sqrt{im}}\right) \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 53.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + \color{blue}{im}\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 53.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + im\right) \cdot \left(re + im\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in re around inf 58.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(re + im\right) \cdot \color{blue}{re} \]

6. Taylor expanded in re around inf 54.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re} \cdot re \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 11.4% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im \cdot im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore re_sqr (re im) :precision binary64 (* im im))

C

double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return im * im;
}

Fortran

real(8) function re_sqr(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    re_sqr = im * im
end function

Java

public static double re_sqr(double re, double im) {
	return im * im;
}

Python

def re_sqr(re, im):
	return im * im

Julia

function re_sqr(re, im)
	return Float64(im * im)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = re_sqr(re, im)
	tmp = im * im;
end

Wolfram

re$95$sqr[re_, im_] := N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.3%

   \[re \cdot re - im \cdot im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 56.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot {im}^{2}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-{im}^{2}} \]

5. Simplified 56.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-{im}^{2}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 10.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{-{im}^{2}} \cdot \sqrt{-{im}^{2}}} \]

   2. sqrt-unprod 17.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-{im}^{2}\right) \cdot \left(-{im}^{2}\right)}} \]

   3. sqr-neg 17.9%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt{\color{blue}{{im}^{2} \cdot {im}^{2}}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 14.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{im}^{2}} \cdot \sqrt{{im}^{2}}} \]

   5. add-sqr-sqrt 14.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{im}^{2}} \]

   6. unpow2 14.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im \cdot im} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 14.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im \cdot im} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024146 
(FPCore re_sqr (re im)
  :name "math.square on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* re re) (* im im)))