math.exp on complex, imaginary part

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 6.9s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \sin im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (sin im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * sin(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * sin(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.sin(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.sin(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * sin(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * sin(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \sin im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (sin im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * sin(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * sin(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.sin(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.sin(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * sin(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * sin(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \sin im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (sin im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * sin(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * sin(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.sin(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.sin(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * sin(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * sin(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.4% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -39:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (exp re) im)))
   (if (<= re -39.0)
     t_0
     (if (<= re 8.6e+42)
       (* (sin im) (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))
       (if (<= re 1e+103)
         t_0
         (*
          (sin im)
          (+
           1.0
           (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666))))))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = exp(re) * im;
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -39.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (re <= 8.6e+42) {
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	} else if (re <= 1e+103) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = exp(re) * im
    if (re <= (-39.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (re <= 8.6d+42) then
        tmp = sin(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
    else if (re <= 1d+103) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = sin(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = Math.exp(re) * im;
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -39.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (re <= 8.6e+42) {
		tmp = Math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	} else if (re <= 1e+103) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	t_0 = math.exp(re) * im
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -39.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif re <= 8.6e+42:
		tmp = math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))
	elif re <= 1e+103:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	t_0 = Float64(exp(re) * im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -39.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (re <= 8.6e+42)
		tmp = Float64(sin(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))));
	elseif (re <= 1e+103)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(sin(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	t_0 = exp(re) * im;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -39.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (re <= 8.6e+42)
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	elseif (re <= 1e+103)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * im), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[re, -39.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[re, 8.6e+42], N[(N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 1e+103], t$95$0, N[(N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -39 or 8.5999999999999996e42 < re < 1e103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 96.1%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   if -39 < re < 8.5999999999999996e42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

   5. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]

   if 1e103 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -39:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 93.2% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -39 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+42}\right) \land re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -39.0) (and (not (<= re 8.6e+42)) (<= re 1.9e+154)))
   (* (exp re) im)
   (* (sin im) (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -39.0) || (!(re <= 8.6e+42) && (re <= 1.9e+154))) {
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-39.0d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 8.6d+42)) .and. (re <= 1.9d+154)) then
        tmp = exp(re) * im
    else
        tmp = sin(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -39.0) || (!(re <= 8.6e+42) && (re <= 1.9e+154))) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -39.0) or (not (re <= 8.6e+42) and (re <= 1.9e+154)):
		tmp = math.exp(re) * im
	else:
		tmp = math.sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -39.0) || (!(re <= 8.6e+42) && (re <= 1.9e+154)))
		tmp = Float64(exp(re) * im);
	else
		tmp = Float64(sin(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -39.0) || (~((re <= 8.6e+42)) && (re <= 1.9e+154)))
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	else
		tmp = sin(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -39.0], And[N[Not[LessEqual[re, 8.6e+42]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[re, 1.9e+154]]], N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * im), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -39 or 8.5999999999999996e42 < re < 1.8999999999999999e154

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 92.2%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   if -39 < re < 8.5999999999999996e42 or 1.8999999999999999e154 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

   5. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -39 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+42}\right) \land re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 90.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -39 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -39.0) (not (<= re 8.6e+42)))
   (* (exp re) im)
   (* (sin im) (+ re 1.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -39.0) || !(re <= 8.6e+42)) {
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-39.0d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 8.6d+42))) then
        tmp = exp(re) * im
    else
        tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -39.0) || !(re <= 8.6e+42)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -39.0) or not (re <= 8.6e+42):
		tmp = math.exp(re) * im
	else:
		tmp = math.sin(im) * (re + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -39.0) || !(re <= 8.6e+42))
		tmp = Float64(exp(re) * im);
	else
		tmp = Float64(sin(im) * Float64(re + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -39.0) || ~((re <= 8.6e+42)))
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	else
		tmp = sin(im) * (re + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -39.0], N[Not[LessEqual[re, 8.6e+42]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * im), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -39 or 8.5999999999999996e42 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   if -39 < re < 8.5999999999999996e42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im + re \cdot \sin im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

   5. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -39 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 89.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -39 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -39.0) (not (<= re 8.6e+42))) (* (exp re) im) (sin im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -39.0) || !(re <= 8.6e+42)) {
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = sin(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-39.0d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 8.6d+42))) then
        tmp = exp(re) * im
    else
        tmp = sin(im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -39.0) || !(re <= 8.6e+42)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re) * im;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.sin(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -39.0) or not (re <= 8.6e+42):
		tmp = math.exp(re) * im
	else:
		tmp = math.sin(im)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -39.0) || !(re <= 8.6e+42))
		tmp = Float64(exp(re) * im);
	else
		tmp = sin(im);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -39.0) || ~((re <= 8.6e+42)))
		tmp = exp(re) * im;
	else
		tmp = sin(im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -39.0], N[Not[LessEqual[re, 8.6e+42]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * im), $MachinePrecision], N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -39 or 8.5999999999999996e42 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 85.8%

      \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

   if -39 < re < 8.5999999999999996e42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -39 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re} \cdot im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 63.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 8.8e+42)
   (sin im)
   (* im (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 8.8e+42) {
		tmp = sin(im);
	} else {
		tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 8.8d+42) then
        tmp = sin(im)
    else
        tmp = im * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 8.8e+42) {
		tmp = Math.sin(im);
	} else {
		tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 8.8e+42:
		tmp = math.sin(im)
	else:
		tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 8.8e+42)
		tmp = sin(im);
	else
		tmp = Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 8.8e+42)
		tmp = sin(im);
	else
		tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 8.8e+42], N[Sin[im], $MachinePrecision], N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < 8.8000000000000005e42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im} \]

   if 8.8000000000000005e42 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

   5. Simplified 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]

   6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 56.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;\sin im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 39.4% accurate, 13.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (* im (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 69.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

5. Simplified 69.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]

6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 41.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

7. Final simplification 41.6%

   \[\leadsto im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 37.3% accurate, 15.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im + re \cdot \left(im + re \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(re \cdot im\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (+ im (* re (+ im (* re (* 0.16666666666666666 (* re im)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im + (re * (im + (re * (0.16666666666666666 * (re * im)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im + (re * (im + (re * (0.16666666666666666d0 * (re * im)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im + (re * (im + (re * (0.16666666666666666 * (re * im)))));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im + (re * (im + (re * (0.16666666666666666 * (re * im)))))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im + Float64(re * Float64(im + Float64(re * Float64(0.16666666666666666 * Float64(re * im))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im + (re * (im + (re * (0.16666666666666666 * (re * im)))));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im + N[(re * N[(im + N[(re * N[(0.16666666666666666 * N[(re * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 69.1%

   \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 39.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im + re \cdot \left(im + re \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(im \cdot re\right) + 0.5 \cdot im\right)\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in re around inf 39.7%

   \[\leadsto im + re \cdot \left(im + re \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(im \cdot re\right)\right)}\right) \]

6. Final simplification 39.7%

   \[\leadsto im + re \cdot \left(im + re \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(re \cdot im\right)\right)\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 36.7% accurate, 18.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* im (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 64.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \sin im \]

5. Simplified 64.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \sin im \]

6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 39.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

7. Final simplification 39.0%

   \[\leadsto im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 36.3% accurate, 22.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \left(re \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ im (* im (* re (* re 0.5)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im + Float64(im * Float64(re * Float64(re * 0.5))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im + (im * (re * (re * 0.5)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im + N[(im * N[(re * N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 69.1%

   \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 35.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im + re \cdot \left(im + 0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 35.7%

      \[\leadsto im + re \cdot \left(im + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re \cdot im\right)}\right) \]

6. Simplified 35.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im + re \cdot \left(im + 0.5 \cdot \left(re \cdot im\right)\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in im around 0 39.0%

   \[\leadsto im + \color{blue}{im \cdot \left(re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]

8. Taylor expanded in re around inf 39.0%

   \[\leadsto im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot re\right)}\right) \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 39.0%

      \[\leadsto im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \]

10. Simplified 39.0%

    \[\leadsto im + im \cdot \left(re \cdot \color{blue}{\left(re \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 29.4% accurate, 40.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im \cdot \left(re + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* im (+ re 1.0)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (re + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im * (re + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im * (re + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im * (re + 1.0)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(im * Float64(re + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im * (re + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(im * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sin im + re \cdot \sin im} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

5. Simplified 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \sin im} \]

6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 30.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(re + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

7. Final simplification 30.9%

   \[\leadsto im \cdot \left(re + 1\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 26.1% accurate, 203.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 im)

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return im;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = im
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return im;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return im

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return im
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = im;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := im

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \sin im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 69.1%

   \[\leadsto e^{re} \cdot \color{blue}{im} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 30.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{im} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024146 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.exp on complex, imaginary part"
  :precision binary64
  (* (exp re) (sin im)))