Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.7% → 98.0%

Time: 10.6s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 0.4×

• 40.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.0% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma x y (fma z t (* a b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(x, y, fma(z, t, (a * b))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(x, y, fma(z, t, Float64(a * b))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(x * y + N[(z * t + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.9% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma a b (fma x y (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 43.1% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-151}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-148}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 57000:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -4.1e+73)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) -5.9e-9)
     (* z t)
     (if (<= (* x y) -1.05e-151)
       (* c i)
       (if (<= (* x y) 7.5e-148)
         (* z t)
         (if (<= (* x y) 57000.0)
           (* a b)
           (if (<= (* x y) 7e+127) (* z t) (* x y))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.1e+73) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5.9e-9) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.05e-151) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 7.5e-148) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 57000.0) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 7e+127) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-4.1d+73)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= (-5.9d-9)) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((x * y) <= (-1.05d-151)) then
        tmp = c * i
    else if ((x * y) <= 7.5d-148) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if ((x * y) <= 57000.0d0) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((x * y) <= 7d+127) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.1e+73) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5.9e-9) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1.05e-151) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 7.5e-148) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 57000.0) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 7e+127) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -4.1e+73:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= -5.9e-9:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (x * y) <= -1.05e-151:
		tmp = c * i
	elif (x * y) <= 7.5e-148:
		tmp = z * t
	elif (x * y) <= 57000.0:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (x * y) <= 7e+127:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -4.1e+73)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -5.9e-9)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -1.05e-151)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 7.5e-148)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 57000.0)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 7e+127)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.1e+73)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -5.9e-9)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -1.05e-151)
		tmp = c * i;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 7.5e-148)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 57000.0)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 7e+127)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.1e+73], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5.9e-9], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.05e-151], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 7.5e-148], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 57000.0], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 7e+127], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.0999999999999998e73 or 6.99999999999999956e127 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 90.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 74.7%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around 0 63.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -4.0999999999999998e73 < (*.f64 x y) < -5.8999999999999999e-9 or -1.04999999999999995e-151 < (*.f64 x y) < 7.5000000000000005e-148 or 57000 < (*.f64 x y) < 6.99999999999999956e127

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 71.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 48.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -5.8999999999999999e-9 < (*.f64 x y) < -1.04999999999999995e-151

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 56.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if 7.5000000000000005e-148 < (*.f64 x y) < 57000

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 55.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-151}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-148}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 57000:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* t (+ z (/ (* x y) t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z + ((x * y) / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z + ((x * y) / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = t * (z + ((x * y) / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z + Float64(Float64(x * y) / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t * (z + ((x * y) / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(t * N[(z + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 18.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   3. Simplified 18.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 18.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z + \frac{x \cdot y}{t}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 65.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-208}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -2.2e+56)
   (+ (* a b) (* x y))
   (if (<= (* x y) -6.5e-208)
     (+ (* c i) (* z t))
     (if (<= (* x y) 2.8e+113) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) (+ (* x y) (* c i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.2e+56) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((x * y) <= -6.5e-208) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.8e+113) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-2.2d+56)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else if ((x * y) <= (-6.5d-208)) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 2.8d+113) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.2e+56) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((x * y) <= -6.5e-208) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2.8e+113) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -2.2e+56:
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	elif (x * y) <= -6.5e-208:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 2.8e+113:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2.2e+56)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -6.5e-208)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2.8e+113)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.2e+56)
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	elseif ((x * y) <= -6.5e-208)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2.8e+113)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.2e+56], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -6.5e-208], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2.8e+113], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.20000000000000016e56

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.20000000000000016e56 < (*.f64 x y) < -6.4999999999999998e-208

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -6.4999999999999998e-208 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.79999999999999998e113

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 72.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 2.79999999999999998e113 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 76.6%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-208}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 65.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-207}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -4.4e+56)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) -5.4e-207)
       (+ (* c i) (* z t))
       (if (<= (* x y) 6.8e+120) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.4e+56) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5.4e-207) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.8e+120) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y)
    if ((x * y) <= (-4.4d+56)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= (-5.4d-207)) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((x * y) <= 6.8d+120) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.4e+56) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5.4e-207) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 6.8e+120) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -4.4e+56:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= -5.4e-207:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (x * y) <= 6.8e+120:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -4.4e+56)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -5.4e-207)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 6.8e+120)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -4.4e+56)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -5.4e-207)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 6.8e+120)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4.4e+56], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5.4e-207], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 6.8e+120], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.40000000000000032e56 or 6.79999999999999998e120 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -4.40000000000000032e56 < (*.f64 x y) < -5.4e-207

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -5.4e-207 < (*.f64 x y) < 6.79999999999999998e120

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 71.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-207}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 65.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* a b) (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -2.5e+113)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) -2.35e-156)
       (+ (* a b) (* c i))
       (if (<= (* x y) 2e+127) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.5e+113) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -2.35e-156) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+127) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y)
    if ((x * y) <= (-2.5d+113)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x * y) <= (-2.35d-156)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else if ((x * y) <= 2d+127) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.5e+113) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -2.35e-156) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+127) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y)
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -2.5e+113:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x * y) <= -2.35e-156:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	elif (x * y) <= 2e+127:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2.5e+113)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -2.35e-156)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+127)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (a * b) + (x * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.5e+113)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -2.35e-156)
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2e+127)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.5e+113], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.35e-156], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+127], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.5e113 or 1.99999999999999991e127 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.5e113 < (*.f64 x y) < -2.35000000000000023e-156

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 64.3%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -2.35000000000000023e-156 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.99999999999999991e127

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 71.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+127}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 87.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5 \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+106}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -5.0) (not (<= (* c i) 2e+106)))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -5.0) || !((c * i) <= 2e+106)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-5.0d0)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 2d+106))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -5.0) || !((c * i) <= 2e+106)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -5.0) or not ((c * i) <= 2e+106):
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -5.0) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 2e+106))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -5.0) || ~(((c * i) <= 2e+106)))
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -5.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2e+106]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -5 or 2.00000000000000018e106 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -5 < (*.f64 c i) < 2.00000000000000018e106

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5 \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+106}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 84.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -7.8e+118)
   (+ (* a b) (* x y))
   (if (<= (* x y) 8e+158)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* c i) (* z t)))
     (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -7.8e+118) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 8e+158) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-7.8d+118)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
    else if ((x * y) <= 8d+158) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -7.8e+118) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	} else if ((x * y) <= 8e+158) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -7.8e+118:
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y)
	elif (x * y) <= 8e+158:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -7.8e+118)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 8e+158)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -7.8e+118)
		tmp = (a * b) + (x * y);
	elseif ((x * y) <= 8e+158)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((c * i) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -7.8e+118], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 8e+158], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -7.8e118

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 92.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]

   if -7.8e118 < (*.f64 x y) < 7.99999999999999962e158

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 7.99999999999999962e158 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{+118}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 65.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+183} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+106}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -4.5e+183) (not (<= (* c i) 6.5e+106)))
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -4.5e+183) || !((c * i) <= 6.5e+106)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-4.5d+183)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 6.5d+106))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -4.5e+183) || !((c * i) <= 6.5e+106)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -4.5e+183) or not ((c * i) <= 6.5e+106):
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -4.5e+183) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 6.5e+106))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -4.5e+183) || ~(((c * i) <= 6.5e+106)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -4.5e+183], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 6.5e+106]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -4.50000000000000017e183 or 6.5000000000000003e106 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 81.2%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -4.50000000000000017e183 < (*.f64 c i) < 6.5000000000000003e106

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 65.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+183} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+106}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 63.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{+113} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+161}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -9.6e+113) (not (<= (* x y) 1.35e+161)))
   (* x y)
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -9.6e+113) || !((x * y) <= 1.35e+161)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-9.6d+113)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1.35d+161))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -9.6e+113) || !((x * y) <= 1.35e+161)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -9.6e+113) or not ((x * y) <= 1.35e+161):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -9.6e+113) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1.35e+161))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -9.6e+113) || ~(((x * y) <= 1.35e+161)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -9.6e+113], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.35e+161]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -9.59999999999999933e113 or 1.3499999999999999e161 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 81.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 77.3%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in c around 0 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -9.59999999999999933e113 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.3499999999999999e161

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around inf 62.0%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -9.6 \cdot 10^{+113} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+161}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 42.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+183} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+194}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -4.5e+183) (not (<= (* c i) 3.6e+194))) (* c i) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -4.5e+183) || !((c * i) <= 3.6e+194)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-4.5d+183)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 3.6d+194))) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -4.5e+183) || !((c * i) <= 3.6e+194)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -4.5e+183) or not ((c * i) <= 3.6e+194):
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -4.5e+183) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 3.6e+194))
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -4.5e+183) || ~(((c * i) <= 3.6e+194)))
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -4.5e+183], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 3.6e+194]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -4.50000000000000017e183 or 3.6e194 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -4.50000000000000017e183 < (*.f64 c i) < 3.6e194

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 63.8%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in a around 0 37.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+183} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+194}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 42.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -9.5e+23) (not (<= (* c i) 5.8e-19))) (* c i) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -9.5e+23) || !((c * i) <= 5.8e-19)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-9.5d+23)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 5.8d-19))) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -9.5e+23) || !((c * i) <= 5.8e-19)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -9.5e+23) or not ((c * i) <= 5.8e-19):
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -9.5e+23) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 5.8e-19))
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -9.5e+23) || ~(((c * i) <= 5.8e-19)))
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -9.5e+23], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 5.8e-19]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -9.50000000000000038e23 or 5.8e-19 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in c around inf 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -9.50000000000000038e23 < (*.f64 c i) < 5.8e-19

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

      5. fma-define 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 37.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 44.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-19}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 27.2% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 27.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024146 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))