Numeric.Log:$clog1p from log-domain-0.10.2.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.6s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.2×

• 43.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x 2.0) (* x x)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) + (x * x)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(x * x)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x 2.0) (* x x)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) + (x * x)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(x * x)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) + (x * x)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (fma y y (* x (+ x 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return fma(y, y, (x * (x + 2.0)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return fma(y, y, Float64(x * Float64(x + 2.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(y * y + N[(x * N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 2\right)}\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 89.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -58000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y + x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -58000.0)
   (* x (+ x 2.0))
   (if (<= x 6.8e+47) (+ (* y y) (* x 2.0)) (* x x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -58000.0) {
		tmp = x * (x + 2.0);
	} else if (x <= 6.8e+47) {
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-58000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * (x + 2.0d0)
    else if (x <= 6.8d+47) then
        tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -58000.0) {
		tmp = x * (x + 2.0);
	} else if (x <= 6.8e+47) {
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -58000.0:
		tmp = x * (x + 2.0)
	elif x <= 6.8e+47:
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = x * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -58000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(x + 2.0));
	elseif (x <= 6.8e+47)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * y) + Float64(x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -58000.0)
		tmp = x * (x + 2.0);
	elseif (x <= 6.8e+47)
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = x * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -58000.0], N[(x * N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 6.8e+47], N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -58000

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 2\right)}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

   if -58000 < x < 6.7999999999999996e47

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{2} + y \cdot y \]

   if 6.7999999999999996e47 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 2\right)}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -58000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y + x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot y \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-162}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y + x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* y y) 3.7e-162) (* x (+ x 2.0)) (+ (* y y) (* x x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * y) <= 3.7e-162) {
		tmp = x * (x + 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y * y) <= 3.7d-162) then
        tmp = x * (x + 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (y * y) + (x * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * y) <= 3.7e-162) {
		tmp = x * (x + 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (y * y) <= 3.7e-162:
		tmp = x * (x + 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * y) <= 3.7e-162)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(x + 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * y) + Float64(x * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y * y) <= 3.7e-162)
		tmp = x * (x + 2.0);
	else
		tmp = (y * y) + (x * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.7e-162], N[(x * N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y y) < 3.7000000000000002e-162

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 2\right)}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

   if 3.7000000000000002e-162 < (*.f64 y y)

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{x} + y \cdot y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot y \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-162}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y + x \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 58.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-16} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.8e-16) (not (<= x 2.0))) (* x x) (* x 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.8e-16) || !(x <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = x * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.8d-16)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * x
    else
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.8e-16) || !(x <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = x * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.8e-16) or not (x <= 2.0):
		tmp = x * x
	else:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.8e-16) || !(x <= 2.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.8e-16) || ~((x <= 2.0)))
		tmp = x * x;
	else
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.8e-16], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.8000000000000001e-16 or 2 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 2\right)}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -4.8000000000000001e-16 < x < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{2} + y \cdot y \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-16} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(x + 2\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ x 2.0)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * (x + 2.0)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x * (x + 2.0d0)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * (x + 2.0)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x * (x + 2.0)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(x + 2.0)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x * (x + 2.0)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x * N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(x + 2\right) + y \cdot y \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 59.8% accurate, 2.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(x + 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x (+ x 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * (x + 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * (x + 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * (x + 2.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * (x + 2.0)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * Float64(x + 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * (x + 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y + x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 2\right)}\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 61.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} \]

8. Final simplification 61.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(x + 2\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 20.4% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x 2.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * 2.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 + x \cdot x\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right)} + y \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 + x\right) + y \cdot y} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 64.7%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{2} + y \cdot y \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 22.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

7. Final simplification 22.7%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 2 \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot y + \left(2 \cdot x + x \cdot x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (* y y) (+ (* 2.0 x) (* x x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (y * y) + ((2.0 * x) + (x * x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (y * y) + ((2.0d0 * x) + (x * x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (y * y) + ((2.0 * x) + (x * x));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (y * y) + ((2.0 * x) + (x * x))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(y * y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 * x) + Float64(x * x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (y * y) + ((2.0 * x) + (x * x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024146 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Numeric.Log:$clog1p from log-domain-0.10.2.1, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* y y) (+ (* 2 x) (* x x))))

  (+ (+ (* x 2.0) (* x x)) (* y y)))