Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 84.8% → 99.8%

Time: 11.7s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 13.2×

• Could not converge on a ground truth

  1. reg0 = (bf #e4.009935430715278114942527599912612731588e59)
  2. reg1 = (bf #e-1.439375530959613280485742327654690321482e88)
  3. reg2 = (bf "-2.670947270454185306208800622788450458526e226")

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 84.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+53} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.085\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1e+53) (not (<= y 0.085)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (pow (exp y) (log (/ y (+ y z)))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1e+53) || !(y <= 0.085)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (pow(exp(y), log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1d+53)) .or. (.not. (y <= 0.085d0))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + ((exp(y) ** log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1e+53) || !(y <= 0.085)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.pow(Math.exp(y), Math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1e+53) or not (y <= 0.085):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.pow(math.exp(y), math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1e+53) || !(y <= 0.085))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64((exp(y) ^ log(Float64(y / Float64(y + z)))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1e+53) || ~((y <= 0.085)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + ((exp(y) ^ log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1e+53], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.085]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Power[N[Exp[y], $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -9.9999999999999999e52 or 0.0850000000000000061 < y

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 88.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 88.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 88.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 88.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   if -9.9999999999999999e52 < y < 0.0850000000000000061

   1. Initial program 87.0%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+53} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.085\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.65 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.01\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.65) (not (<= y 0.01)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.65) || !(y <= 0.01)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.65d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 0.01d0))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.65) || !(y <= 0.01)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.65) or not (y <= 0.01):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.65) || !(y <= 0.01))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.65) || ~((y <= 0.01)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.65], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.01]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.6499999999999999 or 0.0100000000000000002 < y

   1. Initial program 89.2%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   if -1.6499999999999999 < y < 0.0100000000000000002

   1. Initial program 85.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.65 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.01\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -500:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -500.0) (/ (exp (- z)) y) (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -500.0) {
		tmp = exp(-z) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-500.0d0)) then
        tmp = exp(-z) / y
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -500.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-z) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -500.0:
		tmp = math.exp(-z) / y
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -500.0)
		tmp = Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -500.0)
		tmp = exp(-z) / y;
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -500.0], N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -500

   1. Initial program 57.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 57.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 57.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 57.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 62.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   if -500 < z

   1. Initial program 95.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.6% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(-1 + z \cdot 0.5\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\frac{y - y \cdot z}{y}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))
   (if (<= y -2.6e+130)
     t_0
     (if (<= y -1.0)
       (+ x (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (+ -1.0 (* z 0.5)))) y))
       (if (<= y 6.4e+212) t_0 (+ x (/ (/ (- y (* y z)) y) y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x + (1.0 / y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.6e+130) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * (-1.0 + (z * 0.5)))) / y);
	} else if (y <= 6.4e+212) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    if (y <= (-2.6d+130)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 + (z * ((-1.0d0) + (z * 0.5d0)))) / y)
    else if (y <= 6.4d+212) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x + (1.0 / y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.6e+130) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * (-1.0 + (z * 0.5)))) / y);
	} else if (y <= 6.4e+212) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x + (1.0 / y)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2.6e+130:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= -1.0:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * (-1.0 + (z * 0.5)))) / y)
	elif y <= 6.4e+212:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.6e+130)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(z * 0.5)))) / y));
	elseif (y <= 6.4e+212)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - Float64(y * z)) / y) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x + (1.0 / y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2.6e+130)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * (-1.0 + (z * 0.5)))) / y);
	elseif (y <= 6.4e+212)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -2.6e+130], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 6.4e+212], t$95$0, N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -2.5999999999999998e130 or -1 < y < 6.3999999999999997e212

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 95.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 95.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]

   if -2.5999999999999998e130 < y < -1

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   if 6.3999999999999997e212 < y

   1. Initial program 72.9%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 72.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{1}{y}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{y} + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{1}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{y} - \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\frac{1}{y} - \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-sub 54.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot y - y \cdot z}{y \cdot y}} \]

      2. associate-/r* 87.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1 \cdot y - y \cdot z}{y}}{y}} \]

      3. *-un-lft-identity 87.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{y} - y \cdot z}{y}}{y} \]

      4. *-commutative 87.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\frac{y - \color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{y}}{y} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{y - z \cdot y}{y}}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(-1 + z \cdot 0.5\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+212}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\frac{y - y \cdot z}{y}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 86.5% accurate, 9.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.05e+103)
   (+ x (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z (+ 0.5 (* z -0.16666666666666666))) -1.0))) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e+103) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + (z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.05d+103)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 + (z * ((z * (0.5d0 + (z * (-0.16666666666666666d0)))) + (-1.0d0)))) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e+103) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + (z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.05e+103:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + (z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.05e+103)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(0.5 + Float64(z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.05e+103)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * (0.5 + (z * -0.16666666666666666))) + -1.0))) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.05e+103], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(0.5 + N[(z * -0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.0500000000000001e103

   1. Initial program 57.9%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 57.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 57.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 57.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot z}}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 65.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 65.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot z\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   if -1.0500000000000001e103 < z

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 96.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + z \cdot -0.16666666666666666\right) + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 84.9% accurate, 13.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+214}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\frac{y - y \cdot z}{y}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 5e+214) (+ x (/ 1.0 y)) (+ x (/ (/ (- y (* y z)) y) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5e+214) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 5d+214) then
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5e+214) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 5e+214:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5e+214)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - Float64(y * z)) / y) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 5e+214)
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (((y - (y * z)) / y) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5e+214], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.99999999999999953e214

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 95.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]

   if 4.99999999999999953e214 < y

   1. Initial program 72.9%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 72.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{1}{y}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{y} + -1 \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\frac{1}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{z}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 68.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{y} - \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\frac{1}{y} - \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. frac-sub 54.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot y - y \cdot z}{y \cdot y}} \]

      2. associate-/r* 87.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1 \cdot y - y \cdot z}{y}}{y}} \]

      3. *-un-lft-identity 87.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{y} - y \cdot z}{y}}{y} \]

      4. *-commutative 87.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\frac{y - \color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{y}}{y} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{y - z \cdot y}{y}}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+214}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\frac{y - y \cdot z}{y}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 66.8% accurate, 16.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.05 \cdot 10^{+96}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-34}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.05e+96) x (if (<= y 2.6e-34) (/ 1.0 y) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.05e+96) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 2.6e-34) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.05d+96)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 2.6d-34) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.05e+96) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 2.6e-34) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.05e+96:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 2.6e-34:
		tmp = 1.0 / y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.05e+96)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 2.6e-34)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.05e+96)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 2.6e-34)
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.05e+96], x, If[LessEqual[y, 2.6e-34], N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.04999999999999992e96 or 2.5999999999999999e-34 < y

   1. Initial program 88.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -3.04999999999999992e96 < y < 2.5999999999999999e-34

   1. Initial program 86.6%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 84.6% accurate, 42.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.6%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 93.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 93.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 48.7% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.6%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 93.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 93.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 47.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 91.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024146 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 17788539399477/2500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))