Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 6.8s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 29.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (* y (+ (* x y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * ((x * y) + z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + (y * ((x * y) + z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * ((x * y) + z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + (y * ((x * y) + z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(x * y) + z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + (y * ((x * y) + z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(y * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 88.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+101} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 10^{+87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.15e+101) (not (<= z 1e+87)))
   (+ t (* y z))
   (+ t (* y (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.15e+101) || !(z <= 1e+87)) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.15d+101)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1d+87))) then
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = t + (y * (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.15e+101) || !(z <= 1e+87)) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.15e+101) or not (z <= 1e+87):
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.15e+101) || !(z <= 1e+87))
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.15e+101) || ~((z <= 1e+87)))
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.15e+101], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1e+87]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.1500000000000001e101 or 9.9999999999999996e86 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]

   if -1.1500000000000001e101 < z < 9.9999999999999996e86

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \cdot y + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y + t \]

   5. Simplified 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+101} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 10^{+87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6300000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -6300000000.0) (not (<= y 8.5e+26)))
   (* y (+ (* x y) z))
   (+ t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6300000000.0) || !(y <= 8.5e+26)) {
		tmp = y * ((x * y) + z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-6300000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 8.5d+26))) then
        tmp = y * ((x * y) + z)
    else
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -6300000000.0) || !(y <= 8.5e+26)) {
		tmp = y * ((x * y) + z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -6300000000.0) or not (y <= 8.5e+26):
		tmp = y * ((x * y) + z)
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -6300000000.0) || !(y <= 8.5e+26))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(x * y) + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -6300000000.0) || ~((y <= 8.5e+26)))
		tmp = y * ((x * y) + z);
	else
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -6300000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 8.5e+26]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.3e9 or 8.5e26 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z + x \cdot y}{t}}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}}{t}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z}{t}\right) \]

      4. fma-undefine 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}}{t}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -6.3e9 < y < 8.5e26

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6300000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+26}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 79.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+82} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+147}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.7e+82) (not (<= y 1.05e+147))) (* y (* x y)) (+ t (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.7e+82) || !(y <= 1.05e+147)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.7d+82)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.05d+147))) then
        tmp = y * (x * y)
    else
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.7e+82) || !(y <= 1.05e+147)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.7e+82) or not (y <= 1.05e+147):
		tmp = y * (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.7e+82) || !(y <= 1.05e+147))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.7e+82) || ~((y <= 1.05e+147)))
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	else
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.7e+82], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.05e+147]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.6999999999999999e82 or 1.05000000000000003e147 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z + x \cdot y}{t}}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}}{t}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z}{t}\right) \]

      4. fma-undefine 96.5%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}}{t}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 76.2%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -2.6999999999999999e82 < y < 1.05000000000000003e147

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+82} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+147}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 65.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7600000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -7600000000.0) (not (<= y 4e+25))) (* y (* x y)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7600000000.0) || !(y <= 4e+25)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-7600000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 4d+25))) then
        tmp = y * (x * y)
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -7600000000.0) || !(y <= 4e+25)) {
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -7600000000.0) or not (y <= 4e+25):
		tmp = y * (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -7600000000.0) || !(y <= 4e+25))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -7600000000.0) || ~((y <= 4e+25)))
		tmp = y * (x * y);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -7600000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 4e+25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -7.6e9 or 4.00000000000000036e25 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z + x \cdot y}{t}}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}}{t}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z}{t}\right) \]

      4. fma-undefine 92.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}}{t}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.3%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -7.6e9 < y < 4.00000000000000036e25

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -7600000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 50.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+66} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+142}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4.4e+66) (not (<= z 2e+142))) (* y z) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.4e+66) || !(z <= 2e+142)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4.4d+66)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2d+142))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.4e+66) || !(z <= 2e+142)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4.4e+66) or not (z <= 2e+142):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4.4e+66) || !(z <= 2e+142))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4.4e+66) || ~((z <= 2e+142)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4.4e+66], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2e+142]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], t]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.3999999999999997e66 or 2.0000000000000001e142 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 80.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z + x \cdot y}{t}}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 80.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}}{t}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 80.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z}{t}\right) \]

      4. fma-undefine 80.2%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}}{t}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}{t}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 70.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -4.3999999999999997e66 < z < 2.0000000000000001e142

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 46.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 55.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+66} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+142}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 37.8% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 37.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024146 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))