Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 17.4s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (* PI (/ 1.0 s)))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) * (1.0f / s))))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / s))))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) * (single(1.0) / s))))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr98.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 25.0% accurate, 3.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (- (* 2.0 (/ (* u PI) (+ 1.0 (/ PI s)))) (* s (log1p (/ PI s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (2.0f * ((u * ((float) M_PI)) / (1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)))) - (s * log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) - Float32(s * log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u24.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-undefine14.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)\right)} - 1} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr14.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25 \cdot u, \pi, \pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right)} - 1} \]
  7. Simplified14.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \frac{u \cdot -0.25 + \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right)\right) + -1} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in u around 0 24.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative24.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot u}}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    2. log1p-define24.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot u}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Simplified24.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot u}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  11. Final simplification24.8%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 25.0% accurate, 4.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (log1p (/ PI s))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 24.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*24.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-124.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    3. log1p-define24.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  7. Simplified24.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 11.6% accurate, 28.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (+ (* PI (+ 0.25 (* u -0.25))) (* PI (* u -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * (0.25f + (u * -0.25f))) + (((float) M_PI) * (u * -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)))) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * ((single(pi) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.25)))) + (single(pi) * (u * single(-0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    9. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*10.8%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 11.6% accurate, 48.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\pi \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (* PI -4.0) (+ 0.25 (* u -0.5))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (((float) M_PI) * -4.0f) * (0.25f + (u * -0.5f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-4.0)) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.5))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = (single(pi) * single(-4.0)) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.5)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\pi \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u24.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-undefine14.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)\right)} - 1} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr14.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25 \cdot u, \pi, \pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right)} - 1} \]
  7. Simplified14.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \frac{u \cdot -0.25 + \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)}{s}\right)\right)\right) + -1} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.5 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*10.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.5 \cdot u\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-4 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 + \color{blue}{u \cdot -0.5}\right) \]
  10. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)} \]
  11. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(\pi \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right) \]
  12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 11.6% accurate, 48.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot 2 - \frac{\pi}{u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* u (- (* PI 2.0) (/ PI u))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return u * ((((float) M_PI) * 2.0f) - (((float) M_PI) / u));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(2.0)) - Float32(Float32(pi) / u)))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = u * ((single(pi) * single(2.0)) - (single(pi) / u));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot 2 - \frac{\pi}{u}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    8. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}}{s}\right) \]
    9. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}}{s}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u} + 2 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \pi + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right)} \]
    2. mul-1-neg10.8%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}\right) \]
    3. unsub-neg10.8%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \pi - \frac{\pi}{u}\right)} \]
    4. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot 2} - \frac{\pi}{u}\right) \]
  9. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot 2 - \frac{\pi}{u}\right)} \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 11.6% accurate, 61.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2\right) - \pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- (* PI (* u 2.0)) PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (((float) M_PI) * (u * 2.0f)) - ((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(u * Float32(2.0))) - Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = (single(pi) * (u * single(2.0))) - single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2\right) - \pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    8. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}}{s}\right) \]
    9. *-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25}{s}\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*10.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}}{s}\right) \]
  6. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-110.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\pi\right)} + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \]
    2. +-commutative10.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-\pi\right)} \]
    3. unsub-neg10.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi} \]
    4. associate-*r*10.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} - \pi \]
  9. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \pi} \]
  10. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 2\right) - \pi \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 10.4% accurate, 433.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 0.0)
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 0.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = 0.0e0
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(0.0)
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(0.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.8%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{1} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around 0 10.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024146 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))