Statistics.Sample:robustSumVarWeighted from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.0s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (* y z) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * z) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * z) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * z) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * z) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (* y z) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * z) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * z) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * z) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * z) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot y, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z (* z y) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, (z * y), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, Float64(z * y), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot z, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y \cdot z, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot y, x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 67.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.72 \cdot 10^{+30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 1.72e+30) x (* z (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.72e+30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 1.72d+30) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = z * (z * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.72e+30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 1.72e+30:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = z * (z * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.72e+30)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(z * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 1.72e+30)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = z * (z * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.72e+30], x, N[(z * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.7200000000000001e30

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.7200000000000001e30 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z + x} \]

      2. add-sqr-sqrt 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \cdot \sqrt{z}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \sqrt{z}, \sqrt{z}, x\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \sqrt{z}, \sqrt{z}, x\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, {z}^{2}, x\right)}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{y \cdot {z}^{2}}}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-div 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. pow2 75.9%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* 83.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]

      4. *-commutative 83.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.72 \cdot 10^{+30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 64.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+30}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 1.95e+30) x (* y (* z z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.95e+30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 1.95d+30) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y * (z * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.95e+30) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (z * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 1.95e+30:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y * (z * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.95e+30)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 1.95e+30)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y * (z * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.95e+30], x, N[(y * N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.95000000000000005e30

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.95000000000000005e30 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z + x} \]

      2. add-sqr-sqrt 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \cdot \sqrt{z}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \sqrt{z}, \sqrt{z}, x\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \sqrt{z}, \sqrt{z}, x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 75.9%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 75.9%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + z \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* z (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z * (z * y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (z * (z * y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z * (z * y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (z * (z * y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(z * y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (z * (z * y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(z * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 50.9% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024145 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Statistics.Sample:robustSumVarWeighted from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* (* y z) z)))