Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 69.0% → 99.0%

Time: 10.8s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 69.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -62000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -62000.0) (not (<= z 4.0)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (+
      0.08333333333333323
      (* z (- (* z 0.0007936505811533442) 0.00277777777751721)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 4.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-62000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442d0) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 4.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -62000.0) or not (z <= 4.0):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 4.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || ~((z <= 4.0)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -62000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -62000 or 4 < z

   1. Initial program 34.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 34.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 42.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   if -62000 < z < 4

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -62000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.7% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         0.279195317918525
         (* z (+ 0.4917317610505968 (* z 0.0692910599291889)))))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      1e+306)
   (fma
    y
    (/
     (fma z (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) 0.279195317918525)
     (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304))
    x)
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * (0.279195317918525 + (z * (0.4917317610505968 + (z * 0.0692910599291889))))) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+306) {
		tmp = fma(y, (fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(0.279195317918525 + Float64(z * Float64(0.4917317610505968 + Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889))))) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+306)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(0.279195317918525 + N[(z * N[(0.4917317610505968 + N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+306], N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 1.00000000000000002e306

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.00000000000000002e306 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 8.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.7% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         0.279195317918525
         (* z (+ 0.4917317610505968 (* z 0.0692910599291889)))))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      1e+306)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (/
      (fma (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) z 0.279195317918525)
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304))))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * (0.279195317918525 + (z * (0.4917317610505968 + (z * 0.0692910599291889))))) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+306) {
		tmp = x + (y * (fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(0.279195317918525 + Float64(z * Float64(0.4917317610505968 + Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889))))) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+306)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(0.279195317918525 + N[(z * N[(0.4917317610505968 + N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+306], N[(x + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 1.00000000000000002e306

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 97.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 97.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.00000000000000002e306 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 8.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304\\ t_1 := 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot t\_1}{t\_0} \leq 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{t\_1}{\frac{t\_0}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
        (t_1
         (+
          0.279195317918525
          (* z (+ 0.4917317610505968 (* z 0.0692910599291889))))))
   (if (<= (/ (* y t_1) t_0) 1e+306)
     (+ x (/ t_1 (/ t_0 y)))
     (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = 0.279195317918525 + (z * (0.4917317610505968 + (z * 0.0692910599291889)));
	double tmp;
	if (((y * t_1) / t_0) <= 1e+306) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 / (t_0 / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0
    t_1 = 0.279195317918525d0 + (z * (0.4917317610505968d0 + (z * 0.0692910599291889d0)))
    if (((y * t_1) / t_0) <= 1d+306) then
        tmp = x + (t_1 / (t_0 / y))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = 0.279195317918525 + (z * (0.4917317610505968 + (z * 0.0692910599291889)));
	double tmp;
	if (((y * t_1) / t_0) <= 1e+306) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 / (t_0 / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304
	t_1 = 0.279195317918525 + (z * (0.4917317610505968 + (z * 0.0692910599291889)))
	tmp = 0
	if ((y * t_1) / t_0) <= 1e+306:
		tmp = x + (t_1 / (t_0 / y))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	t_1 = Float64(0.279195317918525 + Float64(z * Float64(0.4917317610505968 + Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * t_1) / t_0) <= 1e+306)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_1 / Float64(t_0 / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	t_1 = 0.279195317918525 + (z * (0.4917317610505968 + (z * 0.0692910599291889)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((y * t_1) / t_0) <= 1e+306)
		tmp = x + (t_1 / (t_0 / y));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(0.279195317918525 + N[(z * N[(0.4917317610505968 + N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision], 1e+306], N[(x + N[(t$95$1 / N[(t$95$0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 1.00000000000000002e306

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 97.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 97.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 97.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot y} \]

      2. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \cdot y \]

      3. div-inv 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \cdot y \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \cdot y\right)} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{y}}} \]

      6. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}{y}} \]

      7. fma-undefine 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{y}} \]

      8. un-div-inv 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}}} \]

      9. fma-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}} \]

      10. *-commutative 99.4%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}} \]

      11. fma-undefine 99.4%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)}}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{y}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}}{y}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}}{y}} \]

   if 1.00000000000000002e306 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 8.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 8.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + z \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)}{\frac{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -62000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -62000.0) (not (<= z 5.1)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (+ (* z (* y -0.00277777777751721)) (* y 0.08333333333333323)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 5.1)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-62000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.1d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + ((z * (y * (-0.00277777777751721d0))) + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 5.1)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -62000.0) or not (z <= 5.1):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 5.1))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y * -0.00277777777751721)) + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || ~((z <= 5.1)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -62000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.1]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(z * N[(y * -0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -62000 or 5.0999999999999996 < z

   1. Initial program 34.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 34.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 42.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   if -62000 < z < 5.0999999999999996

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.14677053705526136 \cdot y - 0.14954831483277858 \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -62000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 98.9% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -62000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -62000.0) (not (<= z 5.1)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.08333333333333323 (* z -0.00277777777751721))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 5.1)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-62000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.1d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * (-0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 5.1)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -62000.0) or not (z <= 5.1):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 5.1))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * -0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || ~((z <= 5.1)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -62000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.1]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * -0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -62000 or 5.0999999999999996 < z

   1. Initial program 34.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 34.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 42.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   if -62000 < z < 5.0999999999999996

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + -0.00277777777751721 \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + \color{blue}{z \cdot -0.00277777777751721}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -62000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 98.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -62000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -62000.0) (not (<= z 5.4)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 5.4)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-62000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.4d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 5.4)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -62000.0) or not (z <= 5.4):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || !(z <= 5.4))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -62000.0) || ~((z <= 5.4)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -62000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.4]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -62000 or 5.4000000000000004 < z

   1. Initial program 34.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 34.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 42.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 42.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   if -62000 < z < 5.4000000000000004

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} + x \]

   7. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -62000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.4\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 60.8% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+64} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+150}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -5.5e+64) (not (<= y 1.45e+150))) (* y 0.0692910599291889) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.5e+64) || !(y <= 1.45e+150)) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-5.5d+64)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.45d+150))) then
        tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -5.5e+64) || !(y <= 1.45e+150)) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -5.5e+64) or not (y <= 1.45e+150):
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -5.5e+64) || !(y <= 1.45e+150))
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -5.5e+64) || ~((y <= 1.45e+150)))
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -5.5e+64], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.45e+150]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.4999999999999996e64 or 1.45000000000000005e150 < y

   1. Initial program 66.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 66.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 78.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 61.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 61.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 61.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 61.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.8%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889} \]

   if -5.4999999999999996e64 < y < 1.45000000000000005e150

   1. Initial program 72.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 72.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{+64} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+150}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 79.2% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.5%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. associate-/l* 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   3. fma-define 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   5. fma-define 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-define 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. fma-define 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 74.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 78.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 78.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 78.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

7. Simplified 78.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

8. Final simplification 78.2%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 50.3% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.5%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. associate-/l* 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   3. fma-define 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   5. fma-define 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-define 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. fma-define 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 74.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 55.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024145 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -324806146098267/40000000) (- (* (+ (/ 7512208616047561/100000000000000000 z) 692910599291889/10000000000000000) y) (- (/ (* 323697630959937/800000000000000 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 657611897278737700000) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (/ 1 (+ (* (+ z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)))) (- (* (+ (/ 7512208616047561/100000000000000000 z) 692910599291889/10000000000000000) y) (- (/ (* 323697630959937/800000000000000 y) (* z z)) x)))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))