math.exp on complex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 7.0s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{re} \cdot \cos im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (* (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return exp(re) * cos(im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = exp(re) * cos(im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return Math.exp(re) * Math.cos(im);
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return math.exp(re) * math.cos(im)

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(exp(re) * cos(im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = exp(re) * cos(im);
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 92.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 0.9998 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (exp re) 0.9998) (not (<= (exp re) 2.0))) (exp re) (cos im)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((exp(re) <= 0.9998) || !(exp(re) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((exp(re) <= 0.9998d0) .or. (.not. (exp(re) <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.exp(re) <= 0.9998) || !(Math.exp(re) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.exp(re) <= 0.9998) or not (math.exp(re) <= 2.0):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((exp(re) <= 0.9998) || !(exp(re) <= 2.0))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((exp(re) <= 0.9998) || ~((exp(re) <= 2.0)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 0.9998], N[Not[LessEqual[N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 re) < 0.99980000000000002 or 2 < (exp.f64 re)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if 0.99980000000000002 < (exp.f64 re) < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{re} \leq 0.9998 \lor \neg \left(e^{re} \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.00039:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 0.0085:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re -0.00039)
   (exp re)
   (if (<= re 0.0085)
     (* (cos im) (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))
     (if (<= re 1.02e+103)
       (exp re)
       (*
        (cos im)
        (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -0.00039) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else if (re <= 0.0085) {
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	} else if (re <= 1.02e+103) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= (-0.00039d0)) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else if (re <= 0.0085d0) then
        tmp = cos(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
    else if (re <= 1.02d+103) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= -0.00039) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else if (re <= 0.0085) {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	} else if (re <= 1.02e+103) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= -0.00039:
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	elif re <= 0.0085:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))
	elif re <= 1.02e+103:
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= -0.00039)
		tmp = exp(re);
	elseif (re <= 0.0085)
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))));
	elseif (re <= 1.02e+103)
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= -0.00039)
		tmp = exp(re);
	elseif (re <= 0.0085)
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	elseif (re <= 1.02e+103)
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, -0.00039], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 0.0085], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[re, 1.02e+103], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if re < -3.89999999999999993e-4 or 0.0085000000000000006 < re < 1.01999999999999991e103

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -3.89999999999999993e-4 < re < 0.0085000000000000006

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]

   if 1.01999999999999991e103 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.00039:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 0.0085:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;re \leq 1.02 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 96.4% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.00039 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.23\right) \land re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -0.00039) (and (not (<= re 0.23)) (<= re 1.9e+154)))
   (exp re)
   (* (cos im) (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.00039) || (!(re <= 0.23) && (re <= 1.9e+154))) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-0.00039d0)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.23d0)) .and. (re <= 1.9d+154)) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -0.00039) || (!(re <= 0.23) && (re <= 1.9e+154))) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -0.00039) or (not (re <= 0.23) and (re <= 1.9e+154)):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -0.00039) || (!(re <= 0.23) && (re <= 1.9e+154)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -0.00039) || (~((re <= 0.23)) && (re <= 1.9e+154)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -0.00039], And[N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.23]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[re, 1.9e+154]]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -3.89999999999999993e-4 or 0.23000000000000001 < re < 1.8999999999999999e154

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -3.89999999999999993e-4 < re < 0.23000000000000001 or 1.8999999999999999e154 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -0.00039 \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.23\right) \land re \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 93.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0022\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= re -8e-5) (not (<= re 0.0022))) (exp re) (* (cos im) (+ re 1.0))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -8e-5) || !(re <= 0.0022)) {
		tmp = exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((re <= (-8d-5)) .or. (.not. (re <= 0.0022d0))) then
        tmp = exp(re)
    else
        tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((re <= -8e-5) || !(re <= 0.0022)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(re);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if (re <= -8e-5) or not (re <= 0.0022):
		tmp = math.exp(re)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos(im) * (re + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((re <= -8e-5) || !(re <= 0.0022))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(im) * Float64(re + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((re <= -8e-5) || ~((re <= 0.0022)))
		tmp = exp(re);
	else
		tmp = cos(im) * (re + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[re, -8e-5], N[Not[LessEqual[re, 0.0022]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[re], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision] * N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < -8.00000000000000065e-5 or 0.00220000000000000013 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   if -8.00000000000000065e-5 < re < 0.00220000000000000013

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im + re \cdot \cos im} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

   5. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(re \leq 0.0022\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{re}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im \cdot \left(re + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 63.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 240:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos im\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot im\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 240.0)
   (cos im)
   (*
    (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666))))))
    (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* im im))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 240.0) {
		tmp = cos(im);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))) * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 240.0d0) then
        tmp = cos(im)
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))) * (1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (im * im)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 240.0) {
		tmp = Math.cos(im);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))) * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 240.0:
		tmp = math.cos(im)
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))) * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 240.0)
		tmp = cos(im);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666)))))) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * im))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 240.0)
		tmp = cos(im);
	else
		tmp = (1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))) * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 240.0], N[Cos[im], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < 240

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   if 240 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 72.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]

   6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -0.5 \cdot {im}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 60.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)}\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 40.1% accurate, 7.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;im \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0 \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot im\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666))))))))
   (if (<= im 1.95e+110) (* t_0 (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* im im)))) t_0)))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.95e+110) {
		tmp = t_0 * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))
    if (im <= 1.95d+110) then
        tmp = t_0 * (1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (im * im)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double t_0 = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	double tmp;
	if (im <= 1.95e+110) {
		tmp = t_0 * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	t_0 = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))
	tmp = 0
	if im <= 1.95e+110:
		tmp = t_0 * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	t_0 = Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (im <= 1.95e+110)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 * Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * im))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	t_0 = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (im <= 1.95e+110)
		tmp = t_0 * (1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[im, 1.95e+110], N[(t$95$0 * N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if im < 1.9500000000000002e110

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 68.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   5. Simplified 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} \cdot \cos im \]

   6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + -0.5 \cdot {im}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)}\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)}\right) \]

   if 1.9500000000000002e110 < im

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 45.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 23.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 75.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

   6. Simplified 23.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 41.1% accurate, 15.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 0.5 (* re 0.16666666666666666)))))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * (0.5d0 + (re * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(0.5 + Float64(re * 0.16666666666666666))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * (0.5 + (re * 0.16666666666666666)))));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(0.5 + N[(re * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 39.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot re\right)\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

6. Simplified 39.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 31.5% accurate, 16.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;re \leq 125:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + -0.5 \cdot \left(im \cdot im\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= re 125.0) 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* -0.5 (* im im)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 125.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (re <= 125.0d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + ((-0.5d0) * (im * im))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	double tmp;
	if (re <= 125.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	tmp = 0
	if re <= 125.0:
		tmp = 1.0
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (re <= 125.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(im * im)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(re, im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (re <= 125.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (-0.5 * (im * im));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := If[LessEqual[re, 125.0], 1.0, N[(1.0 + N[(-0.5 * N[(im * im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if re < 125

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 36.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

   if 125 < re

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in im around 0 15.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + -0.5 \cdot {im}^{2}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 60.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot \left(0.5 + re \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)}\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 15.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(im \cdot im\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 38.0% accurate, 22.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ 1.0 (* re (+ 1.0 (* re 0.5)))))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0 + (re * (1.0d0 + (re * 0.5d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)))

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * Float64(1.0 + Float64(re * 0.5))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0 + (re * (1.0 + (re * 0.5)));
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(1.0 + N[(re * N[(1.0 + N[(re * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 37.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot re\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + re \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{re \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \cdot \cos im \]

6. Simplified 37.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re \cdot \left(1 + re \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 28.7% accurate, 67.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ re + 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 (+ re 1.0))

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return re + 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = re + 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return re + 1.0;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return re + 1.0

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return Float64(re + 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = re + 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := N[(re + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in re around 0 53.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos im + re \cdot \cos im} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-rgt1-in 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

5. Simplified 53.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(re + 1\right) \cdot \cos im} \]

6. Taylor expanded in im around 0 28.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + re} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 28.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]

8. Simplified 28.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{re + 1} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 28.2% accurate, 203.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (re im) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(re, im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: re
    real(8), intent (in) :: im
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double re, double im) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(re, im):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(re, im)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(re, im)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[re_, im_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{re} \cdot \cos im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in im around 0 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{re}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in re around 0 28.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024144 
(FPCore (re im)
  :name "math.exp on complex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (* (exp re) (cos im)))