SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 94.0% → 97.3%
Time: 11.8s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 94.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 97.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 3.5e+141)
   (fma y_m (* z (- (tanh (/ t y_m)) (tanh (/ x y_m)))) x)
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.5e+141) {
		tmp = fma(y_m, (z * (tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m)))), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 3.5e+141)
		tmp = fma(y_m, Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) - tanh(Float64(x / y_m)))), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 3.5e+141], N[(y$95$m * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right), x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 3.5e141

    1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative95.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*97.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define97.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 3.5e141 < y

    1. Initial program 66.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 2.1e+141)
   (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y_m)) (tanh (/ x y_m))) (* y_m z)))
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.1e+141) {
		tmp = x + ((tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 2.1d+141) then
        tmp = x + ((tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.1e+141) {
		tmp = x + ((Math.tanh((t / y_m)) - Math.tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 2.1e+141:
		tmp = x + ((math.tanh((t / y_m)) - math.tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 2.1e+141)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) - tanh(Float64(x / y_m))) * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 2.1e+141)
		tmp = x + ((tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 2.1e+141], N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.0999999999999998e141

    1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    if 2.0999999999999998e141 < y

    1. Initial program 66.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification95.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+141}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 3.1e+113)
   (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y_m)) (* y_m z)))
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.1e+113) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 3.1d+113) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.1e+113) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 3.1e+113:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 3.1e+113)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 3.1e+113)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 3.1e+113], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 3.09999999999999991e113

    1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*23.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
      2. associate-/r*23.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]
      3. div-sub23.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]
      4. rec-exp23.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      5. rec-exp23.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      6. tanh-def-a79.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]
    5. Simplified79.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

    if 3.09999999999999991e113 < y

    1. Initial program 69.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification82.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 77.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 2.9e-36) x (fma z (- t x) x)))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.9e-36) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, (t - x), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 2.9e-36)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(t - x), x);
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 2.9e-36], x, N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-36}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.90000000000000013e-36

    1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative95.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*97.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define97.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 63.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 2.90000000000000013e-36 < y

    1. Initial program 79.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative79.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*87.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define87.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative81.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]
      2. fma-define81.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]
    7. Simplified81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 77.6% accurate, 17.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 2.35e-35) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.35e-35) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 2.35d-35) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2.35e-35) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 2.35e-35:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 2.35e-35)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 2.35e-35)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 2.35e-35], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 2.35e-35

    1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative95.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*97.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define97.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 63.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 2.35e-35 < y

    1. Initial program 79.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 71.1% accurate, 21.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y_m 6.2e-35) x (+ x (* z t))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 6.2e-35) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 6.2d-35) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 6.2e-35) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 6.2e-35:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 6.2e-35)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 6.2e-35)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 6.2e-35], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 6.20000000000000024e-35

    1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative95.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*97.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define97.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 63.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 6.20000000000000024e-35 < y

    1. Initial program 79.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 32.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r*31.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]
      2. associate-/r*31.3%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]
      3. div-sub31.3%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]
      4. rec-exp31.3%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      5. rec-exp31.3%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]
      6. tanh-def-a62.9%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]
    5. Simplified62.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 66.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative66.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
    8. Simplified66.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 67.5% accurate, 21.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 4.6e+49) x (* x (- 1.0 z))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.6e+49) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 4.6d+49) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.6e+49) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 4.6e+49:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 4.6e+49)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 4.6e+49)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 4.6e+49], x, N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < 4.60000000000000004e49

    1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative95.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*97.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define97.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 4.60000000000000004e49 < y

    1. Initial program 73.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 60.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg57.7%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg57.7%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]
    6. Simplified57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 60.7% accurate, 23.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+185}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 2.5e+185) x (* z (- x))))
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.5e+185) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 2.5d+185) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = z * -x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.5e+185) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 2.5e+185:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = z * -x
	return tmp
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 2.5e+185)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-x));
	end
	return tmp
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 2.5e+185)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = z * -x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 2.5e+185], x, N[(z * (-x)), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+185}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < 2.49999999999999995e185

    1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative91.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
      2. associate-*l*93.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
      3. fma-define93.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    3. Simplified93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

    if 2.49999999999999995e185 < z

    1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 43.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg35.9%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]
      2. unsub-neg35.9%

        \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]
    6. Simplified35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
    7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-neg35.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot z} \]
      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in35.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
    9. Simplified35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification59.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+185}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 61.1% accurate, 213.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ x \end{array} \]
y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 x)
y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}
y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function
y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}
y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	return x
y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	return x
end
y_m = abs(y);
function tmp = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end
y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := x
\begin{array}{l}
y_m = \left|y\right|

\\
x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 90.1%

    \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]
    2. associate-*l*94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]
    3. fma-define94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
  3. Simplified94.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 56.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024144 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))