Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 95.6% → 99.9%

Time: 8.1s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 0.5×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ y (- (* 1.1283791670955126 (exp z)) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126d0 * exp(z)) - (x * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * Math.exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * math.exp(z)) - (x * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - Float64(x * y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ y (- (* 1.1283791670955126 (exp z)) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126d0 * exp(z)) - (x * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * Math.exp(z)) - (x * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * math.exp(z)) - (x * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - Float64(x * y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y / ((1.1283791670955126 * exp(z)) - (x * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (- x (/ y (fma x y (* (exp z) -1.1283791670955126))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / fma(x, y, (exp(z) * -1.1283791670955126)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / fma(x, y, Float64(exp(z) * -1.1283791670955126))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / N[(x * y + N[(N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision] * -1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x + \frac{y}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+218}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ x (/ y (- (* (exp z) 1.1283791670955126) (* x y))))))
   (if (<= t_0 4e+218) t_0 (+ x (/ -1.0 x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x + (y / ((exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - (x * y)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 4e+218) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x + (y / ((exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126d0) - (x * y)))
    if (t_0 <= 4d+218) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x + (y / ((Math.exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - (x * y)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 4e+218) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x + (y / ((math.exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - (x * y)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 4e+218:
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - Float64(x * y))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 4e+218)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x + (y / ((exp(z) * 1.1283791670955126) - (x * y)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= 4e+218)
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision] * 1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 4e+218], t$95$0, N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (/.f64 y (-.f64 (*.f64 #s(literal 5641895835477563/5000000000000000 binary64) (exp.f64 z)) (*.f64 x y)))) < 4.00000000000000033e218

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 4.00000000000000033e218 < (+.f64 x (/.f64 y (-.f64 (*.f64 #s(literal 5641895835477563/5000000000000000 binary64) (exp.f64 z)) (*.f64 x y))))

   1. Initial program 74.1%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \frac{y}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+218}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-103}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;e^{z} \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 3.6e-103)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= (exp z) 3.7e+111) (+ x (/ y (- 1.1283791670955126 (* x y)))) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 3.6e-103) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (exp(z) <= 3.7e+111) {
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 - (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(z) <= 3.6d-103) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (exp(z) <= 3.7d+111) then
        tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126d0 - (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 3.6e-103) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (Math.exp(z) <= 3.7e+111) {
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 - (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 3.6e-103:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif math.exp(z) <= 3.7e+111:
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 - (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 3.6e-103)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (exp(z) <= 3.7e+111)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(1.1283791670955126 - Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(z) <= 3.6e-103)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (exp(z) <= 3.7e+111)
		tmp = x + (y / (1.1283791670955126 - (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 3.6e-103], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 3.7e+111], N[(x + N[(y / N[(1.1283791670955126 - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 3.5999999999999998e-103

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

   if 3.5999999999999998e-103 < (exp.f64 z) < 3.7000000000000003e111

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]

   if 3.7000000000000003e111 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 89.8%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-103}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;e^{z} \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 - x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 82.8% accurate, 7.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{-134}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{-1.1283791670955126}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 2.05e-134)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 6.8e-17) (- x (/ y -1.1283791670955126)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.05e-134) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 6.8e-17) {
		tmp = x - (y / -1.1283791670955126);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 2.05d-134) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 6.8d-17) then
        tmp = x - (y / (-1.1283791670955126d0))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.05e-134) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 6.8e-17) {
		tmp = x - (y / -1.1283791670955126);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 2.05e-134:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 6.8e-17:
		tmp = x - (y / -1.1283791670955126)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 2.05e-134)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 6.8e-17)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / -1.1283791670955126));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 2.05e-134)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 6.8e-17)
		tmp = x - (y / -1.1283791670955126);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 2.05e-134], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 6.8e-17], N[(x - N[(y / -1.1283791670955126), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < 2.0500000000000001e-134

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

   if 2.0500000000000001e-134 < z < 6.7999999999999996e-17

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}} \]

   if 6.7999999999999996e-17 < z

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{-134}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{-1.1283791670955126}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 82.8% accurate, 7.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-134}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 1.5e-134)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 x))
   (if (<= z 2.15e-8) (- x (* y -0.8862269254527579)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.5e-134) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 2.15e-8) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 1.5d-134) then
        tmp = x + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    else if (z <= 2.15d-8) then
        tmp = x - (y * (-0.8862269254527579d0))
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.5e-134) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	} else if (z <= 2.15e-8) {
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 1.5e-134:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x)
	elif z <= 2.15e-8:
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.5e-134)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	elseif (z <= 2.15e-8)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * -0.8862269254527579));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 1.5e-134)
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / x);
	elseif (z <= 2.15e-8)
		tmp = x - (y * -0.8862269254527579);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.5e-134], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.15e-8], N[(x - N[(y * -0.8862269254527579), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < 1.5e-134

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 84.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

   if 1.5e-134 < z < 2.1500000000000001e-8

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-0.8862269254527579 \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]

   8. Simplified 86.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot -0.8862269254527579} \]

   if 2.1500000000000001e-8 < z

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-134}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot -0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 68.8% accurate, 8.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-1}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -3e-5) x (if (<= x 4e-35) (/ -1.0 x) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3e-5) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 4e-35) {
		tmp = -1.0 / x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-3d-5)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 4d-35) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) / x
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3e-5) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 4e-35) {
		tmp = -1.0 / x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3e-5:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 4e-35:
		tmp = -1.0 / x
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3e-5)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 4e-35)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 / x);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3e-5)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 4e-35)
		tmp = -1.0 / x;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -3e-5], x, If[LessEqual[x, 4e-35], N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.00000000000000008e-5 or 4.00000000000000003e-35 < x

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -3.00000000000000008e-5 < x < 4.00000000000000003e-35

   1. Initial program 94.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{1}{x}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{x}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 70.0% accurate, 8.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{-184}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -7.8e-184) x (if (<= x 9.8e-275) (* y 0.8862269254527579) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7.8e-184) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 9.8e-275) {
		tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-7.8d-184)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 9.8d-275) then
        tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7.8e-184) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 9.8e-275) {
		tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -7.8e-184:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 9.8e-275:
		tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -7.8e-184)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 9.8e-275)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.8862269254527579);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -7.8e-184)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 9.8e-275)
		tmp = y * 0.8862269254527579;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -7.8e-184], x, If[LessEqual[x, 9.8e-275], N[(y * 0.8862269254527579), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -7.79999999999999988e-184 or 9.79999999999999964e-275 < x

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -7.79999999999999988e-184 < x < 9.79999999999999964e-275

   1. Initial program 92.0%

      \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y\right)}}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{-y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}} \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 92.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{-\left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      6. neg-sub0 91.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0 - \left(1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y\right)}} \]

      7. associate--r- 91.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(0 - 1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right) + x \cdot y}} \]

      8. neg-sub0 92.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)} + x \cdot y} \]

      9. +-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(-1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      10. fma-define 92.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z}\right)}} \]

      11. *-commutative 92.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -\color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot 1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-neg-in 92.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{e^{z} \cdot \left(-1.1283791670955126\right)}\right)} \]

      13. metadata-eval 92.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot \color{blue}{-1.1283791670955126}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, e^{z} \cdot -1.1283791670955126\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 55.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{x \cdot y - 1.1283791670955126}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8862269254527579 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{-184}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.8862269254527579\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 69.2% accurate, 111.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.9%

   \[x + \frac{y}{1.1283791670955126 \cdot e^{z} - x \cdot y} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{\frac{1.1283791670955126}{y} \cdot e^{z} - x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ 1.0 (- (* (/ 1.1283791670955126 y) (exp z)) x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * exp(z)) - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / (((1.1283791670955126d0 / y) * exp(z)) - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * Math.exp(z)) - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * math.exp(z)) - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(1.1283791670955126 / y) * exp(z)) - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / (((1.1283791670955126 / y) * exp(z)) - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(1.1283791670955126 / y), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024144 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invErfc from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ x (/ 1 (- (* (/ 5641895835477563/5000000000000000 y) (exp z)) x))))

  (+ x (/ y (- (* 1.1283791670955126 (exp z)) (* x y)))))