Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 68.5% → 99.4%

Time: 12.0s

Alternatives: 16

Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 68.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      2e+300)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (/
      (fma (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) z 0.279195317918525)
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304))))
   (fma y 0.0692910599291889 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+300) {
		tmp = x + (y * (fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, 0.0692910599291889, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+300)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, 0.0692910599291889, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+300], N[(x + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889 + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 2.0000000000000001e300

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 2.0000000000000001e300 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 12.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.2% accurate, 0.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{t\_0}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{t\_0}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{6.012459259764103}{z}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
           0.279195317918525))))
   (if (<= (/ t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304)) 2e+300)
     (+
      x
      (/
       t_0
       (+ 3.350343815022304 (* z (* z (+ 1.0 (/ 6.012459259764103 z)))))))
     (fma y 0.0692910599291889 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+300) {
		tmp = x + (t_0 / (3.350343815022304 + (z * (z * (1.0 + (6.012459259764103 / z))))));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, 0.0692910599291889, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+300)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_0 / Float64(3.350343815022304 + Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(1.0 + Float64(6.012459259764103 / z)))))));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, 0.0692910599291889, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+300], N[(x + N[(t$95$0 / N[(3.350343815022304 + N[(z * N[(z * N[(1.0 + N[(6.012459259764103 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889 + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 2.0000000000000001e300

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + 6.012459259764103 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{6.012459259764103 \cdot 1}{z}}\right)\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. metadata-eval 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{\color{blue}{6.012459259764103}}{z}\right)\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   5. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{6.012459259764103}{z}\right)\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   if 2.0000000000000001e300 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 12.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{6.012459259764103}{z}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.2% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{t\_0}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{t\_0}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{6.012459259764103}{z}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
           0.279195317918525))))
   (if (<= (/ t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304)) 2e+300)
     (+
      x
      (/
       t_0
       (+ 3.350343815022304 (* z (* z (+ 1.0 (/ 6.012459259764103 z)))))))
     (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+300) {
		tmp = x + (t_0 / (3.350343815022304 + (z * (z * (1.0 + (6.012459259764103 / z))))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0)
    if ((t_0 / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0)) <= 2d+300) then
        tmp = x + (t_0 / (3.350343815022304d0 + (z * (z * (1.0d0 + (6.012459259764103d0 / z))))))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+300) {
		tmp = x + (t_0 / (3.350343815022304 + (z * (z * (1.0 + (6.012459259764103 / z))))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+300:
		tmp = x + (t_0 / (3.350343815022304 + (z * (z * (1.0 + (6.012459259764103 / z))))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+300)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_0 / Float64(3.350343815022304 + Float64(z * Float64(z * Float64(1.0 + Float64(6.012459259764103 / z)))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+300)
		tmp = x + (t_0 / (3.350343815022304 + (z * (z * (1.0 + (6.012459259764103 / z))))));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+300], N[(x + N[(t$95$0 / N[(3.350343815022304 + N[(z * N[(z * N[(1.0 + N[(6.012459259764103 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 2.0000000000000001e300

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + 6.012459259764103 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{6.012459259764103 \cdot 1}{z}}\right)\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. metadata-eval 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{\color{blue}{6.012459259764103}}{z}\right)\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   5. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{6.012459259764103}{z}\right)\right)} \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   if 2.0000000000000001e300 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 12.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(1 + \frac{6.012459259764103}{z}\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 96.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0 + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (/
          (*
           y
           (+
            (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
            0.279195317918525))
          (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))))
   (if (<= t_0 2e+300) (+ t_0 x) (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 2e+300) {
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0)
    if (t_0 <= 2d+300) then
        tmp = t_0 + x
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 2e+300) {
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 2e+300:
		tmp = t_0 + x
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 2e+300)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 + x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= 2e+300)
		tmp = t_0 + x;
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 2e+300], N[(t$95$0 + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 2.0000000000000001e300

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 2.0000000000000001e300 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 0.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 12.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 12.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+300}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.4)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (-
      0.0692910599291889
      (/ (+ (/ 0.4046220386999212 z) -0.07512208616047561) z))))
   (if (<= z 3.0)
     (+
      x
      (*
       y
       (+
        0.08333333333333323
        (*
         z
         (-
          (* z (+ 0.0007936505811533442 (* z -0.0005951669793454025)))
          0.00277777777751721)))))
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else if (z <= 3.0) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.4d0)) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 - (((0.4046220386999212d0 / z) + (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z)))
    else if (z <= 3.0d0) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442d0 + (z * (-0.0005951669793454025d0)))) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else if (z <= 3.0) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.4:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)))
	elif z <= 3.0:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.4)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z))));
	elseif (z <= 3.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(0.0007936505811533442 + Float64(z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.4)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	elseif (z <= 3.0)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * (0.0007936505811533442 + (z * -0.0005951669793454025))) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 - N[(N[(N[(0.4046220386999212 / z), $MachinePrecision] + -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.0], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * N[(0.0007936505811533442 + N[(z * -0.0005951669793454025), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004

   1. Initial program 44.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 44.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 51.2%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 51.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 97.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + -1 \cdot \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot 1}{z}} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212}}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + -0.0005951669793454025 \cdot z\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   if 3 < z

   1. Initial program 40.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 40.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 52.3%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 52.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 + z \cdot -0.0005951669793454025\right) - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.4)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (-
      0.0692910599291889
      (/ (+ (/ 0.4046220386999212 z) -0.07512208616047561) z))))
   (if (<= z 3.6)
     (+
      x
      (*
       y
       (+
        0.08333333333333323
        (* z (- (* z 0.0007936505811533442) 0.00277777777751721)))))
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else if (z <= 3.6) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.4d0)) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 - (((0.4046220386999212d0 / z) + (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z)))
    else if (z <= 3.6d0) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442d0) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else if (z <= 3.6) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.4:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)))
	elif z <= 3.6:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.4)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z))));
	elseif (z <= 3.6)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.4)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	elseif (z <= 3.6)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 - N[(N[(N[(0.4046220386999212 / z), $MachinePrecision] + -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.6], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004

   1. Initial program 44.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 44.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 51.2%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 51.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 97.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + -1 \cdot \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot 1}{z}} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212}}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 97.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.60000000000000009 < z

   1. Initial program 40.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 40.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 52.3%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 52.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.4)
   (+ x (- (* y 0.0692910599291889) (/ (* y -0.07512208616047561) z)))
   (if (<= z 3.6)
     (+
      x
      (*
       y
       (+
        0.08333333333333323
        (* z (- (* z 0.0007936505811533442) 0.00277777777751721)))))
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else if (z <= 3.6) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.4d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889d0) - ((y * (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z))
    else if (z <= 3.6d0) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442d0) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else if (z <= 3.6) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.4:
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z))
	elif z <= 3.6:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.4)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889) - Float64(Float64(y * -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	elseif (z <= 3.6)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.4)
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	elseif (z <= 3.6)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[(x + N[(N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.6], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004

   1. Initial program 44.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 44.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 51.2%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 51.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 97.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out-- 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 - -0.4166096748901212\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.60000000000000009 < z

   1. Initial program 40.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 40.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 52.3%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 52.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.4) (not (<= z 3.6)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+ x (+ (* -0.00277777777751721 (* y z)) (* y 0.08333333333333323)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.4d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.6d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (((-0.00277777777751721d0) * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.4) or not (z <= 3.6):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(-0.00277777777751721 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || ~((z <= 3.6)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(-0.00277777777751721 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004 or 3.60000000000000009 < z

   1. Initial program 42.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 42.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 51.7%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 99.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.4)
   (+ x (- (* y 0.0692910599291889) (/ (* y -0.07512208616047561) z)))
   (if (<= z 3.6)
     (+ x (+ (* -0.00277777777751721 (* y z)) (* y 0.08333333333333323)))
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else if (z <= 3.6) {
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.4d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889d0) - ((y * (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z))
    else if (z <= 3.6d0) then
        tmp = x + (((-0.00277777777751721d0) * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.4) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else if (z <= 3.6) {
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.4:
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z))
	elif z <= 3.6:
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.4)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889) - Float64(Float64(y * -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	elseif (z <= 3.6)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(-0.00277777777751721 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.4)
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	elseif (z <= 3.6)
		tmp = x + ((-0.00277777777751721 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[(x + N[(N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.6], N[(x + N[(N[(-0.00277777777751721 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004

   1. Initial program 44.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 44.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 51.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 51.2%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 51.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 97.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out-- 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 - -0.4166096748901212\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 97.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 3.60000000000000009 < z

   1. Initial program 40.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 40.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 52.3%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 52.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 99.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.4) (not (<= z 3.6)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.08333333333333323 (* z -0.00277777777751721))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.4d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.6d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * (-0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.4) or not (z <= 3.6):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * -0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || ~((z <= 3.6)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * -0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004 or 3.60000000000000009 < z

   1. Initial program 42.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 42.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 51.7%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + -0.00277777777751721 \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + \color{blue}{z \cdot -0.00277777777751721}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 99.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.4) (not (<= z 3.6)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.4d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.6d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.4) or not (z <= 3.6):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || ~((z <= 3.6)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004 or 3.60000000000000009 < z

   1. Initial program 42.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 42.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. remove-double-neg 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

      8. fma-define 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      9. fma-define 51.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      10. fma-define 51.7%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 60.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{-192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-229}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-110}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.65e-192)
   x
   (if (<= x -1.2e-229)
     (* y 0.0692910599291889)
     (if (<= x 1.8e-110) (* y 0.08333333333333323) x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.65e-192) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.2e-229) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else if (x <= 1.8e-110) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.65d-192)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= (-1.2d-229)) then
        tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889d0
    else if (x <= 1.8d-110) then
        tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.65e-192) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.2e-229) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else if (x <= 1.8e-110) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.65e-192:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= -1.2e-229:
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889
	elif x <= 1.8e-110:
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.65e-192)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.2e-229)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889);
	elseif (x <= 1.8e-110)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.65e-192)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.2e-229)
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	elseif (x <= 1.8e-110)
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.65e-192], x, If[LessEqual[x, -1.2e-229], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.8e-110], N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision], x]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -2.64999999999999985e-192 or 1.79999999999999997e-110 < x

   1. Initial program 69.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 69.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 69.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 74.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2.64999999999999985e-192 < x < -1.2e-229

   1. Initial program 82.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 82.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 82.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 51.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 51.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 51.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 51.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 51.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 51.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 51.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 51.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]

   if -1.2e-229 < x < 1.79999999999999997e-110

   1. Initial program 74.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 74.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 74.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 74.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} + x \]

      3. fma-define 65.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.08333333333333323, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.08333333333333323, x\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{-192}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-229}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-110}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 98.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.4) (not (<= z 3.6)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.4d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.6d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.4) or not (z <= 3.6):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.4) || !(z <= 3.6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.4) || ~((z <= 3.6)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.4], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.4000000000000004 or 3.60000000000000009 < z

   1. Initial program 42.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 42.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 42.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 48.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 48.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 48.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 48.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 48.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 48.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 48.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 48.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

   7. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

   if -5.4000000000000004 < z < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} + x \]

   7. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323 + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.4 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.6\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 59.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-190}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -7e-190) x (if (<= x 7.5e-39) (* y 0.0692910599291889) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e-190) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 7.5e-39) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-7d-190)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 7.5d-39) then
        tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -7e-190) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 7.5e-39) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -7e-190:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 7.5e-39:
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -7e-190)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 7.5e-39)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -7e-190)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 7.5e-39)
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -7e-190], x, If[LessEqual[x, 7.5e-39], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.9999999999999999e-190 or 7.49999999999999971e-39 < x

   1. Initial program 69.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 69.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 69.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -6.9999999999999999e-190 < x < 7.49999999999999971e-39

   1. Initial program 74.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 74.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 74.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

      3. associate-/l* 73.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      4. fma-define 73.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative 73.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 73.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. fma-define 73.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative 73.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      9. fma-define 73.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 60.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 60.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 60.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

      3. fma-define 60.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 60.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 0.0692910599291889, x\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around inf 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-190}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 79.4% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.9%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

   3. associate-/l* 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   4. fma-define 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   5. *-commutative 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-define 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. fma-define 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. *-commutative 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   9. fma-define 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 73.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 79.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + x \]

7. Simplified 79.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + x} \]

8. Final simplification 79.1%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 50.7% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.9%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot y}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x \]

   3. associate-/l* 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \cdot \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   4. fma-define 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   5. *-commutative 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-define 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}, \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. fma-define 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. *-commutative 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   9. fma-define 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 73.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right), \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 51.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024144 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -324806146098267/40000000) (- (* (+ (/ 7512208616047561/100000000000000000 z) 692910599291889/10000000000000000) y) (- (/ (* 323697630959937/800000000000000 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 657611897278737700000) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (/ 1 (+ (* (+ z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)))) (- (* (+ (/ 7512208616047561/100000000000000000 z) 692910599291889/10000000000000000) y) (- (/ (* 323697630959937/800000000000000 y) (* z z)) x)))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))