Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.4s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) - \left(x + y\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ x y) (* (+ x y) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) - ((x + y) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) - ((x + y) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) - ((x + y) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) - ((x + y) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) - Float64(Float64(x + y) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) - ((x + y) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) - \left(x + y\right) \cdot z \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 75.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.38 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.38e-6) (not (<= z 1.85e-9))) (* y (- 1.0 z)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.38e-6) || !(z <= 1.85e-9)) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.38d-6)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.85d-9))) then
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.38e-6) || !(z <= 1.85e-9)) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.38e-6) or not (z <= 1.85e-9):
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.38e-6) || !(z <= 1.85e-9))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.38e-6) || ~((z <= 1.85e-9)))
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.38e-6], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.85e-9]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.3799999999999999e-6 or 1.85e-9 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if -1.3799999999999999e-6 < z < 1.85e-9

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.38 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 75.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -50 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -50.0) (not (<= z 1.0))) (* y (- z)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -50.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-50.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * -z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -50.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -50.0) or not (z <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * -z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -50.0) || !(z <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -50.0) || ~((z <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * -z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -50.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -50 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 47.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 47.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   8. Simplified 47.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -50 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -50 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 51.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-259}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (+ x y) -1e-259) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (- y (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-259) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x + y) <= (-1d-259)) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = y - (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-259) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y - (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x + y) <= -1e-259:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = y - (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x + y) <= -1e-259)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y - Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x + y) <= -1e-259)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = y - (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], -1e-259], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x y) < -1.0000000000000001e-259

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 59.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 59.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 59.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.0000000000000001e-259 < (+.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 53.3%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 53.3%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   7. Simplified 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-neg-out 53.3%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 53.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - y \cdot z} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y - y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-259}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y - y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 61.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-131}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.4e-131) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* y (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.4e-131) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.4d-131)) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.4e-131) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.4e-131:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.4e-131)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.4e-131)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.4e-131], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.4e-131

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. Simplified 72.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.4e-131 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-131}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 30.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-89}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -4.4e-89) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.4e-89) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-4.4d-89)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.4e-89) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4.4e-89:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4.4e-89)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4.4e-89)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -4.4e-89], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.40000000000000024e-89

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 46.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -4.40000000000000024e-89 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 47.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 47.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   5. Simplified 47.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 32.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 50.4% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

5. Simplified 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

6. Final simplification 53.2%

   \[\leadsto x + y \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 26.6% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 53.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

5. Simplified 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 28.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024144 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))