Statistics.Distribution.Poisson:$clogProbability from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.5s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - z) - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - z) - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - z) - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+41} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.2e+41) (not (<= x 1.6e+85)))
   (- (* x (log y)) y)
   (- (- z) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.2e+41) || !(x <= 1.6e+85)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.2d+41)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.6d+85))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - y
    else
        tmp = -z - y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.2e+41) || !(x <= 1.6e+85)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.2e+41) or not (x <= 1.6e+85):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - y
	else:
		tmp = -z - y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.2e+41) || !(x <= 1.6e+85))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.2e+41) || ~((x <= 1.6e+85)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - y;
	else
		tmp = -z - y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.2e+41], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.6e+85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision], N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.1999999999999999e41 or 1.60000000000000009e85 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - y} \]

   if -2.1999999999999999e41 < x < 1.60000000000000009e85

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) + \left(-y\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - y} \]

   5. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+41} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 79.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+53} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{+130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.6e+53) (not (<= x 2.9e+130))) (* x (log y)) (- (- z) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.6e+53) || !(x <= 2.9e+130)) {
		tmp = x * log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.6d+53)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.9d+130))) then
        tmp = x * log(y)
    else
        tmp = -z - y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.6e+53) || !(x <= 2.9e+130)) {
		tmp = x * Math.log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.6e+53) or not (x <= 2.9e+130):
		tmp = x * math.log(y)
	else:
		tmp = -z - y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.6e+53) || !(x <= 2.9e+130))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.6e+53) || ~((x <= 2.9e+130)))
		tmp = x * log(y);
	else
		tmp = -z - y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.6e+53], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.9e+130]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.59999999999999998e53 or 2.8999999999999999e130 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]

   if -2.59999999999999998e53 < x < 2.8999999999999999e130

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(y + z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

      3. distribute-neg-in 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) + \left(-y\right)} \]

      4. sub-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - y} \]

   5. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.6 \cdot 10^{+53} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{+130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 53.2% accurate, 15.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+36}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 8.8e+36) (- z) (- y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.8e+36) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 8.8d+36) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.8e+36) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 8.8e+36:
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 8.8e+36)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 8.8e+36)
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 8.8e+36], (-z), (-y)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 8.80000000000000002e36

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   5. Simplified 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if 8.80000000000000002e36 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 62.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

   5. Simplified 62.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 66.7% accurate, 26.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -z - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(-z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 69.6%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   3. distribute-neg-in 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) + \left(-y\right)} \]

   4. sub-neg 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - y} \]

5. Simplified 69.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) - y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 34.0% accurate, 53.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := (-y)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 37.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 37.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

5. Simplified 37.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 2.3% accurate, 107.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 y)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := y

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 37.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 37.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

5. Simplified 37.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-sub0 37.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - y} \]

   2. sub-neg 37.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-y\right)} \]

   3. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}} \]

   4. sqrt-unprod 2.1%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}} \]

   5. sqr-neg 2.1%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}} \]

   6. sqrt-unprod 2.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}} \]

   7. add-sqr-sqrt 2.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{y} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 2.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + y} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-lft-identity 2.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

9. Simplified 2.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024144 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Poisson:$clogProbability from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))