exp-w (used to crash)

Percentage Accurate: 99.4% → 99.4%

Time: 42.5s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: N/A×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. w = 2.00000000000000007e154
  2. l = -2

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (* (exp (- w)) (pow l (exp w))))

C

double code(double w, double l) {
	return exp(-w) * pow(l, exp(w));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = exp(-w) * (l ** exp(w))
end function

Java

public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return Math.exp(-w) * Math.pow(l, Math.exp(w));
}

Python

def code(w, l):
	return math.exp(-w) * math.pow(l, math.exp(w))

Julia

function code(w, l)
	return Float64(exp(Float64(-w)) * (l ^ exp(w)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = exp(-w) * (l ^ exp(w));
end

Wolfram

code[w_, l_] := N[(N[Exp[(-w)], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[l, N[Exp[w], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (* (exp (- w)) (pow l (exp w))))

C

double code(double w, double l) {
	return exp(-w) * pow(l, exp(w));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = exp(-w) * (l ** exp(w))
end function

Java

public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return Math.exp(-w) * Math.pow(l, Math.exp(w));
}

Python

def code(w, l):
	return math.exp(-w) * math.pow(l, math.exp(w))

Julia

function code(w, l)
	return Float64(exp(Float64(-w)) * (l ^ exp(w)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = exp(-w) * (l ^ exp(w));
end

Wolfram

code[w_, l_] := N[(N[Exp[(-w)], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[l, N[Exp[w], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{w}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (/ (pow l (exp w)) (exp w)))

C

double code(double w, double l) {
	return pow(l, exp(w)) / exp(w);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = (l ** exp(w)) / exp(w)
end function

Java

public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return Math.pow(l, Math.exp(w)) / Math.exp(w);
}

Python

def code(w, l):
	return math.pow(l, math.exp(w)) / math.exp(w)

Julia

function code(w, l)
	return Float64((l ^ exp(w)) / exp(w))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = (l ^ exp(w)) / exp(w);
end

Wolfram

code[w_, l_] := N[(N[Power[l, N[Exp[w], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Exp[w], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{w}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-\left(-w\right)}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}}} \]

   4. *-lft-identity 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{\color{blue}{w}}} \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{w}}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.2% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\ell}{e^{w}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (/ l (exp w)))

C

double code(double w, double l) {
	return l / exp(w);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = l / exp(w)
end function

Java

public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return l / Math.exp(w);
}

Python

def code(w, l):
	return l / math.exp(w)

Julia

function code(w, l)
	return Float64(l / exp(w))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = l / exp(w);
end

Wolfram

code[w_, l_] := N[(l / N[Exp[w], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{w}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-\left(-w\right)}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}}} \]

   4. *-lft-identity 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{\color{blue}{w}}} \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{w}}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in w around 0 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\color{blue}{1}}}{e^{w}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in l around 0 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\ell}{e^{w}}} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.6% accurate, 10.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \ell + w \cdot \left(w \cdot \left(\left(\ell - \ell \cdot 0.5\right) - w \cdot \left(\left(\ell \cdot 0.16666666666666666 + \ell \cdot -0.5\right) - \left(\ell \cdot 0.5 - \ell\right)\right)\right) - \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (w l)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  l
  (*
   w
   (-
    (*
     w
     (-
      (- l (* l 0.5))
      (* w (- (+ (* l 0.16666666666666666) (* l -0.5)) (- (* l 0.5) l)))))
    l))))

C

double code(double w, double l) {
	return l + (w * ((w * ((l - (l * 0.5)) - (w * (((l * 0.16666666666666666) + (l * -0.5)) - ((l * 0.5) - l))))) - l));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = l + (w * ((w * ((l - (l * 0.5d0)) - (w * (((l * 0.16666666666666666d0) + (l * (-0.5d0))) - ((l * 0.5d0) - l))))) - l))
end function

Java

public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return l + (w * ((w * ((l - (l * 0.5)) - (w * (((l * 0.16666666666666666) + (l * -0.5)) - ((l * 0.5) - l))))) - l));
}

Python

def code(w, l):
	return l + (w * ((w * ((l - (l * 0.5)) - (w * (((l * 0.16666666666666666) + (l * -0.5)) - ((l * 0.5) - l))))) - l))

Julia

function code(w, l)
	return Float64(l + Float64(w * Float64(Float64(w * Float64(Float64(l - Float64(l * 0.5)) - Float64(w * Float64(Float64(Float64(l * 0.16666666666666666) + Float64(l * -0.5)) - Float64(Float64(l * 0.5) - l))))) - l)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = l + (w * ((w * ((l - (l * 0.5)) - (w * (((l * 0.16666666666666666) + (l * -0.5)) - ((l * 0.5) - l))))) - l));
end

Wolfram

code[w_, l_] := N[(l + N[(w * N[(N[(w * N[(N[(l - N[(l * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(w * N[(N[(N[(l * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision] + N[(l * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(l * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{w}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-\left(-w\right)}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}}} \]

   4. *-lft-identity 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{\color{blue}{w}}} \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{w}}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in w around 0 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\color{blue}{1}}}{e^{w}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in w around 0 76.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell + w \cdot \left(w \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(w \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \ell + 0.5 \cdot \ell\right) + \left(-0.5 \cdot \ell + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot \ell\right)\right)\right) - \left(-1 \cdot \ell + 0.5 \cdot \ell\right)\right) - \ell\right)} \]

7. Final simplification 76.1%

   \[\leadsto \ell + w \cdot \left(w \cdot \left(\left(\ell - \ell \cdot 0.5\right) - w \cdot \left(\left(\ell \cdot 0.16666666666666666 + \ell \cdot -0.5\right) - \left(\ell \cdot 0.5 - \ell\right)\right)\right) - \ell\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 70.1% accurate, 27.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \ell - w \cdot \left(\ell + w \cdot \left(\ell \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (- l (* w (+ l (* w (* l -0.5))))))

C

double code(double w, double l) {
	return l - (w * (l + (w * (l * -0.5))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = l - (w * (l + (w * (l * (-0.5d0)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return l - (w * (l + (w * (l * -0.5))));
}

Python

def code(w, l):
	return l - (w * (l + (w * (l * -0.5))))

Julia

function code(w, l)
	return Float64(l - Float64(w * Float64(l + Float64(w * Float64(l * -0.5)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = l - (w * (l + (w * (l * -0.5))));
end

Wolfram

code[w_, l_] := N[(l - N[(w * N[(l + N[(w * N[(l * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{w}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-\left(-w\right)}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}}} \]

   4. *-lft-identity 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{\color{blue}{w}}} \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{w}}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in w around 0 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\color{blue}{1}}}{e^{w}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in w around 0 70.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell + w \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(w \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \ell + 0.5 \cdot \ell\right)\right) - \ell\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \ell + w \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot w\right) \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \ell + 0.5 \cdot \ell\right)} - \ell\right) \]

   2. neg-mul-1 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \ell + w \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-w\right)} \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \ell + 0.5 \cdot \ell\right) - \ell\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-out 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \ell + w \cdot \left(\left(-w\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \left(-1 + 0.5\right)\right)} - \ell\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \ell + w \cdot \left(\left(-w\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \color{blue}{-0.5}\right) - \ell\right) \]

8. Simplified 70.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell + w \cdot \left(\left(-w\right) \cdot \left(\ell \cdot -0.5\right) - \ell\right)} \]

9. Final simplification 70.5%

   \[\leadsto \ell - w \cdot \left(\ell + w \cdot \left(\ell \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 63.4% accurate, 61.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \ell - \ell \cdot w \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 (- l (* l w)))

C

double code(double w, double l) {
	return l - (l * w);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = l - (l * w)
end function

Java

public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return l - (l * w);
}

Python

def code(w, l):
	return l - (l * w)

Julia

function code(w, l)
	return Float64(l - Float64(l * w))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = l - (l * w);
end

Wolfram

code[w_, l_] := N[(l - N[(l * w), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{w}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-\left(-w\right)}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}}} \]

   4. *-lft-identity 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{\color{blue}{w}}} \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{w}}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in w around 0 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\color{blue}{1}}}{e^{w}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in w around 0 64.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell + -1 \cdot \left(\ell \cdot w\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 64.9%

      \[\leadsto \ell + \color{blue}{\left(-\ell \cdot w\right)} \]

   2. unsub-neg 64.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell - \ell \cdot w} \]

8. Simplified 64.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell - \ell \cdot w} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 56.3% accurate, 305.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \ell \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (w l) :precision binary64 l)

C

double code(double w, double l) {
	return l;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(w, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: w
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = l
end function

Java

public static double code(double w, double l) {
	return l;
}

Python

def code(w, l):
	return l

Julia

function code(w, l)
	return l
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(w, l)
	tmp = l;
end

Wolfram

code[w_, l_] := l

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[e^{-w} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{w}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-\left(-w\right)}}} \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot {\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}}} \]

   4. *-lft-identity 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}}{e^{-\left(-w\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{\color{blue}{w}}} \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\ell}^{\left(e^{w}\right)}}{e^{w}}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in w around 0 57.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024143 
(FPCore (w l)
  :name "exp-w (used to crash)"
  :precision binary64
  (* (exp (- w)) (pow l (exp w))))