Hyperbolic secant

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 17.6s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ 2.0 (+ (exp x) (exp (- x)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 2.0 / (exp(x) + exp(-x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 2.0d0 / (exp(x) + exp(-x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 2.0 / (Math.exp(x) + Math.exp(-x));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 2.0 / (math.exp(x) + math.exp(-x))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(2.0 / Float64(exp(x) + exp(Float64(-x))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 2.0 / (exp(x) + exp(-x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(2.0 / N[(N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ 2.0 (+ (exp x) (exp (- x)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 2.0 / (exp(x) + exp(-x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 2.0d0 / (exp(x) + exp(-x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 2.0 / (Math.exp(x) + Math.exp(-x));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 2.0 / (math.exp(x) + math.exp(-x))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(2.0 / Float64(exp(x) + exp(Float64(-x))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 2.0 / (exp(x) + exp(-x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(2.0 / N[(N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ 2.0 (+ (exp x) (exp (- x)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 2.0 / (exp(x) + exp(-x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 2.0d0 / (exp(x) + exp(-x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 2.0 / (Math.exp(x) + Math.exp(-x));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 2.0 / (math.exp(x) + math.exp(-x))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(2.0 / Float64(exp(x) + exp(Float64(-x))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 2.0 / (exp(x) + exp(-x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(2.0 / N[(N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 76.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{e^{x} + \left(1 - x\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ 2.0 (+ (exp x) (- 1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 2.0 / (exp(x) + (1.0 - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 2.0d0 / (exp(x) + (1.0d0 - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 2.0 / (Math.exp(x) + (1.0 - x));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 2.0 / (math.exp(x) + (1.0 - x))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(2.0 / Float64(exp(x) + Float64(1.0 - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 2.0 / (exp(x) + (1.0 - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(2.0 / N[(N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot x\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)}\right)} \]

   2. unsub-neg 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right)}} \]

5. Simplified 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right)}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 88.4% accurate, 7.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 360:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 0.5\right)\right) + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 360.0)
   (/ 2.0 (+ (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 1.0 (* x 0.5)))) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ (* x 0.5) -1.0)))))
   0.0))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 360.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)))) + (1.0 + (x * ((x * 0.5) + -1.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 360.0d0) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / ((1.0d0 + (x * (1.0d0 + (x * 0.5d0)))) + (1.0d0 + (x * ((x * 0.5d0) + (-1.0d0)))))
    else
        tmp = 0.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 360.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)))) + (1.0 + (x * ((x * 0.5) + -1.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 360.0:
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)))) + (1.0 + (x * ((x * 0.5) + -1.0))))
	else:
		tmp = 0.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 360.0)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * 0.5)))) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + -1.0)))));
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 360.0)
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)))) + (1.0 + (x * ((x * 0.5) + -1.0))));
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, 360.0], N[(2.0 / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 360

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot x\right) - 1\right)\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot x\right)\right)} + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot x\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot x\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot x\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 0.5\right)\right) + \left(1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot x - 1\right)}\right)} \]

   if 360 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 360:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 0.5\right)\right) + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 91.7% accurate, 8.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 360:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\left(1 - x\right) + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + x \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 360.0)
   (/
    2.0
    (+
     (- 1.0 x)
     (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 0.5 (* x 0.16666666666666666))))))))
   0.0))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 360.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 - x) + (1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * (0.5 + (x * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 360.0d0) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / ((1.0d0 - x) + (1.0d0 + (x * (1.0d0 + (x * (0.5d0 + (x * 0.16666666666666666d0)))))))
    else
        tmp = 0.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 360.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 - x) + (1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * (0.5 + (x * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 360.0:
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 - x) + (1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * (0.5 + (x * 0.16666666666666666)))))))
	else:
		tmp = 0.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 360.0)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(0.5 + Float64(x * 0.16666666666666666))))))));
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 360.0)
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 - x) + (1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * (0.5 + (x * 0.16666666666666666)))))));
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, 360.0], N[(2.0 / N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(0.5 + N[(x * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 360

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot x\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right)}} \]

   5. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(1 - x\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\left(1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)}\right) + \left(1 - x\right)} \]

      2. *-lft-identity 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\left(1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)}\right) + \left(1 - x\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.16666666666666666}\right)\right)\right) + \left(1 - x\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + x \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)} + \left(1 - x\right)} \]

   if 360 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 360:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\left(1 - x\right) + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \left(0.5 + x \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 88.1% accurate, 10.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 360:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\left(1 - x\right) + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 360.0) (/ 2.0 (+ (- 1.0 x) (+ 1.0 (* x (+ 1.0 (* x 0.5)))))) 0.0))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 360.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 - x) + (1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 360.0d0) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / ((1.0d0 - x) + (1.0d0 + (x * (1.0d0 + (x * 0.5d0)))))
    else
        tmp = 0.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 360.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 - x) + (1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)))));
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 360.0:
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 - x) + (1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)))))
	else:
		tmp = 0.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 360.0)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64(x * 0.5))))));
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 360.0)
		tmp = 2.0 / ((1.0 - x) + (1.0 + (x * (1.0 + (x * 0.5)))));
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, 360.0], N[(2.0 / N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 360

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot x\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right)}} \]

   5. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{e^{x} + \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot x\right)\right)} + \left(1 - x\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot x\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} + \left(1 - x\right)} \]

   if 360 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 360:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{\left(1 - x\right) + \left(1 + x \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 75.3% accurate, 34.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 350:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (if (<= x 350.0) 1.0 0.0))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 350.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 350.0d0) then
        tmp = 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = 0.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 350.0) {
		tmp = 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 350.0:
		tmp = 1.0
	else:
		tmp = 0.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 350.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 350.0)
		tmp = 1.0;
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, 350.0], 1.0, 0.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 350

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

   if 350 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 34.5% accurate, 34.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 350:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (if (<= x 350.0) 0.5 0.0))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 350.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 350.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = 0.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 350.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 350.0:
		tmp = 0.5
	else:
		tmp = 0.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 350.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 350.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 0.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[LessEqual[x, 350.0], 0.5, 0.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 350

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   4. Applied egg-rr 13.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]

   if 350 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 50.5% accurate, 206.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 0.0)

C

double code(double x) {
	return 0.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 0.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 0.0;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 0.0

Julia

function code(x)
	return 0.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := 0.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{2}{e^{x} + e^{-x}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

4. Applied egg-rr 53.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024143 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Hyperbolic secant"
  :precision binary64
  (/ 2.0 (+ (exp x) (exp (- x)))))