Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3

Percentage Accurate: 97.9% → 100.0%

Time: 14.3s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.3×

• 20.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (- y z) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, (y - z), z);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, Float64(y - z), z)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-out-- 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 1 - z \cdot x\right)} \]

   3. *-rgt-identity 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{z} - z \cdot x\right) \]

   4. cancel-sign-sub-inv 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-z\right) \cdot x\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot x + z\right)} \]

   6. associate-+r+ 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(-z\right) \cdot x\right) + z} \]

   7. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot x + x \cdot y\right)} + z \]

   8. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(-z\right) \cdot x + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) + z \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(-z\right) + y\right)} + z \]

   10. fma-define 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \left(-z\right) + y, z\right)} \]

   11. +-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y + \left(-z\right)}, z\right) \]

   12. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \color{blue}{y - z}, z\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y - z, z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -210000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -210000.0) (not (<= x 1.0))) (* x (- y z)) (+ z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -210000.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-210000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -210000.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -210000.0) or not (x <= 1.0):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -210000.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -210000.0) || ~((x <= 1.0)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -210000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.1e5 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   if -2.1e5 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -210000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 79.1% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.45 \cdot 10^{+54} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+122}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.45e+54) (not (<= z 1.45e+122)))
   (* z (- 1.0 x))
   (* x (- y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.45e+54) || !(z <= 1.45e+122)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.45d+54)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.45d+122))) then
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - x)
    else
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.45e+54) || !(z <= 1.45e+122)) {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.45e+54) or not (z <= 1.45e+122):
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x)
	else:
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.45e+54) || !(z <= 1.45e+122))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.45e+54) || ~((z <= 1.45e+122)))
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	else
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.45e+54], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.45e+122]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.45e54 or 1.45e122 < z

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]

   if -2.45e54 < z < 1.45e122

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 80.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 80.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.45 \cdot 10^{+54} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+122}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 82.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.75 \cdot 10^{-100}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.5e-8) (not (<= x 3.75e-100))) (* x (- y z)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-8) || !(x <= 3.75e-100)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.5d-8)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.75d-100))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-8) || !(x <= 3.75e-100)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.5e-8) or not (x <= 3.75e-100):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.5e-8) || !(x <= 3.75e-100))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-8) || ~((x <= 3.75e-100)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.5e-8], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.75e-100]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.50000000000000024e-8 or 3.75000000000000007e-100 < x

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 93.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   if -3.50000000000000024e-8 < x < 3.75000000000000007e-100

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.75 \cdot 10^{-100}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 59.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.05 \cdot 10^{-100}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.5e-8) (not (<= x 4.05e-100))) (* x y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.5e-8) || !(x <= 4.05e-100)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.5d-8)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.05d-100))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.5e-8) || !(x <= 4.05e-100)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.5e-8) or not (x <= 4.05e-100):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.5e-8) || !(x <= 4.05e-100))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.5e-8) || ~((x <= 4.05e-100)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.5e-8], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.05e-100]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.49999999999999997e-8 or 4.05e-100 < x

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 61.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -6.49999999999999997e-8 < x < 4.05e-100

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.05 \cdot 10^{-100}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (* x (- y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + (x * (y - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x * (y - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + (x * (y - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + Float64(x * Float64(y - z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + (x * (y - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

   4. neg-sub0 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   5. neg-sub0 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   6. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

   7. distribute-lft-neg-in 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   8. remove-double-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot \left(1 - x\right) + x \cdot y \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out-- 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot z - x \cdot z\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   10. *-lft-identity 97.6%

       \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} - x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y \]

   11. associate-+l- 97.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(x \cdot z - x \cdot y\right)} \]

   12. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + x \cdot \left(y - z\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 36.1% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 91.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(1 + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 32.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024143 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))