Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, C

Percentage Accurate: 97.6% → 98.8%

Time: 28.8s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.0×

• 33.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0d0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0d0)) + c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)) + c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0d0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0d0)) + c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)) + c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (fma x y (fma z (/ t 16.0) (/ (* a b) -4.0))) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return fma(x, y, fma(z, (t / 16.0), ((a * b) / -4.0))) + c;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(fma(x, y, fma(z, Float64(t / 16.0), Float64(Float64(a * b) / -4.0))) + c)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(t / 16.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(\frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\right)} + c \]

   2. fma-define 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)} + c \]

   3. associate-/l* 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

   4. fma-neg 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, -\frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)}\right) + c \]

   5. distribute-neg-frac2 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot b}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

   6. metadata-eval 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{\color{blue}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

3. Simplified 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ c + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \frac{t}{16}\right) - a \cdot \frac{b}{4}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ c (- (fma x y (* z (/ t 16.0))) (* a (/ b 4.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c + (fma(x, y, (z * (t / 16.0))) - (a * (b / 4.0)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(c + Float64(fma(x, y, Float64(z * Float64(t / 16.0))) - Float64(a * Float64(b / 4.0))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(c + N[(N[(x * y + N[(z * N[(t / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * N[(b / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{4} - c\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y + \frac{\color{blue}{t \cdot z}}{16}\right) - \left(\frac{a \cdot b}{4} - c\right) \]

   3. associate-+l- 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{t \cdot z}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c} \]

   4. fma-define 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{t \cdot z}{16}\right)} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

   5. *-commutative 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot t}}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

   6. associate-/l* 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

   7. associate-/l* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \frac{t}{16}\right) - \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{b}{4}}\right) + c \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \frac{t}{16}\right) - a \cdot \frac{b}{4}\right) + c} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto c + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot \frac{t}{16}\right) - a \cdot \frac{b}{4}\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+69} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+58}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + t\_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c + t\_1\right) - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 0.0625 (* z t))))
   (if (or (<= (* x y) -6.5e+69) (not (<= (* x y) 5e+58)))
     (+ c (+ (* x y) t_1))
     (- (+ c t_1) (* (* a b) 0.25)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -6.5e+69) || !((x * y) <= 5e+58)) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 0.0625d0 * (z * t)
    if (((x * y) <= (-6.5d+69)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 5d+58))) then
        tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1)
    else
        tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -6.5e+69) || !((x * y) <= 5e+58)) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1);
	} else {
		tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -6.5e+69) or not ((x * y) <= 5e+58):
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1)
	else:
		tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = Float64(0.0625 * Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -6.5e+69) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 5e+58))
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(Float64(x * y) + t_1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c + t_1) - Float64(Float64(a * b) * 0.25));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -6.5e+69) || ~(((x * y) <= 5e+58)))
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = (c + t_1) - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(0.0625 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -6.5e+69], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+58]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -6.5000000000000001e69 or 4.99999999999999986e58 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -6.5000000000000001e69 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.99999999999999986e58

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + 0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+69} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+58}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+53} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+170}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + t\_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 0.0625 (* z t))))
   (if (or (<= (* a b) -1e+53) (not (<= (* a b) 5e+170)))
     (- t_1 (* (* a b) 0.25))
     (+ c (+ (* x y) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -1e+53) || !((a * b) <= 5e+170)) {
		tmp = t_1 - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 0.0625d0 * (z * t)
    if (((a * b) <= (-1d+53)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 5d+170))) then
        tmp = t_1 - ((a * b) * 0.25d0)
    else
        tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -1e+53) || !((a * b) <= 5e+170)) {
		tmp = t_1 - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -1e+53) or not ((a * b) <= 5e+170):
		tmp = t_1 - ((a * b) * 0.25)
	else:
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = Float64(0.0625 * Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -1e+53) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 5e+170))
		tmp = Float64(t_1 - Float64(Float64(a * b) * 0.25));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(Float64(x * y) + t_1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -1e+53) || ~(((a * b) <= 5e+170)))
		tmp = t_1 - ((a * b) * 0.25);
	else
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(0.0625 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -1e+53], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e+170]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t$95$1 - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -9.9999999999999999e52 or 4.99999999999999977e170 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + 0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in c around 0 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -9.9999999999999999e52 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.99999999999999977e170

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+53} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+170}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 87.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ t_2 := 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + t\_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2 - t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* a b) 0.25)) (t_2 (* 0.0625 (* z t))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -5e-12)
     (- (+ c (* x y)) t_1)
     (if (<= (* a b) 5e+170) (+ c (+ (* x y) t_2)) (- t_2 t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) * 0.25;
	double t_2 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e-12) {
		tmp = (c + (x * y)) - t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e+170) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_2);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2 - t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (a * b) * 0.25d0
    t_2 = 0.0625d0 * (z * t)
    if ((a * b) <= (-5d-12)) then
        tmp = (c + (x * y)) - t_1
    else if ((a * b) <= 5d+170) then
        tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_2)
    else
        tmp = t_2 - t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = (a * b) * 0.25;
	double t_2 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e-12) {
		tmp = (c + (x * y)) - t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5e+170) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_2);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2 - t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	t_1 = (a * b) * 0.25
	t_2 = 0.0625 * (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -5e-12:
		tmp = (c + (x * y)) - t_1
	elif (a * b) <= 5e+170:
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_2)
	else:
		tmp = t_2 - t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(a * b) * 0.25)
	t_2 = Float64(0.0625 * Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -5e-12)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c + Float64(x * y)) - t_1);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 5e+170)
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(Float64(x * y) + t_2));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_2 - t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = (a * b) * 0.25;
	t_2 = 0.0625 * (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -5e-12)
		tmp = (c + (x * y)) - t_1;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 5e+170)
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + t_2);
	else
		tmp = t_2 - t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(0.0625 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e-12], N[(N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5e+170], N[(c + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$2 - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -4.9999999999999997e-12

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -4.9999999999999997e-12 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.99999999999999977e170

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 4.99999999999999977e170 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 92.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + 0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in c around 0 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) - \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot 0.25\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 64.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{+68} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -1.02e+68) (not (<= (* x y) 2.2e+59)))
   (+ c (* x y))
   (+ c (* a (* b -0.25)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.02e+68) || !((x * y) <= 2.2e+59)) {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-1.02d+68)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 2.2d+59))) then
        tmp = c + (x * y)
    else
        tmp = c + (a * (b * (-0.25d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.02e+68) || !((x * y) <= 2.2e+59)) {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -1.02e+68) or not ((x * y) <= 2.2e+59):
		tmp = c + (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -1.02e+68) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 2.2e+59))
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(a * Float64(b * -0.25)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -1.02e+68) || ~(((x * y) <= 2.2e+59)))
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	else
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1.02e+68], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2.2e+59]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(a * N[(b * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.02e68 or 2.2e59 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 69.4%

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.02e68 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.2e59

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(\frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\right)} + c \]

      2. fma-define 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)} + c \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

      4. fma-neg 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, -\frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)}\right) + c \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot b}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

      6. metadata-eval 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{\color{blue}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 70.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   7. Simplified 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{+68} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 74.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+165}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -1.9e+165)
   (+ c (* a (* b -0.25)))
   (if (<= a 4.5e+31) (+ c (+ (* x y) (* 0.0625 (* z t)))) (* b (* a -0.25)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.9e+165) {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	} else if (a <= 4.5e+31) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-1.9d+165)) then
        tmp = c + (a * (b * (-0.25d0)))
    else if (a <= 4.5d+31) then
        tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625d0 * (z * t)))
    else
        tmp = b * (a * (-0.25d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.9e+165) {
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	} else if (a <= 4.5e+31) {
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -1.9e+165:
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25))
	elif a <= 4.5e+31:
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)))
	else:
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.9e+165)
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(a * Float64(b * -0.25)));
	elseif (a <= 4.5e+31)
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(0.0625 * Float64(z * t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * -0.25));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -1.9e+165)
		tmp = c + (a * (b * -0.25));
	elseif (a <= 4.5e+31)
		tmp = c + ((x * y) + (0.0625 * (z * t)));
	else
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1.9e+165], N[(c + N[(a * N[(b * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 4.5e+31], N[(c + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.0625 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * N[(a * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -1.89999999999999995e165

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(\frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)\right)} + c \]

      2. fma-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \frac{z \cdot t}{16} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)} + c \]

      3. associate-/l* 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{t}{16}} - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]

      4. fma-neg 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, -\frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right)}\right) + c \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac2 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot b}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

      6. metadata-eval 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{\color{blue}{-4}}\right)\right) + c \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{t}{16}, \frac{a \cdot b}{-4}\right)\right) + c} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + c \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 71.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot -0.25} + c \]

      2. associate-*r* 71.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   7. Simplified 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)} + c \]

   if -1.89999999999999995e165 < a < 4.4999999999999996e31

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 4.4999999999999996e31 < a

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + 0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around inf 49.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 50.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 50.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot -0.25\right)} \cdot b \]

   6. Simplified 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+165}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + a \cdot \left(b \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + \left(x \cdot y + 0.0625 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 97.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ c + \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ c (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c + (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = c + (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0d0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c + (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return c + (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(c + Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = c + (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(c + N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto c + \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 53.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+167} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -6.5e+167) (not (<= a 4.3e+25)))
   (* b (* a -0.25))
   (+ c (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -6.5e+167) || !(a <= 4.3e+25)) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-6.5d+167)) .or. (.not. (a <= 4.3d+25))) then
        tmp = b * (a * (-0.25d0))
    else
        tmp = c + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -6.5e+167) || !(a <= 4.3e+25)) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -6.5e+167) or not (a <= 4.3e+25):
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25)
	else:
		tmp = c + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -6.5e+167) || !(a <= 4.3e+25))
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = Float64(c + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -6.5e+167) || ~((a <= 4.3e+25)))
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	else
		tmp = c + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -6.5e+167], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 4.3e+25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * N[(a * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(c + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -6.5e167 or 4.29999999999999998e25 < a

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 81.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + 0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around inf 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 50.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 50.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot -0.25\right)} \cdot b \]

   6. Simplified 50.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -6.5e167 < a < 4.29999999999999998e25

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 81.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 53.5%

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+167} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 36.6% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-16} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-49}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -4.2e-16) (not (<= a 2.2e-49))) (* b (* a -0.25)) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -4.2e-16) || !(a <= 2.2e-49)) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-4.2d-16)) .or. (.not. (a <= 2.2d-49))) then
        tmp = b * (a * (-0.25d0))
    else
        tmp = c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -4.2e-16) || !(a <= 2.2e-49)) {
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	} else {
		tmp = c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -4.2e-16) or not (a <= 2.2e-49):
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25)
	else:
		tmp = c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -4.2e-16) || !(a <= 2.2e-49))
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * -0.25));
	else
		tmp = c;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -4.2e-16) || ~((a <= 2.2e-49)))
		tmp = b * (a * -0.25);
	else
		tmp = c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -4.2e-16], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 2.2e-49]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * N[(a * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], c]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -4.2000000000000002e-16 or 2.1999999999999999e-49 < a

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + 0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around inf 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 45.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 45.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot -0.25\right)} \cdot b \]

   6. Simplified 45.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot b} \]

   if -4.2000000000000002e-16 < a < 2.1999999999999999e-49

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 34.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{-16} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-49}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot -0.25\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 22.0% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c) :precision binary64 c)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return c
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := c

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 24.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024143 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))