Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 81.8% → 94.8%

Time: 11.1s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 81.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 94.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot -2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* z (* 2.0 z)) (* y t))) INFINITY)
   (+ x (* (* y -2.0) (/ z (- (* 2.0 (* z z)) (* y t)))))
   (- x (/ y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / ((z * (2.0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = x + ((y * -2.0) * (z / ((2.0 * (z * z)) - (y * t))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / ((z * (2.0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = x + ((y * -2.0) * (z / ((2.0 * (z * z)) - (y * t))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (((y * 2.0) * z) / ((z * (2.0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= math.inf:
		tmp = x + ((y * -2.0) * (z / ((2.0 * (z * z)) - (y * t))))
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(2.0 * z)) - Float64(y * t))) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * -2.0) * Float64(z / Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * z)) - Float64(y * t)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / ((z * (2.0 * z)) - (y * t))) <= Inf)
		tmp = x + ((y * -2.0) * (z / ((2.0 * (z * z)) - (y * t))));
	else
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(x + N[(N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / N[(N[(2.0 * N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 93.6%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y \cdot -2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) + x} \]

      3. associate-/l* 36.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 36.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} + x \]

      5. fma-define 36.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, -\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 77.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   7. Simplified 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot -2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 88.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.15e+42) (not (<= z 2.6e-16)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (* -2.0 (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.15e+42) || !(z <= 2.6e-16)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.15d+42)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.6d-16))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - ((-2.0d0) * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.15e+42) || !(z <= 2.6e-16)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.15e+42) or not (z <= 2.6e-16):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.15e+42) || !(z <= 2.6e-16))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(-2.0 * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.15e+42) || ~((z <= 2.6e-16)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.15e+42], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.6e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(-2.0 * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.1499999999999999e42 or 2.5999999999999998e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) + x} \]

      3. associate-/l* 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} + x \]

      5. fma-define 82.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, -\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   7. Simplified 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -2.1499999999999999e42 < z < 2.5999999999999998e-16

   1. Initial program 87.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 90.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.15 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 81.6% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -8e+17) (not (<= z 1.8e-20))) (- x (/ y z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8e+17) || !(z <= 1.8e-20)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-8d+17)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.8d-20))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -8e+17) || !(z <= 1.8e-20)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -8e+17) or not (z <= 1.8e-20):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -8e+17) || !(z <= 1.8e-20))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -8e+17) || ~((z <= 1.8e-20)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -8e+17], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.8e-20]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8e17 or 1.79999999999999987e-20 < z

   1. Initial program 68.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 68.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 68.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) + x} \]

      3. associate-/l* 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} + x \]

      5. fma-define 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, -\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 88.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   7. Simplified 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -8e17 < z < 1.79999999999999987e-20

   1. Initial program 87.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) + x} \]

      3. associate-/l* 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} + x \]

      5. fma-define 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, -\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+17} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-20}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.7% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 76.8%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 76.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 76.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) + x} \]

   3. associate-/l* 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}}\right) + x \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} + x \]

   5. fma-define 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, -\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 87.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot 2, \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024139 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- x (/ 1 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2) z)))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))