Numeric.Log:$cexpm1 from log-domain-0.10.2.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.1s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 0.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) x) y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * y) + x) + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * y) + x) + y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + x) + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * y) + x) + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) x) y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * y) + x) + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * y) + x) + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * y) + x) + y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + x) + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * y) + x) + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ y (fma x y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return y + fma(x, y, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(y + fma(x, y, x))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(y + N[(x * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.08 \cdot 10^{-89} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.42 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.08e-89) (not (<= x 1.42e-11))) (* x (+ y 1.0)) y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.08e-89) || !(x <= 1.42e-11)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.08d-89)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.42d-11))) then
        tmp = x * (y + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.08e-89) || !(x <= 1.42e-11)) {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.08e-89) or not (x <= 1.42e-11):
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.08e-89) || !(x <= 1.42e-11))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.08e-89) || ~((x <= 1.42e-11)))
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.08e-89], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.42e-11]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.07999999999999999e-89 or 1.42e-11 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]

   if -1.07999999999999999e-89 < x < 1.42e-11

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.08 \cdot 10^{-89} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.42 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 61.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.0) (* y x) (if (<= y 2.2e-90) x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if (y <= 2.2e-90) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = y * x
    else if (y <= 2.2d-90) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if (y <= 2.2e-90) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.0:
		tmp = y * x
	elif y <= 2.2e-90:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	elseif (y <= 2.2e-90)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = y * x;
	elseif (y <= 2.2e-90)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.2e-90], x, y]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + 1\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + y \cdot 1} \]

      2. *-rgt-identity 98.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot x + \color{blue}{y} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + y} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around inf 41.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 41.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   12. Simplified 41.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < y < 2.19999999999999986e-90

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.19999999999999986e-90 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.2e-90) (* x (+ y 1.0)) (* y (+ x 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.2e-90) {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (x + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.2d-90) then
        tmp = x * (y + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = y * (x + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.2e-90) {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (x + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.2e-90:
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = y * (x + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.2e-90)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.2e-90)
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = y * (x + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.2e-90], N[(x * N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.19999999999999986e-90

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]

   if 2.19999999999999986e-90 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + x\right) + y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ y x) (* y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (y + x) + (y * x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (y + x) + (y * x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (y + x) + (y * x);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (y + x) + (y * x)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(y + x) + Float64(y * x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (y + x) + (y * x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + x\right) + y \]

   2. distribute-lft1-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x} + y \]

   3. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + 1, x, y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + 1, x, y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-undefine 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right) \cdot x + y} \]

   2. distribute-lft1-in 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + x\right)} + y \]

   3. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + x\right) + y \]

   4. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x + y\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   6. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   7. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(y + x\right) + \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) + y \cdot x} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 49.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 2.2e-90) x y))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.2e-90) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.2d-90) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.2e-90) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.2e-90:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.2e-90)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.2e-90)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.2e-90], x, y]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.19999999999999986e-90

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 48.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.19999999999999986e-90 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 39.0% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + x\right) + y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 37.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024139 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Numeric.Log:$cexpm1 from log-domain-0.10.2.1, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) x) y))