Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 89.6% → 99.8%

Time: 15.4s

Alternatives: 16

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 89.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(-1 + x, \log y, -t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma (+ z -1.0) (log1p (- y)) (fma (+ -1.0 x) (log y) (- t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((z + -1.0), log1p(-y), fma((-1.0 + x), log(y), -t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(Float64(z + -1.0), log1p(Float64(-y)), fma(Float64(-1.0 + x), log(y), Float64(-t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + (-t)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) + \left(-t\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(-t\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right)} \]

   4. fma-define 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right)} \]

   5. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   8. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   9. fma-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, -t\right)}\right) \]

   10. sub-neg 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, -t\right)\right) \]

   11. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, -t\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, -t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(-1 + x, \log y, -t\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (fma (+ z -1.0) (log1p (- y)) (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((z + -1.0), log1p(-y), ((-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(fma(Float64(z + -1.0), log1p(Float64(-y)), Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-define 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot -0.5 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z + -1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))
   (*
    y
    (+
     (- 1.0 z)
     (* y (+ (* (+ z -1.0) -0.5) (* -0.3333333333333333 (* y (+ z -1.0))))))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.5) + (-0.3333333333333333 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + (y * (((z + (-1.0d0)) * (-0.5d0)) + ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (y * (z + (-1.0d0))))))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.5) + (-0.3333333333333333 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.5) + (-0.3333333333333333 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * -0.5) + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * Float64(y * Float64(z + -1.0)))))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.5) + (-0.3333333333333333 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[(y * N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot -0.5 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z + -1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))
   (*
    (+ z -1.0)
    (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5))))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + ((z + (-1.0d0)) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))
   (* (+ z -1.0) (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5))))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + ((z + (-1.0d0)) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 96.0% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{-14} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.65e-14) (not (<= x 1.05e-18)))
   (- (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) t)
   (- (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) (log y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.65e-14) || !(x <= 1.05e-18)) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.65d-14)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.05d-18))) then
        tmp = (((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = ((y * (1.0d0 - z)) - log(y)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.65e-14) || !(x <= 1.05e-18)) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - Math.log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.65e-14) or not (x <= 1.05e-18):
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - math.log(y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.65e-14) || !(x <= 1.05e-18))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.65e-14) || ~((x <= 1.05e-18)))
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.65e-14], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.05e-18]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.6499999999999999e-14 or 1.05e-18 < x

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   if -1.6499999999999999e-14 < x < 1.05e-18

   1. Initial program 79.2%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right) - t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      4. *-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. unsub-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. *-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      8. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      9. sub-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      10. metadata-eval 98.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      11. +-commutative 98.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t \]

   10. Simplified 98.7%

       \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{-14} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 73.9% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+184}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -19500000:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\left(\log y + t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (log y))))
   (if (<= x -1.55e+184)
     t_1
     (if (<= x -19500000.0)
       (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5)))) t)
       (if (<= x 1e+37) (- (+ (log y) t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.55e+184) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= -19500000.0) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
	} else if (x <= 1e+37) {
		tmp = -(log(y) + t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * log(y)
    if (x <= (-1.55d+184)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (x <= (-19500000.0d0)) then
        tmp = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0))))) - t
    else if (x <= 1d+37) then
        tmp = -(log(y) + t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * Math.log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.55e+184) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= -19500000.0) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
	} else if (x <= 1e+37) {
		tmp = -(Math.log(y) + t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x * math.log(y)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.55e+184:
		tmp = t_1
	elif x <= -19500000.0:
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t
	elif x <= 1e+37:
		tmp = -(math.log(y) + t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x * log(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.55e+184)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= -19500000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5)))) - t);
	elseif (x <= 1e+37)
		tmp = Float64(-Float64(log(y) + t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x * log(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.55e+184)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= -19500000.0)
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
	elseif (x <= 1e+37)
		tmp = -(log(y) + t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -1.55e+184], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, -19500000.0], N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1e+37], (-N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.5499999999999999e184 or 9.99999999999999954e36 < x

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z} + \frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z}\right)\right)} - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 68.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z} + \frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      2. log1p-define 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z} + \frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      3. +-commutative 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z} + -1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)}\right) - t \]

      4. mul-1-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)}\right)\right) - t \]

      5. unsub-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)}}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      7. metadata-eval 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right)}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      8. associate-/l* 69.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \frac{x + -1}{z}} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      9. +-commutative 69.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 + x}}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. sub-neg 69.4%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{-1 + x}{z} - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      11. log1p-define 69.4%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{-1 + x}{z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{-1 + x}{z} - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}{z}\right)\right)} - t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]

   if -1.5499999999999999e184 < x < -1.95e7

   1. Initial program 83.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot y} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 65.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   9. Simplified 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around inf 64.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   if -1.95e7 < x < 9.99999999999999954e36

   1. Initial program 81.6%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot y} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   9. Simplified 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(t + \log y\right)} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 75.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(t + \log y\right)} \]

       2. distribute-neg-in 75.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) + \left(-\log y\right)} \]

       3. unsub-neg 75.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) - \log y} \]

   12. Simplified 75.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) - \log y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+184}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -19500000:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\left(\log y + t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) (* (+ z -1.0) (* y (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5))))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + ((z + (-1.0d0)) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 87.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.95\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\left(\log y + t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 0.95))) (- (* x (log y)) t) (- (+ (log y) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.95)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = -(log(y) + t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 0.95d0))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = -(log(y) + t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.95)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = -(Math.log(y) + t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 0.95):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = -(math.log(y) + t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.95))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-Float64(log(y) + t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 0.95)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = -(log(y) + t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 0.95]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], (-N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision])]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 0.94999999999999996 < x

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z} + \frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z}\right)\right)} - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 69.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z} + \frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      2. log1p-define 74.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z} + \frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      3. +-commutative 74.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z} + -1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)}\right) - t \]

      4. mul-1-neg 74.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)}\right)\right) - t \]

      5. unsub-neg 74.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 74.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)}}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      7. metadata-eval 74.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right)}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      8. associate-/l* 74.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \frac{x + -1}{z}} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      9. +-commutative 74.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 + x}}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. sub-neg 74.2%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{-1 + x}{z} - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      11. log1p-define 74.2%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{-1 + x}{z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{-1 + x}{z} - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}{z}\right)\right)} - t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.3%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \log y}{z}} - t \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 67.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{z}\right)} - t \]

   10. Simplified 67.2%

       \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{z}\right)} - t \]

   11. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - t} \]

   if -1 < x < 0.94999999999999996

   1. Initial program 80.6%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot y} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   9. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(t + \log y\right)} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 76.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(t + \log y\right)} \]

       2. distribute-neg-in 76.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) + \left(-\log y\right)} \]

       3. unsub-neg 76.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) - \log y} \]

   12. Simplified 76.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) - \log y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.95\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\left(\log y + t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 64.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+184} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.2e+184) (not (<= x 2.1e+37)))
   (* x (log y))
   (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.2e+184) || !(x <= 2.1e+37)) {
		tmp = x * log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.2d+184)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.1d+37))) then
        tmp = x * log(y)
    else
        tmp = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0))))) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.2e+184) || !(x <= 2.1e+37)) {
		tmp = x * Math.log(y);
	} else {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.2e+184) or not (x <= 2.1e+37):
		tmp = x * math.log(y)
	else:
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.2e+184) || !(x <= 2.1e+37))
		tmp = Float64(x * log(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5)))) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.2e+184) || ~((x <= 2.1e+37)))
		tmp = x * log(y);
	else
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.2e+184], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.1e+37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.19999999999999998e184 or 2.1000000000000001e37 < x

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z} + \frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z}\right)\right)} - t \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 68.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z} + \frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      2. log1p-define 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z} + \frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      3. +-commutative 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z} + -1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)}\right) - t \]

      4. mul-1-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)}\right)\right) - t \]

      5. unsub-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. sub-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)}}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      7. metadata-eval 69.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\frac{\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right)}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      8. associate-/l* 69.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \frac{x + -1}{z}} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      9. +-commutative 69.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 + x}}{z} - \frac{\log \left(1 - y\right)}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. sub-neg 69.4%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{-1 + x}{z} - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

      11. log1p-define 69.4%

          \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{-1 + x}{z} - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}}{z}\right)\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 69.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) + \left(\log y \cdot \frac{-1 + x}{z} - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}{z}\right)\right)} - t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]

   if -1.19999999999999998e184 < x < 2.1000000000000001e37

   1. Initial program 81.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot y} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   9. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around inf 62.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+184} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 99.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) (* y (- 1.0 z))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + (y * (1.0d0 - z))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-define 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right) - t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. *-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. unsub-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. *-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. +-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   9. sub-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   10. metadata-eval 98.9%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   11. +-commutative 98.9%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

7. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t} \]

8. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\right) - t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 89.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+240}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\left(t + z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 1.5e+240) (- (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) t) (- (+ t (* z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.5e+240) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = -(t + (z * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 1.5d+240) then
        tmp = (((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = -(t + (z * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.5e+240) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = -(t + (z * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 1.5e+240:
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = -(t + (z * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.5e+240)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-Float64(t + Float64(z * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 1.5e+240)
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = -(t + (z * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.5e+240], N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], (-N[(t + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.4999999999999999e240

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   if 1.4999999999999999e240 < z

   1. Initial program 27.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 27.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 27.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 27.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 27.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 27.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right) - t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      4. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      8. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      9. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 87.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

      2. neg-mul-1 87.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z - t \]

   10. Simplified 87.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{+240}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-\left(t + z \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 46.7% accurate, 19.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot y} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

6. Simplified 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 68.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

9. Simplified 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5 - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

10. Taylor expanded in z around inf 49.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

11. Final simplification 49.5%

    \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 46.4% accurate, 35.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\left(t + z \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (+ t (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -(t + (z * y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -(t + (z * y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -(t + (z * y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -(t + (z * y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-Float64(t + Float64(z * y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -(t + (z * y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-N[(t + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-define 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right) - t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. *-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. unsub-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. *-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. +-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   9. sub-neg 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   10. metadata-eval 98.9%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   11. +-commutative 98.9%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

7. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right) - t} \]

8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 49.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 49.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

   2. neg-mul-1 49.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z - t \]

10. Simplified 49.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

11. Final simplification 49.2%

    \[\leadsto -\left(t + z \cdot y\right) \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 36.4% accurate, 107.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-t)

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-define 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 36.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 36.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

7. Simplified 36.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 2.3% accurate, 215.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 0.0)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 0.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 0.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 0.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return 0.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return 0.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := 0.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.1%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-define 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 36.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 36.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

7. Simplified 36.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 17.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-t\right)\right)} \]

   2. expm1-undefine 17.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-t\right)} - 1} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 17.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-t\right)} - 1} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. sub-neg 17.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-t\right)} + \left(-1\right)} \]

    2. log1p-undefine 17.3%

       \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)}} + \left(-1\right) \]

    3. rem-exp-log 36.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-t\right)\right)} + \left(-1\right) \]

    4. unsub-neg 36.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - t\right)} + \left(-1\right) \]

    5. metadata-eval 36.0%

       \[\leadsto \left(1 - t\right) + \color{blue}{-1} \]

11. Simplified 36.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - t\right) + -1} \]

12. Taylor expanded in t around 0 2.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} + -1 \]
13. Step-by-step derivation

    1. metadata-eval 2.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]

14. Applied egg-rr 2.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]
15. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024139 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))