b parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.5s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.0×

• 42.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (* (- 1.0 m) (/ m v)) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * (((1.0d0 - m) * (m / v)) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(m / v)) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. associate-*r/ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (+ -1.0 (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v)) (* m (* (/ m v) (+ m -1.0)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0 + ((m * (1.0 - m)) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + ((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v)
    else
        tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + (-1.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0 + ((m * (1.0 - m)) / v);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = -1.0 + ((m * (1.0 - m)) / v)
	else:
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -1.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(m + -1.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = -1.0 + ((m * (1.0 - m)) / v);
	else
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -1.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(-1.0 + N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot m\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

      2. associate-*r/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (* m (* (/ m v) (+ m -1.0)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + (-1.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -1.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(m + -1.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = m * ((m / v) * (m + -1.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot m\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

      2. associate-*r/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m + -1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.44:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m \cdot m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 0.44) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (* m (/ (* m m) v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.44) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m * m) / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 0.44d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = m * ((m * m) / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.44) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((m * m) / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 0.44:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = m * ((m * m) / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 0.44)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m * m) / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 0.44)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = m * ((m * m) / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 0.44], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 0.440000000000000002

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 0.440000000000000002 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot m\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot m\right)}}{v} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)}}{v} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.44:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m \cdot m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 87.1% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + m\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.3) (+ (/ m v) -1.0) (/ (* m (+ 1.0 m)) v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.3) {
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (1.0 + m)) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.3d0) then
        tmp = (m / v) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (m * (1.0d0 + m)) / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.3) {
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (1.0 + m)) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.3:
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (m * (1.0 + m)) / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.3)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 + m)) / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.3)
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (m * (1.0 + m)) / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.3], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 + m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.2999999999999998

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} - 1} \]

   if 2.2999999999999998 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 0.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot 1 + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-m} \cdot \sqrt{-m}\right)} \]

      10. sqrt-unprod 80.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)}} \]

      11. sqr-neg 80.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}} \]

      12. sqrt-unprod 80.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{m} \cdot \sqrt{m}\right)} \]

      13. add-sqr-sqrt 80.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{m} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 80.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 80.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in v around 0 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + m\right)}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + m\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 87.1% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{1 + m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.3) (+ (/ m v) -1.0) (* m (/ (+ 1.0 m) v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.3) {
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((1.0 + m) / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.3d0) then
        tmp = (m / v) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = m * ((1.0d0 + m) / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.3) {
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((1.0 + m) / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.3:
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m * ((1.0 + m) / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.3)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 + m) / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.3)
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m * ((1.0 + m) / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.3], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 + m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.2999999999999998

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} - 1} \]

   if 2.2999999999999998 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 0.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot 1 + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      9. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-m} \cdot \sqrt{-m}\right)} \]

      10. sqrt-unprod 80.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)}} \]

      11. sqr-neg 80.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}} \]

      12. sqrt-unprod 80.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{m} \cdot \sqrt{m}\right)} \]

      13. add-sqr-sqrt 80.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{m} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot m} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 80.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 80.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in v around 0 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + m\right)}{v}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 80.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 + m}{v}} \]

      2. +-commutative 80.8%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m + 1}}{v} \]

   10. Simplified 80.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{m + 1}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{1 + m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 87.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \left(1 + m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (+ (/ m v) -1.0) (+ 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return ((m / v) + -1.0) * (1.0 + m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = ((m / v) + (-1.0d0)) * (1.0d0 + m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return ((m / v) + -1.0) * (1.0 + m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return ((m / v) + -1.0) * (1.0 + m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0) * Float64(1.0 + m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = ((m / v) + -1.0) * (1.0 + m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 53.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot 1 + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   4. *-un-lft-identity 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   5. sub-neg 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   8. metadata-eval 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   9. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-m} \cdot \sqrt{-m}\right)} \]

   10. sqrt-unprod 90.1%

       \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)}} \]

   11. sqr-neg 90.1%

       \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}} \]

   12. sqrt-unprod 90.1%

       \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{m} \cdot \sqrt{m}\right)} \]

   13. add-sqr-sqrt 90.1%

       \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{m} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot m} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt1-in 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

7. Simplified 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

8. Final simplification 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \cdot \left(1 + m\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 62.2% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{-132}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.35e-132) -1.0 (/ m v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.35e-132) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.35d-132) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.35e-132) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.35e-132:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.35e-132)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.35e-132)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.35e-132], -1.0, N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.34999999999999995e-132

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 1.34999999999999995e-132 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 29.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 65.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 57.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 26.3% accurate, 2.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1e-24) -1.0 m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1e-24) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1d-24) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1e-24) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1e-24:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1e-24)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1e-24)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1e-24], -1.0, m]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 9.99999999999999924e-25

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 54.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 9.99999999999999924e-25 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot m}}{v} + -1\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 92.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{v} + -1\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 5.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m - 1} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf 5.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 75.7% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{m}{v} + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ (/ m v) -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (m / v) + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (m / v) + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (m / v) + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (m / v) + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in m around 0 53.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 76.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{1} \]

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 76.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} - 1} \]

6. Final simplification 76.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} + -1 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 26.2% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ m -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in v around inf 30.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 30.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 - m\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 30.3%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 30.3%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-m\right) + 1\right)} \]

   4. distribute-neg-in 30.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-m\right)\right) + \left(-1\right)} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 30.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} + \left(-1\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 30.3%

      \[\leadsto m + \color{blue}{-1} \]

7. Simplified 30.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m + -1} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 23.7% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 28.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024137 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "b parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))